• Review - Institute of Public Affairs

Publisher:
Institute of Public Affairs
Publication date:
2009-06-04
ISBN:
1030-4177
First document:
Vol. 56 Nbr. 2, June 2004
Last document:
Vol. 63 Nbr. 2, June 2011
Copyright:
COPYRIGHT TV Trade Media, Inc.<br/>COPYRIGHT GALE, Cengage Learning. All rights reserved.

Latest documents

  • Taxi Mess an Old, Stubborn Failure of Government

    In Melbourne, train performance was seen as a key factor in the defeat of the Labor Government in last November's Victorian Election, yet surveys conducted by Victoria's Department of Transport have consistently shown a greater degree of customer dissatisfaction with taxis than with the much maligned trains. So, given that improving the trains was seen as a key performance indicator for the new Victorian government, it was perhaps surprising that, when it came to taxis, nobody seemed to be applying much pressure to governments to fix the problems. Combined with regulations around industry structure, the types of services taxis can provide and the price they can charge, the licensing system has created a deadly policy cocktail. A deregulated taxi industry will not mean that taxis are alw...

  • Bourgeois Dignity

    : Why Economics Can't Explain the Modern World, by Deirdre McCloskey, is reviewed.

  • The Biggest Loser Is the Nanny-State

    The recently concluded reality television show, The Biggest Loser, contains some surprising lessons for public policy. Of all the reality television shows bombarding people, The Biggest Loser best combines entertainment with the spectacle of social stratification. And The Biggest Loser contestants fulfil their expectations. The Biggest Loser approach is to offer a massive financial incentive in the form of $100,000 of prize money to lose weight, plus substantial amounts of personal training and a fair dose of new-age group therapy support. Locking every obese person up in a reality television show for months on end is not a public policy option, even if it is one of the very few approaches that clearly works. As the contestants in The Biggest Loser show, and research supports, there is ...

  • Wikileaked

    Inside Wikileaks: My Time with Julian Assange at the World's Most Dangerous Website, by Daniel Domscheit-Berg, is reviewed.

  • Bad History Now a National Problem

    Australia's unique cultural heritage risks being lost if the next generation is not taught about its classical liberal origins. Australia's education ministers have decided there will be a single National Curriculum for the country. The National Curriculum dictates what every student is taught up to Year 10. The plan of the ministers is that by the end of 2013 the National Curriculum for English, Mathematics, Science and History will have been substantially implemented. It's no exaggeration to say the National Curriculum is a document giving politicians enormous power over the lives of the country's citizens. The National Curriculum helps shape what people think. Eventually every single Australian will have been taught according to what's in the National Curriculum. For the National Cur...

  • Wild Colonial Boy

    Colony: Strange Origins of One of the Earliest Modern Democracies, by Reg Hamilton, is reviewed.

  • Should Parallel Import Restrictions Be Removed?

    For Tim Wilson, director of the IP and Free Trade Unit and Sinclair Davidson, senior fellow at the Institute of Public Affairs, Parallel Import Restrictions are an unjustified government intervention into the market for books. In a highly competitive market publishers can only sell high by offering a quality product, or by monopolizing the market by restricting supply to raise prices. But government action to remove parallel import restrictions would undermine private property rights, argues Alan Moran, director of the Deregulation Unit at the Institute of Public Affairs. For practical purposes, normally a product is sold to everyone at the same price despite some people valuing it more than others. The owner, not the government, should decide when it is worth taking action to charge pe...

  • From the Editor

    Nearly a third of the savings identified in this year's federal budget is actually the government's temporary flood levy -- collecting one and a half billion dollars for the 2011-2012 financial year. This rhetorical trick -- that you can make savings by increasing revenue -- was duly and uncritically repeated in much of Australian media's budget coverage. It's an old trick. Last year's budget claimed that increasing the tobacco excise was a 'major saving'. Then there's the yearly predictable erosion of tax concessions on investments. Eliminating loopholes may be a worthy task in its own right, but they constitute, implicitly, an increase in the overall tax burden. The crowing of the government about its successful management of the global financial crisis is dangerously misplaced.

  • Champions of Rights?

    The proposed national curriculum, developed by the Australian Government, suggests that the ongoing struggle for human rights and freedoms in the world is fundamentally a result of the establishment in the last century of the UN and other international organizations. Indeed, the proposed curriculum asks students to consider the role of the UN in protecting human rights, when in actual fact this organization has a long tradition of shamefully declining to respond to gross human rights violations. The inclusion of the UN is all the more galling when you consider the glaring omissions from the history of the development of human rights. For nearly six decades the absolute failure of the UN to protect human rights was epitomized by its notorious Commission on Human Rights.

  • The Greens and Labor: It's Time for a Divorce

    When Prime Minister Julia Gillard announced her carbon tax plan at the end of February, Greens leader Bob Brown and his deputy Christine Mime not only got to join her at the press conference. They also had the pleasure of seeing the Prime Minister formally adopt a policy proposal that they had put forward 12 months before. The public response was swift and severe. Less than a fortnight after Gillard broke her election promise not to put a price on carbon, the first Newspoll for March found Labor's primary vote was at an all-time low. Labor figures were debating that very matter even before the damning Newspoll. The Prime Minister's adoption of the Greens' carbon tax proposal -- despite her election time denials -- has infuriated more.

Featured documents