Gall v Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date13 April 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 345
CourtFederal Court
Date13 April 2021


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Gall v Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Limited (No 2) [2021] FCA 345

File number:

VID 685 of 2019



Judgment of:

MURPHY J



Date of judgment:

13 April 2021



Catchwords:

PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – Representative Proceedings - application to strike out Further Amended Statement of Claim (FASOC)– approach to pleadings having regard to modern case management – whether parts of FASOC should be struck out as they do not disclose a reasonable cause of action – whether Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (Fair Work Act) constitutes a code in relation to claims concerning underpayment of award entitlements which precludes such claims under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL) in Sch. 2 of the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) – whether by necessary implication ss 52 and 82 of Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) impliedly limited or repealed to the extent of any inconsistency by later enactment ofFair Work Act –whether ss 18 and 236 of the ACL should be construed as limited in relation to claims concerning underpayment of award entitlements by the operation of ss 45, 539 and 545 of the Fair Work Act– whether the pleading is sufficient to show that the applicant and group members have suffered loss and damage when their rights to bring an action under the Fair Work Act are intact – whether the pleading of causation and reliance is sufficient – whether the applicant is required to plead a counterfactual – whether the applicant is required to plead whether “but for” or “a material cause” test for causation is relied upon – whether the applicant is required to plead that the reliance of third parties on the alleged representations was reasonable – whether the pleading of the representations is adequate – whether miscellaneous parts of FASOC should be struck out as conclusory, rolled up, embarrassing, confusing, vague or ambiguous – strikeout application dismissed



Legislation:

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth)

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)

Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth)

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth)

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)

Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Act 1986 (Cth)

Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth)

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth)

Civil Procedure Act 2005 (NSW)

Industrial Arbitration Act 1912 (NSW)

Supreme Court (General Civil Procedure) Rules 2015(Vic)

Explanatory Memorandum for the Fair Work Bill 2008



Cases cited:

Allstate Life Insurance Co v Australia & New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (unreported, Beaumont J, 13 September 1994)

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd[2013] HCA 54; 250 CLR 640

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 130

Banque Commerciale S.A., En Liquidation v Akhil Holdings Ltd[1990] HCA 11; (1990) 169 CLR 279

Barclay Mowlem Construction Ltd v Dampier Port Authority and Another [2006] WASC 281; (2006) 33 WAR 82

Berry v CCL Secure Pty Ltd [2020] HCA 27; (2020) 94 ALJR 715

Bond Corp Pty Ltd v Thiess(1987) 14 FCR 215; (1987) 71 ALR 615

Brosnan v Katke [2016] FCAFC 1

Builders Licensing Board v Inglis (1985) 1 NSWLR 592

Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Ltd[2004] HCA 60; 218 CLR 592

Butler v Attorney-General (Victoria)[1961] HCA 32; (1961) 106 CLR 268

Byrne v Australian Airlines Ltd[1995] HCA 24; (1995) 185 CLR 410

Campbell v BackOffice Investments Pty Ltd[2009] HCA 25; (2009) 238 CLR 304

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Gordonstone Coal Management Pty Ltd[1997] FCA 1014; (1997) 78 FCR 437

Dafallah v Fair Work Commission[2014] FCA 328; (2014) 225 FCR 559

Doe d Rochester (Bishop) v Bridges(1831) 1 B&Ad 847; 109 ER 1001

Downer Connect Pty Ltd v McConnell Dowell Construction (Aust) Pty Ltd [2008] VSC 77

Energex Limited v Alstom Australia Limited [2005] FCAFC 215; (2005) 225 ALR 504

Ethicon Sarl v Gill[2021] FCAFC 29

Ezekiel v Law Society of the Australian Capital Territory[2013] FCA 725

Forty Two International Pty Ltd v Barnes[2010] FCA 397

Goodwin v Phillips[1908] HCA 55; (1908) 7 CLR 1

Google Inc v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission[2013] HCA 1; 259 CLR 435

I & L Securities Pty Ltd v HTW Valuers (Brisbane) Pty Ltd[2002] HCA 41; (2002) 210 CLR 109

Janssen-Cilag Pty Ltd v Pfizer Pty Ltd [1992] FCA 649; (1992) 37 FCR 526

Johnson Tiles Pty Ltd v Esso Australia Pty Ltd[2000] FCA 1572; (2000) 104 FCR 564

Josephson v Walker[1914] HCA 68; (1914) 18 CLR 691

Kernel Holdings Pty Ltd v Rothmans of Pall Mall (Australia) Pty Ltd (3 September 1991, French J, unreported)

Mallinson v Scottish Australian Investment Co Ltd [1920] HCA 51; (1920) 28 CLR 66

March v E & MH Stramare Pty Ltd[1991] HCA 12; (1991) 171 CLR 506

Marks v GIO Australia Holdings[1998] HCA 69; (1998) 196 CLR 494

McGuirk v University of New South Wales[2009] NSWSC 1424

McKellar v Container Terminal Management Services Limited[1999] FCA 1101; (1999) 165 ALR 409

Mobil Oil Australia Pty Ltd v Victoria(2002) 211 CLR 1; [2002] HCA 27

Multigroup Distribution Services Pty Ltd v TNT Australian Pty Ltd [1996] FCA 781; (1996) ATPR 41-522

National Mutual Property Services (Australia) Pty Ltd v Citibank Savings Ltd (1995) 132 ALR 514

Oztech Pty Ltd v Public Trustee of Queensland[2019] FCAFC 102; (2019) 269 FCR 349

P Dawson Nominees Pty Ltd v Brookfield Multiplex Ltd (No 2) [2010] FCA 176

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture v Puxu Pty Ltd[1982] HCA 44; (1982) 149 CLR 191

Pasmore v Oswaldtwistle Urban District Council(1898) AC 387

Plaintiff S157/2002 v Commonwealth of Australia [2003] HCA 2; (2003) 211 CLR 476

Polar Aviation Pty Ltd v Civil Aviation Safety Authority (No 4) [2011] FCA 1126; (2011) 203 FCR 293

Pt Bayan Resources TBK v BCBC Singapore Pte Ltd [2015] HCA 36; (2015) 258 CLR 1

Qantas Airways Limited v Gama[2008] FCAFC 69; (2008) 167 FCR 537; 247 ALR 273

Re Punters Show Pty Ltd[2017] NSWSC 605

Sadie Ville Pty Ltd v Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu (A Firm) [2017] FCA 1202

Sarawati v The Queen[1991] HCA 21; (1991) 172 CLR 1

Sellars v Adelaide Petroleum[1994] HCA 4; (1994) 179 CLR 332; (1994) 120 ALR 16

Shergold v Tanner[2002] HCA 19; (2002) 209 CLR 126

SMEC Australia Pty Ltd v McConnell Dowell Constructions (Aust) Pty Ltd (No. 2) [2011] VSC 492

State of Queensland v Pioneer Concrete (Qld) Pty Ltd [1999] FCA 499; [1999] ATPR 41-691

Taco Co of Australia Inc v Taco Bell Pty Ltd [1982] FCA 170; (1982) 42 ALR 177

Taylor v Lederman [2013] VSC 99

Thomas v Powercor Australia Ltd (No 1) [2010] VSC 489

Thomson v STX Pan Ocean Co Ltd [2012] FCAFC 15

Truth About Motorways Pty Ltd v Macquarie Infrastructure Investments Management Ltd [1998] FCA 525; (1998) ATPR 41-633; (1998) 42 IPR 1

Uber Australia...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
7 cases
  • O'Donnell v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 8 October 2021
    ...v Carnie (1992) 29 NSWLR 382 Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Ltd [1972] HCA 61; 127 CLR 421 Gall v Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 345; 391 ALR 675 Jameson v Professional Investment Services [2009] NSWCA 28; 72 NSWLR 281 Kerrison v Melbourne City Council [2014] FCAFC 130; 2......
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v NQCranes Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 20 October 2021
    ...Commission [2012] HCA 39; (2012) 247 CLR 486 Fuller v Toms [2012] FCA 27; (2012) 247 FCR 440 Gall v Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 345; (2021) 304 IR 300 Imobilari Pty Ltd v Opes Prime Stockbroking Ltd [2008] FCA 1920; (2008) 252 ALR 41 Impiombato v BHP Group Ltd (No 2) [2......
  • Thomas v Romeo Lockleys Asset Partnership
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 19 September 2022
    ...FCA 70 Fair Work Ombudsman v Woolworths Group Limited (Case Management) [2022] FCA 376 Gall v Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 345; 391 ALR 675 Kelly v Willmott Forests Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2016] FCA 323; 335 ALR 439 Modtech Engineering Pty Limited v GPT Management Holdings ......
  • EIX20 v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 November 2022
    ...(No 3) [2020] FCA 1629 Fair Work Ombudsman v Eastern Colour Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 803 Gall v Domino's Pizza Enterprises Limited (No 2) [2021] FCA 345 Herridge Parties v Electricity Networks Corporation t/as Western Power [2021] WASCA 111 Howard v Jarvis (1958) 98 CLR 177 Jenkings v Northern Te......
  • Get Started for Free