ACCC v Leelee Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Date | 2000 |
| Year | 2000 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
50 cases
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v NSW Ports Operations Hold Co Pty Ltd
...Pty Limited v Rieson [2006] HCA 31; (2006) 225 CLR 516 Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority [2000] FCA 1381; (2000) ATPR 41-783 Stirling Harbour Services Pty Ltd v Bunbury Port Authority [2000] FCA 38; (2000) ATPR 41-752 Stokely-Van Camp Inc v New Generation Beverages ......
-
Hoy Mobile Pty Ltd v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2)
...Co (1877) 2 App Cas 439 cited Hunter BNZ Finance v GC Maloney Pty Ltd (1988) 18 NSWLR 420 cited Hurley v McDonald’s Australia Ltd (2000) ATPR 41-741 referred to Immer (No 145) Pty Ltd v Uniting Church in Australia Property Trust (NSW) (1993) 182 CLR 26 followed International Air Transport A......
-
Tuggeranong Town Centre Pty Ltd(Plaintiff and Cross Defendant) v Brenda Hungerford Pty Ltd (Defendant and Counter Claimant)
...discussion: 184 The ordinary or dictionary meaning of the word ‘unconscionable’ was explained in Hurley v McDonald's Australia Ltd (2000) ATPR 41–741 at [22]: For conduct to be regarded as unconscionable, serious misconduct or something clearly unfair or unreasonable, must be demonstrated —......
Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
-
Australia
...THE AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION 4 (2014) [hereinafter S ECTION 87B G UIDELINES ]. 122. (1996)71 F.C.R. 285. 123. [2000] A.T.P.R. 41-758. 124. SECTION 87B GUIDELINES , supra note 121, at 3. 125. CCA §§ 7, 10. Australia-27 c. NCC Upon its establishment in 1995, the NCC 126 ......