Ackers (as joint foreign representative) v Saad Investments Company Ltd; Saad Investments Company Ltd (in official liquidation) includes Addendum

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date2013
Neutral Citation2013-0730 FCA A
Year2013
Date2013
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Manharlal Trikamdas Mody v Sumikin Bussan International (HK) Ltd
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 June 2014
    ...Akers (as joint foreign representative) v Saad Investments Company Limited; Re Saad Investments Company Limited (in official liquidation) [2013] FCA 738, Rares J was confronted with a similar issue of whether the Commissioner of Taxation had submitted to the jurisdiction of the Grand Court ......
  • Manharlal Trikamdas Mody and another v Sumikin Bussan International (HK) Limited
    • Singapore
    • High Court (Singapore)
    • 30 June 2014
    ...Akers (as joint foreign representative) v Saad Investments Company Limited; Re Saad Investments Company Limited (in official liquidation) [2013] FCA 738, Rares J was confronted with a similar issue of whether the Commissioner of Taxation had submitted to the jurisdiction of the Grand Court ......
1 firm's commentaries
2 books & journal articles
  • CROSS-BORDER INSOLVENCY AND ITS IMPACT ON ARBITRATION
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2014, December 2014
    • 1 December 2014
    ...39 [2013] 1 AC 236. 40 Rubin v Eurofinance SA [2013] 1 AC 236 at [158]. 41 Ackers v Saad Investments Co Ltd; Re Saad Investments Co Ltd [2013] FCA 738; Isis Investments Ltd v Oscatello Investments Ltd[2013] EWHC 75 (Ch). See also Adrian Briggs, “Rubin and New Cap: Foreign Judgments and Inso......
  • Recognition and enforcement in cross-border insolvency law: a proposal for judicial gap-filling.
    • United States
    • Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law Vol. 48 No. 5, November - November 2015
    • 1 November 2015
    ...Even Australia, which adopted the Model Law in its entirety, has excluded banks and the insurance industry from its operation. (49.) [2013] FCA 738 (30 July 2013) (Austl.). This decision was subject to an unsuccessful appeal by Akers to the Full Federal Court and an application for special ......