Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[2012] FCAFC 16
Date2012
Year2012
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
11 cases
  • Realestate.com.au Pty Ltd v Hardingham; RP Data Pty Ltd v Hardingham
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 December 2022
    ...CLR 88 at 94-95, 119-120; Acohs Pty Ltd v RA Bashford Consulting Pty Ltd (1997) 144 ALR 528 at 543-544; Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd (2012) 201 FCR 173 at 202 [169], citing Purkess v Crittenden (1965) 114 CLR 164 at 168; Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd [No 2] (2012) 204 F......
  • Campaigntrack Pty Ltd v Real Estate Tool Box Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 19 July 2021
    ...1968 (Cth) ss 10, 13, 14, 22, 31, 32, 36, 101, 115 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 23.01 Cases cited: Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd (2012) 201 FCR 173 Ancher, Mortlock, Murray & Woolley Pty Ltd v Hooker Homes Pty Ltd (1971) 20 FLR 481 Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats ......
  • Civil Air Operations Officers Association of Australia v Airservices Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 November 2020
    ...19(1), 21 Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) s 170MH Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 13.01 Cases cited: Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 16; (2012) 201 FCR 173 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v ALS Industrial Australia Pty Ltd (2015) ......
  • QAD Inc v Shepparton Partners Collective Operations Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 8 June 2021
    ...36, 37, 115 Explanatory Memorandum, US Free Trade Agreement Implementation Bill 2004 (Cth) Cases cited: Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd (2012) 201 FCR 173 Amalgamated Mining Services Pty Ltd v Warman International Ltd (1992) 111 ALR 269 Australian Blue Metal Ltd v Hughes [1963] AC 74 Australi......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
5 books & journal articles
  • Managing Ownership of Copyright in Research Publications to Increase the Public Benefits from Research
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 52-1, March 2024
    • 1 March 2024
    ...the Authors of Collaborative Work(Cambridge University Press, 2019).130. Copyright Act (n 16) s 10(1).131. Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 16; (2012) 201 FCR 173.132. Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 984; (2010)189 FCR 109......
  • Managing Ownership of Copyright in Research Publications to Increase the Public Benefits from Research
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 52-1, March 2024
    • 1 March 2024
    ...the Authors of Collaborative Work(Cambridge University Press, 2019).130. Copyright Act (n 16) s 10(1).131. Acohs Pty Ltd v Ucorp Pty Ltd [2012] FCAFC 16; (2012) 201 FCR 173.132. Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd v Reed International Books Australia Pty Ltd [2010] FCA 984; (2010)189 FCR 109......
  • The vanishing author in computer-generated works: a critical analysis of recent Australian case law.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 3, December 2012
    • 1 December 2012
    ...(2) (2009) 239 CLR 458. (3) (2010) 264 ALR 617, affd (2010) 194 FCR 142 ('Phone Directories (Appeal)'). (4) (2010) 86 IPR 492, arid (2012) 201 FCR 173 ('Acohs (5) IceTV (2009) 239 CLR 458, 470 [23] (French CJ, Crennan and Kiefel JJ). (6) For example, real estate auction results, transport t......
  • RIGHTS IN GEOSPATIAL INFORMATION: A SHIFTING LEGAL TERRAIN.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 3, April 2018
    • 1 April 2018
    ...67) 470-1 [22]-[26]. (123) Phone Directories (n 121) 171 [89]-[90] (Keane CJ), 173-4 [104] (Perram J), 181 [130] (Yates J). (124) (2012) 201 FCR 173, 184-5 (125) See Peter Knight, 'Copyright in Databases and Computer Programs: Why Is It So Hard to Understand?' (2010) 21 Australian Intellect......
  • Get Started for Free