Actew Corporation Ltd v Pangallo

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Neutral Citation[2002] FCAFC 325,2002-1028 FCA A
Date2002
Year2002

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • White Industries Aust Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • White Industries Aust Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 11 April 2007
    ...s 39B(1), (1A) Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 31A Federal Court Rules O 20 r 2; O 33 r 12 ACTEW Corporation v Pangallo (2002) 127 FCR 1 Alphapharm Pty Ltd v Merck & Co Inc [2006] FCA 1227 cited Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 discussed Australian Broa......
  • Wenkart v Pantzer
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Soliman v University of Technology, Sydney
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 October 2008
    ...Act 1987 (NSW) University of Technology, Sydney, Act 1989 (NSW) Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) ACTEW Corporation Ltd v Pangallo (2002) 127 FCR 1; [2002] FCAFC 325 Ambulance Service Victoria (South Western Region) v Australian Liquor, Hospitality & Miscellaneous Workers Union (1998) 80 I......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • Federal Collective Bargaining after Electrolux
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 34-1, March 2006
    • 1 March 2006
    ...Union v AIRC (2001) 203 CLR 645, 658 [34]. 125 Gregory v Philip Morris Ltd (1987) 77 ALR 79, 93; ACTEW Corporation Ltd v Pangallo (2002) 127 FCR 1, 17–8 [33] (Whitlam and Gyles JJ); James Macken et al, The Law of Employment (5th ed, 2002) 586–8; Creighton and Stewart, above n 9, ch 7. 126 W......