Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 1992 |
| Neutral Citation | [1992] HCA 10,1992-0409 HCA A |
| Date | 1992 |
| Year | 1992 |
| Court | High Court |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
577 cases
-
X v Australian Prudential Regulation Authority
...to avoid.’ 18 In argument in this Court, reference was made to the declaratory relief granted against the respondent in Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission13. But, in Ainsworth, the jurisdictional error of the Commission lay in its denial of procedural fairness to the appellants, and in......
- Elliott v Seymour (No 3)
- Barclay v the Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education
- Secretary, Department of Health and Ageing v Pagasa Australia Pty Ltd
Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
-
Damages on 'no-transaction' basis
...McKenna; Hunter and New England Local Health District v Simon [2014] HCA 44 at [29]-[32] 15See Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 at 581-582 per Mason CJ and Dawson, Toohey and Gaudron JJ. 16In Anjin No. 13 Pty Ltd v Allianz Australian Insurance Limited [2009] VSC 37......
15 books & journal articles
-
Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
...152 CLR 570,591, 603; Mellifont v Attorney-General (Qld) (1991) 173 CLR 289, 303, 316, 321–2; Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564 ('Ainsworth'), 582. 94 (2002) 209 CLR 372 ('Re McBain'). 95 Ibid 382 (Gleeson CJ), citing In re Judiciary and Navigation Acts (1921) 29 CL......
-
Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
...entirely. 88 See generally Wheeler, above n 36, 463–66; Brennan, above n 46, 26–27; Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564, 585 (Brennan J). 89 Craig v South Australia (1995) 184 CLR 163, 179; Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs v Yusuf (2001) 206 CLR 323,......
-
Litigation
...were discussed in Chapter 13. 606 he jurisdiction to grant a declaration is extremely wide: Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564; Smith v Coastivity Pty Ltd [2008] NSWSC 313 at [80], McDougall J. (“Well may we ask rhetorically of declarations as Homer Simpson asked of ......
-
Of Kings and Officers — The Judicial Development of Public Law
...of right is now seen as being within the inherent jurisdiction of a superior court: see Ainsworth v Criminal Justice Commission (1992) 175 CLR 564, 581–2. As such the remedy may not properly be described as 'equitable', being a remedy also available from a common law court. 109 See Lord Woo......
Get Started for Free