Air Link Pty Ltd v Paterson; Paterson v Air Link Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | Gleeson CJ,McHugh,Gummow,Hayne,Heydon JJ,Kirby J.,Callinan J. |
| Judgment Date | 10 August 2005 |
| Neutral Citation | [2005] HCA 39,2005-0810 HCA B |
| Court | High Court |
| Docket Number | S420/2004 and S57/2005 |
| Date | 10 August 2005 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
15 cases
-
MN and Others (Ahmadis- country conditions - risk) Pakistan CG
...and unexceptional or proselytising and quiet Ahmadis relying on NABI v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs & Anor [2005] HCA 39. (v) A further authority NAEB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCAFC 79 indicated the correct approach whe......
-
Sweedman v Transport Accident Commission
...of the cause of action but is on occasions used less rigidly. ‘Cause of action’ itself does not have a fixed meaning. As I said in Air Link Pty Ltd v Paterson74: ‘It is true that lawyers usually tend to think of a cause of action as the label to be given to the category of claims within whi......
Get Started for Free
3 books & journal articles
-
The 2017 Winterton Lecture. Sir Owen Dixon Today
...70. 90 (1934) 51 CLR 217, 236-42, 256-8; [1934] HCA 18. 91 (1931) 45 CLR 359, 377-8. 92 Air Link v Paterson (2005) 223 CLR 283, [143]; [2005] HCA 39. 93 (1933) 48 CLR 457 at 476-7; [1933] HCA 25. 94 (2008) 236 CLR 342, [2]; [2008] HCA 22. 44 incurred in the creation of the fund, a secured c......
-
AN INTERNATIONALIST APPROACH TO INTERPRETING PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW? ARBITRATION AND SALES LAW IN AUSTRALIA.
...them effect and explains the existence of the inconsistency provisions as clarificatory in nature. (234) Air Link Pty Ltd v Paterson (2005) 223 CLR 283, 301 [40]. See also Parkes Shire Council v South West Helicopters Pty Ltd (2019) 266 CLR 212, 226 [36] (Kiefel CJ, Bell, Keane and Edelman ......
-
Outside the Text: Inside the use of Extrinsic Materials in Statutory Interpretation
...Kiefel and Bell JJ); Carr v The State of Western Australia (2007) 232 CLR 138, 142–3 [5] (Gleeson CJ); Airlink Pty Ltd v Paterson (2005) 223 CLR 283, 311 [79] (Kirby J). However a contrary view that the purposive approach is not mandatory has been suggested recently: Justice Michael Barker,......