Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
JudgeCrennan,Bell,Gageler JJ.,Kiefel,Keane JJ.
Judgment Date05 November 2014
Neutral Citation[2014] HCA 42
Date05 November 2014
Docket NumberS97/2014
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Esso Australia Pty Ltd(Appellant) v The Australian Workers' Union
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 6 December 2017
    ...503 at 519 [39]; [2012] HCA 55; Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S (2014) 254 CLR 247 at 265–266 [42] per Crennan, Bell and Gageler JJ; [2014] HCA 42. See also Tabcorp Holdings Ltd v Victoria (2016) 90 ALJR 376 at 379 [8], 389 [77], 390 [86]–[87]; 328 ALR 375 at 378, 391, 393; [2016] HCA 2......
  • Berkeley Challenge Pty Ltd v United Voice
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 1 July 2020
    ...of the Act. His Honour also noted at [21] the comments of the High Court in Alphapharm Pty Limited v H Lundbeck A/S (2014) 254 CLR 247; [2014] HCA 42 that the task of statutory construction may also require some appreciation of the pre-existing law.69 Berkley submitted that the historical o......
  • Drury on behalf of the Nanda People v State of Western Australia
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 21 April 2020
    ...of contextual matters should not deflect the Court from what is a 'text-based activity': Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2014] HCA 42; (2014) 254 CLR 247 at [42]. Hence the warnings that matters of context should not be used to displace the clear meaning of the text: Alcan (NT) Alumina......
  • Fair Work Ombudsman v Spotless Services Australia Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 January 2019
    ...Media Holdings Ltd [2012] HCA 55; (2012) 250 CLR 503 at [39]. It also includes pre-existing law: Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S [2014] HCA 42; (2014) 254 CLR 247 at [42]. In an appropriate case where examination of contextual materials discloses an evident mischief that the statute was......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • The High Court confirms extensions of time for patent term extensions
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 14 November 2014
    ...to extend the time within which to apply for a pharmaceutical patent term extension under s70(1) - Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A-S [2014] HCA 42 (5 November To compensate patent owners for the lengthy period required to obtain regulatory and marketing approval for new drugs, the Austral......
  • Missed an Australian patent deadline? Here is what you do
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 28 October 2017
    ...Examiners Manual, 3.11.1.3.5 xxv Patents Regulations 1991, Reg 2.2, 2.2A, 2.2B, 2.2C and 2.2D xxvi Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A-S [2014] HCA 42 The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific...

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT