Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ
Judgment Date06 September 2012
Neutral Citation2012-0906 HCA A,[2012] HCA 30
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberM48/2012
Date06 September 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
61 cases
  • Bank South Pacific Limited v Robert Tingke (2012) N4901
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 29 Octubre 2012
    ...Ltd [1915] AC 79 AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin [1986] HCA 83; (1986) 162 CLR 170 Andrews v. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30 Lloyds Bank Ltd v. Bundy [1974] 3 All ER 757 Counsel: K.R. Kawat, for the Plaintiff/Applicant No Appearance, for the Defendant/Respondent 29t......
  • Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis
    • United Kingdom
    • Supreme Court
    • 4 Noviembre 2015
    ...departure from the previous understanding of the law occurred with the decision of the High Court of Australia in Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205. The background to this case was very similar to that in Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc [2......
  • Lucio Robert Paciocco and Another v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 27 Julio 2016
    ...Group Ltd (2011) 211 FCR 53 at 140–142. 9 (2008) 257 ALR 292. 10Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205; [2012] HCA 30. 11Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205 at 219 12 The primary judge, consistently with her finding in A......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
23 firm's commentaries
  • Time Bars In An International Context
    • United Kingdom
    • Mondaq UK
    • 26 Noviembre 2015
    ...the situation might be slightly different. There was a High Court decision, Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30, which although it related to the enforceability or otherwise of a banking overdraft facility, caused many commentators[10] to suggest that it migh......
  • Is your default interest clause enforceable, or is it a penalty?: The importance of careful drafting
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 Febrero 2020
    ...Limited (1914) AC 79 (Dunlop). See also Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Pty Ltd (2005) 224 CLR 656, Andrews v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30 and Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 2 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 at 446. 3 Dunlop at 86-87. 4 Dunl......
  • Andrews v ANZ - One year on and still no certainty
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 4 Septiembre 2013
    ...Andrews receive detailed judicial consideration, significant uncertainty will remain. Footnotes 12012) 290 ALR 595; (2012) 86 ALJR 1002; [2012] HCA 30. 2Exports Credits Guarantee Department v Universal Oil Products Co [1983] 1 WLR 399 at 402-4, cited with approval by Mason, Wilson and Dawso......
  • No knockout blow in bank fees class actions (<i>Paciocco v ANZ</i>)
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 24 Febrero 2014
    ...in the Paciocco case is informed by the High Court's subsequent judgment in Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30 (Andrews HC). HISTORY OF THE BANK FEES CLASS ACTIONS 22 September 2010: First bank fees class action filed against ANZ. 5 December 2011: Justice Go......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
  • Contract law reform: Legislators or judges – or both?
    • South Africa
    • Juta Acta Juridica No. , August 2021
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...r ule revis ited’ (2016) 132 LQR 382. Th is is ak in to the lang uage used in Andrews v Austra lia and New Zeal and Banking G roup Ltd [2012] HCA 30, (2012) 247 CLR 20 5.55 JC Fisher ‘Rea rticu lating t he rule ag ainst pen alty cl auses’ 2016 LMCLQ 169–75 at 171. © Juta and Company (Pty) L......
  • Lecture
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2017, December 2017
    • 1 Diciembre 2017
    ...Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[2015] UKSC 67 at [36]–[39], [162]–[170] and [218]. 23Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group[2012] HCA 30; (2012) 247 CLR 205. 24Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[2015] UKSC 67 at [31]. 25Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[......
  • Good faith and Post-Repudiation Conduct
    • Australia
    • University of Western Australia Law Review No. 40-1, December 2015
    • 1 Diciembre 2015
    ...he concluded, ‘some general equitable principle or element of public policy’54 51In the High Court case of Andrews v ANZ [2012] HCA 30 it was confirmed that even without being triggered by a breach, a term in a contract may still constitute a penalty clause. The argument that can be made he......
  • Contract law reform: Legislators or judges – or both?
    • South Africa
    • Juta Acta Juridica No. , August 2021
    • 23 Agosto 2021
    ...r ule revis ited’ (2016) 132 LQR 382. Th is is ak in to the lang uage used in Andrews v Austra lia and New Zeal and Banking G roup Ltd [2012] HCA 30, (2012) 247 CLR 20 5.55 JC Fisher ‘Rea rticu lating t he rule ag ainst pen alty cl auses’ 2016 LMCLQ 169–75 at 171. © Juta and Company (Pty) 7......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT