Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | High Court |
| Judge | French CJ,Gummow,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ |
| Judgment Date | 06 September 2012 |
| Neutral Citation | 2012-0906 HCA A,[2012] HCA 30 |
| Docket Number | M48/2012 |
| Date | 06 September 2012 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
53 cases
-
Bank South Pacific Limited v Robert Tingke (2012) N4901
...Ltd [1915] AC 79 AMEV-UDC Finance Ltd v Austin [1986] HCA 83; (1986) 162 CLR 170 Andrews v. Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30 Lloyds Bank Ltd v. Bundy [1974] 3 All ER 757 Counsel: K.R. Kawat, for the Plaintiff/Applicant No Appearance, for the Defendant/Respondent 29t......
-
Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi; ParkingEye Ltd v Beavis
...departure from the previous understanding of the law occurred with the decision of the High Court of Australia in Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205. The background to this case was very similar to that in Office of Fair Trading v Abbey National plc [2......
-
Lucio Robert Paciocco and Another v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd
...Group Ltd (2011) 211 FCR 53 at 140–142. 9 (2008) 257 ALR 292. 10Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205; [2012] HCA 30. 11Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd (2012) 247 CLR 205 at 219 12 The primary judge, consistently with her finding in A......
Request a trial to view additional results
23 firm's commentaries
-
Time Bars In An International Context
...the situation might be slightly different. There was a High Court decision, Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30, which although it related to the enforceability or otherwise of a banking overdraft facility, caused many commentators[10] to suggest that it migh......
-
Is your default interest clause enforceable, or is it a penalty?: The importance of careful drafting
...Limited (1914) AC 79 (Dunlop). See also Ringrow Pty Ltd v BP Australia Pty Ltd (2005) 224 CLR 656, Andrews v ANZ Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30 and Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 2 Legione v Hateley (1983) 152 CLR 406 at 446. 3 Dunlop at 86-87. 4 Dunl......
-
Andrews v ANZ - One year on and still no certainty
...Andrews receive detailed judicial consideration, significant uncertainty will remain. Footnotes 12012) 290 ALR 595; (2012) 86 ALJR 1002; [2012] HCA 30. 2Exports Credits Guarantee Department v Universal Oil Products Co [1983] 1 WLR 399 at 402-4, cited with approval by Mason, Wilson and Dawso......
-
No knockout blow in bank fees class actions (<i>Paciocco v ANZ</i>)
...in the Paciocco case is informed by the High Court's subsequent judgment in Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2012] HCA 30 (Andrews HC). HISTORY OF THE BANK FEES CLASS ACTIONS 22 September 2010: First bank fees class action filed against ANZ. 5 December 2011: Justice Go......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 books & journal articles
-
Lecture
...Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[2015] UKSC 67 at [36]–[39], [162]–[170] and [218]. 23Andrews v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group[2012] HCA 30; (2012) 247 CLR 205. 24Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[2015] UKSC 67 at [31]. 25Cavendish Square Holding BV v Talal El Makdessi[......
-
Contract law reform: Legislators or judges – or both?
...r ule revis ited’ (2016) 132 LQR 382. Th is is ak in to the lang uage used in Andrews v Austra lia and New Zeal and Banking G roup Ltd [2012] HCA 30, (2012) 247 CLR 20 5.55 JC Fisher ‘Rea rticu lating t he rule ag ainst pen alty cl auses’ 2016 LMCLQ 169–75 at 171. © Juta and Company (Pty) L......
-
Good faith and Post-Repudiation Conduct
...he concluded, ‘some general equitable principle or element of public policy’54 51In the High Court case of Andrews v ANZ [2012] HCA 30 it was confirmed that even without being triggered by a breach, a term in a contract may still constitute a penalty clause. The argument that can be made he......
-
Contract law reform: Legislators or judges – or both?
...r ule revis ited’ (2016) 132 LQR 382. Th is is ak in to the lang uage used in Andrews v Austra lia and New Zeal and Banking G roup Ltd [2012] HCA 30, (2012) 247 CLR 20 5.55 JC Fisher ‘Rea rticu lating t he rule ag ainst pen alty cl auses’ 2016 LMCLQ 169–75 at 171. © Juta and Company (Pty) 7......