Antoun v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Kirby J,Hayne J,Callinan J,Heydon J
Judgment Date08 February 2006
Neutral Citation[2006] HCA 2,2006-0208 HCA A
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS299/2005 & S300/2005 Matter No S300/2005
Date08 February 2006
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
60 cases
1 firm's commentaries
  • Where next for New Acland coal mine Stage 3 expansion project?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 2 October 2019
    ...Crennan JJ in Concrete Pty Ltd v Parramatta Design & Developments Pty Ltd (2006) 229 CLR 577; [2006] HCA 55, and Antoun v The Queen (2006) 80 ALJR 497; [2006] HCA 3 At [103]. The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice shou......
4 books & journal articles
  • Table of Cases
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Forensic Investigations and Miscarriages of Justice. The Rhetoric Meets The Reality Part Three
    • 15 June 2010
    ...176 Anthony v. R., [2005] EWCA Crim 952 ....................................................................... 252 Antoun v. he Queen, [2006] HCA 2 .......................................................................... 161 Associated Provincial Picture Houses v. Wednesbury Corporation,......
  • Noticeboard
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 10-3, July 2006
    • 1 July 2006
    ...law, a criminal defendant has a right to anTHE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 227NOTICEBOARD impartial tribunal. In Antoun vR[2006] HCA 2 the defendants were denied thisright when the trial judge refused to recuse himself on the grounds of apparentbias. The defendants had elected......
  • Noticeboard
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 10-3, July 2006
    • 1 July 2006
    ...law, a criminal defendant has a right to anTHE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 227NOTICEBOARD impartial tribunal. In Antoun vR[2006] HCA 2 the defendants were denied thisright when the trial judge refused to recuse himself on the grounds of apparentbias. The defendants had elected......
  • THE UNSTABLE PROVINCE OF JURY FACT-FINDING: EVIDENCE EXCLUSION, PROBATIVE VALUE AND JUDICIAL RESTRAINT AFTER IMM V. THE QUEEN.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 41 No. 2, December 2017
    • 1 December 2017
    ...would be unsafe and unsatisfactory: Doney (n 78) 214-15. See also Asche (n 86) 419. (97) R v R (n 74) 84. (98) Antoun v The Queen (2006) 224 ALR 51, 77 [86] (Callinan J). Note that Callinan J also expresses the view that the trial judge should be permitted to take a more robust approach: at......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT