AOU21 v Minister for Home Affairs

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date27 April 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCAFC 60
Date27 April 2021
CourtFederal Court
AOU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 60


Federal Court of Australia


AOU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 60

Appealed from:

Federal Circuit Court of Australia



File number:

NSD 1355 of 2020

NSD 1378 of 2020



Judgment of:

GRIFFITHS, MORTIMER AND PERRY JJ



Date of judgment:

27 April 2021



Catchwords:

MIGRATION – applicant brought to Australia under repealed s 198E of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) for medical treatment – whether the applicant no longer needed to be in Australia for the temporary purpose pursuant to s 198AH(1A)(c) – appeal proceeding dismissed – in original jurisdiction proceeding whether the three preconditions in s 198AH(1A) met – whether the duty in s 198AD(2) engaged – the meaning of “reasonably practicable” pursuant to s 198AD(2) – declaratory relief granted



Legislation:

Constitution s 75(v)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 20(1A), 27, 37AF(1), 37AG(1)(a)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 4.12

Home Affairs Legislation Amendment (Miscellaneous Measures) Act 2019 (Cth)

Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 189, 195A, 196, 197C, 198AA, 198, 198(1A), 198(11), 198B, 198C(2), 198AD(2), 198AD(3), 198AD(5), 198AD(11), 198AH(1), 198AH(1A), 198C, 198D, 198E, 198F, 199A

Public Service Act 1999 (Cth) s 20



Convention Relating to the Status of Refugees, opened for signature 28 July 1951, 189 UNTS 137 (entered into force 22 April 1954)



Cases cited:

AJL20 v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] FCA 1305

Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37; 219 CLR 562

Australian Heritage Commission v Mount Isa Mines Limited [1995] FCA 947; 60 FCR 456

Australian Heritage Commission v Mount Isa Mines Limited [1997] HCA 10; 187 CLR 297

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; 247 CLR 347

Blatch v Archer [1774] EngR 2; 98 ER 969

Burgess v Commonwealth [2020] FCA 670; 276 FCR 548

Cabal v Attorney-General of the Commonwealth [2001] FCA 583; 113 FCR 154

Commonwealth v Fernando [2012] FCAFC 18; 200 FCR 1

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Anglo American Australia Limited [2019] FCAFC 109; 271 FCR 22

Corporation of the City of Enfield v Development Assessment Commission [2000] HCA 5; 199 CLR 135

Dien v Manager of Immigration Detention Centre at Port Hedland [1993] WASC 579; 115 FLR 416

G v H [1994] HCA 48; 181 CLR 387

Guo v Commonwealth of Australia [2017] FCA 1355; 258 FCR 31

Hicks v Ruddock [2007] FCA 299; 156 FCR 574

Lewis v Australian Capital Territory [2020] HCA 26; 94 ALJR 740

M38/2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 131; 131 FCR 146

McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 223

NATB v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2003] FCAFC 292; 133 FCR 506

Plaintiff M47/2018 v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] HCA 17; 265 CLR 285

Plaintiff M70/2011 v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2011] HCA 32; 244 CLR 144

Plaintiff M96A/2016 v Commonwealth of Australia [2017] HCA 16; 261 CLR 582

Plaintiff S4/2014 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 34; 253 CLR 219

R v PLV [2001] NSWCCA 282; 51 NSWLR 736

Re Media, Entertainment and Arts Alliance; Ex Parte Hoyts Corporation Pty Ltd [1993] HCA 40; 178 CLR 379

Reysson Pty Ltd v Minister Administering the Environmental Planning and Assessment Act 1979 [2020] NSWCA 281

Ruddock v Taylor [2005] HCA 48; 222 CLR 612

State of New South Wales v TD [2013] NSWCA 32; 83 NSWLR 566

sub nom Truong v Immigration Detention Centre, Port Hedland (Sup Ct, WA, Malcolm CJ, Seaman and Ipp JJ, 24 June 1993); 31 ALD 729

SZSSJ v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (No 2) [2015] FCAFC 125; 234 FCR 1

Tanioria v Commonwealth [2016] FCA 1253

Timbarra Protection Coalition Inc v Ross Mining NL [1999] NSWCA 8; 46 NSWLR 55

WKMZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 55



Division:

General Division



Registry:

New South Wales



National Practice Area:

Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights



Number of paragraphs:

234



Date of last submissions:

29 March 2021



Date of hearing:

19 March 2021



Counsel for the Applicant/Appellant:

Mr G Johnson



Solicitor for the Applicant/Appellant:

Sydney West Legal And Migration



Counsel for the Respondents:

Mr G Kennett SC with Mr P Macliver



Solicitor for the Respondents:

Australian Government Solicitor



ORDERS


NSD 1355 of 2020

BETWEEN:

AOU21

Appellant


AND:

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS

First Respondent


MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

Second Respondent



order made by:

GRIFFITHS, MORTIMER AND PERRY JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

27 April 2021



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The appeal be dismissed.

  2. The parties file submissions on appropriate costs orders in the appeal on or before 4pm on 4 May 2021.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.



ORDERS


NSD 1378 of 2020

BETWEEN:

AOU21

Applicant


AND:

MINISTER FOR HOME AFFAIRS

First Respondent


MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP, MIGRANT SERVICES AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

Second Respondent


COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Third Respondent



order made by:

GRIFFITHS, MORTIMER AND PERRY JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

27 April 2021


THE COURT DECLARES THAT:




  1. The applicant no longer needs to be in Australia for the temporary purpose for which he was brought to Australia.

  2. All of the preconditions in s 198AH(1A) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) are met in respect of the applicant.

  3. Section 198AH(1) applies to the applicant.


THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The applicant’s claims for:

    1. an order that the applicant be released from detention forthwith;

    2. an order in the nature of prohibition preventing any officer from detaining the applicant pursuant to...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • BHL19 v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 April 2021
    ...FCA 546 AJL20 v Commonwealth [2020] FCA 1305 Al-Kateb v Godwin (2004) 219 CLR 562; [2004] HCA 37 AOU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 60 BHL19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (2020) 277 FCR 420; [2020] FCAFC 94 BHL19 v Minister f......
  • FJE20 v Minister for Home Affairs
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 24 March 2022
    ...cited: Abebe v Commonwealth [1999] HCA 14; 197 CLR 510 Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37; 219 CLR 562 AOU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 60 Apache Northwest Pty Ltd v Newcrest Mining Ltd [2009] FCAFC 39; 182 FCR 124 Bienstein v Bienstein [2003] HCA 7 Bodruddaza v Minister for Immi......
  • MZZHL v Commonwealth of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 7 June 2021
    ...AJL20 v Commonwealth of Australia [2020] FCA 1305 Al-Kateb v Godwin [2004] HCA 37, (2004) 219 CLR 562 AOU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 60 Arthur as litigation representative for CYG20 v Commonwealth of Australia [2021] FCA 259 ASP15 v Commonwealth [2016] FCAFC 145, (2016) 248 ......
  • Ahmad v Attorney-General (Cth)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 27 October 2022
    ...Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 11.1(1), 307.2(1) Crimes Regulations 2019 (Cth) sch 1 form 8 Cases cited: AOU21 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 60 Australian Broadcasting Tribunal v Bond (Bond Media Case) [1990] HCA 33; (1990) 170 CLR 321 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [1938] HCA 34; (1938) 60 CLR......
  • Get Started for Free