Apla Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (Nsw)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeGleeson CJ,Heydon J,McHugh J,Gummow J,Kirby J,Hayne J,Callinan J
Judgment Date01 September 2005
Neutral Citation2005-0901 HCA A,[2005] HCA 44
CourtHigh Court
Docket NumberS202/2004
Date01 September 2005
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
95 cases
  • Nsw Council for Civil Liberties Inc. v Classification Review Board (No. 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Attorney-General (Vic) v Andrews
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 21 March 2007
    ...business not extending beyond the limits of the State concerned 36. 86 As was pointed out by Gleeson CJ and Heydon J in APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW)37: ‘Inconsistency between a State law and a federal law does not spring from the political motives of the respective law-makin......
  • South Australia v Totani
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 11 November 2010
    ...Act, s 35(1)(a). 31 As to extraterritorial legislative competence of State Parliaments see APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 224 CLR 322 at 354 [40] per Gleeson CJ and Heydon J, 388–389 [154]–[159] per Gummow J (Hayne J agreeing at 449 [375]), 482–483 [465]–[466] per Calli......
  • Kennon v Spry
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 December 2008
    ...70 At [97]. 71 See Re Macks; Ex parte Saint (2000) 204 CLR 158 at 186 [54]; [2000] HCA 62; APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 224 CLR 322 at 406 [231]; [2005] HCA 44. 72 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Carey (No 6) (2006) 153 FCR 509 at 519 [30]. 73 CPT C......
  • Get Started for Free
35 books & journal articles
  • Mandatory sentencing for people smuggling: issues of law and policy.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 36 No. 2, August 2012
    • 1 August 2012
    ...Co Ltd v New South Wales Crime Commission (2009) 240 CLR 319, 353 [52] (French CJ). (284) APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 224 CLR 322, 411 [247] (Gummow (285) See above nn 85-94 and accompanying text. (286) Santow, above n 6, 298-9. (287) R v Nitu [2012] QCA 224 (24 Augu......
  • The Centralisation of Judicial Power within the Australian Federal System
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • 1 June 2014
    ...of rights protection in the Victorian Charter of Human Rights and Responsi bilities 68 APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 224 CLR 322, 406, citing Northern Territory v GPAO (1999) 196 CLR 553, 575, 628; Residual Assco Group Ltd v Spalvins ( 2000) 202 CLR 629, 642; Solomons ......
  • Alexander Meiklejohn, American Constitutional Law, and Australia's Implied Freedom of Political Communication
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 34-3, September 2006
    • 1 September 2006
    ...of Political Communication' (1999) 23 Melbourne University Law Review 668. 44 See APLA Ltd v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 79 ALJR 1620, 219 ALR 403 ('APLA'); Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission (2004) 220 CLR 181; Roberts v Bass (2002) 212 CLR 1; Australian Broadcasting......
  • The Constitutional (In)Validity of Religious Vilification Laws: Implications for their Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 34-2, June 2006
    • 1 June 2006
    ...220 CLR 1, 48–50 (McHugh J), 77–9 (Gummow and Hayne JJ), 82, 88–9 (Kirby J). See also APLA Limited v Legal Services Commissioner (NSW) (2005) 219 ALR 403, 420 (McHugh J), 456 (Gummow J) ('APLA'). For a discussion, see Nicholas Aroney, 'Justice McHugh, Representative Government and the Elimi......
  • Get Started for Free

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT