Apotex Pty Ltd v Servier Laboratories (Aust) Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2013-1224 FCA A
Year2013
Date2013
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 cases
  • Sequenom, Inc. v Ariosa Diagnostics, Inc.
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 27 Junio 2019
    ...(2008) 78 IPR 485 Apotex Pty Ltd v AstraZeneca AB (No 4) (2013) 100 IPR 285; [2013] FCA 162 Apotex Pty Ltd v Les Laboratories Servier [2013] FCA 1426 Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd (2013) 253 CLR 284 Apotex Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC (No 2) (2016) 122 IPR 17 Ari......
  • Pilkin v Sony Australia Limited (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 3 Junio 2019
    ...Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 102, 114, 117 Patents Regulations 1991 (Cth) reg 3.14 Cases cited: Apotex Pty Ltd v Les Laboratoires Servier [2013] FCA 1426 Damorgold Pty Limited v Blindware Pty Limited (2017) 130 IPR 1 Ho v Akai Pty Limited (in liq) (2006) 247 FCR 205 Meyers Taylor Pty Limited v......
4 firm's commentaries
  • What is in a name? The changing landscape of Australian Domain Names
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 27 Enero 2022
    ...Administration Rules: Licensing (16 February 2021), definition of 'Australian presence'. 2 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1426 3 Ibid r 2.6 ('reserved names'). 4 auDA, The priority allocation process, https://www.auda.org.au/au-domain-names/au-direct/priority-allocatio......
  • What is in a name? The changing landscape of Australian Domain Names
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 27 Enero 2022
    ...Administration Rules: Licensing (16 February 2021), definition of 'Australian presence'. 2 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1426 3 Ibid r 2.6 ('reserved names'). 4 auDA, The priority allocation process, https://www.auda.org.au/au-domain-names/au-direct/priority-allocatio......
  • How best method became a major pitfall for foreign (and domestic) patent owners in Australia
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 21 Enero 2022
    ...actions in Australia. Footnotes 1 Section 40(2)(aa) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) 2 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1426 [179]. 3 Ibid [141]. 4 Ibid [177]. 5 Ibid [250]. 6 Ibid [243] (in obiter). 7 BlueScope v Dongkuk (No 2) [2019] FCA 2117 8 Ibid [1336]. 9 Ibid [1511]-......
  • How best method became a major pitfall for foreign (and domestic) patent owners in Australia
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 21 Enero 2022
    ...actions in Australia. Footnotes 1 Section 40(2)(aa) of the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) 2 Les Laboratoires Servier v Apotex Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 1426 [179]. 3 Ibid [141]. 4 Ibid [177]. 5 Ibid [250]. 6 Ibid [243] (in obiter). 7 BlueScope v Dongkuk (No 2) [2019] FCA 2117 8 Ibid [1336]. 9 Ibid [1511]-......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT