Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Company Ltd
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Neutral Citation | [2011] FCAFC 156 |
Date | 2011 |
Year | 2011 |
Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
113 cases
- Embertec Pty Ltd v Energy Efficient Technologies Pty Ltd
- Alcock v Commonwealth
- Snack Foods Ltd v Premier 1st Pty Ltd
-
Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd
...FCA 980; 177 ALR 231; 49 IPR 225 Rush v Nationwide News Pty Limited (No 5) [2018] FCA 1622 Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238 Sandvik Intellectual Property AB v Quarry Mining & Construction Equipment Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 236 Sandvik Intellectual Property......
Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries
-
Reckitt Benckiser Throws Cold Water On Procter & Gamble's New "30 Minute Miracle" Dishwashing Tablet
...Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Procter & Gamble Australia Pty Limited [2023] FCA 383 at [134], citing Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238 at The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soug......
-
Being litigation ready: Getting Australian patent ownership and licensing right
...11 Patents Act 1990 (Cth), Schedule 1 - Dictionary. 12 Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156 (30 November 2011), applying Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide ......
-
Will "hot-tubbing" catch on in England and Wales?
...the Federal Court of Australia, hot-tubbing was used despite there being numerous experts (Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v. Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156). There is, therefore, no rule as to when hot-tubbing is appropriate. Judges will need to assess the appropriateness of hot-tubbing on a ......
-
STOP in the name of the law - interlocutory injunctions
...Christmas. Footnotes 1 Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited [2011] FCA 1164 2 Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156 3 Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited [2011] HCATrans The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subjec......
Request a trial to view additional results