Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Company Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [2011] FCAFC 156 |
| Year | 2011 |
| Date | 2011 |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
116 cases
- Embertec Pty Ltd v Energy Efficient Technologies Pty Ltd
- Alcock v Commonwealth
- Snack Foods Ltd v Premier 1st Pty Ltd
-
KTC v David
...Electronics Australia Pty Limited (2009) 176 FCR 66; [2009] FCA 320 Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238; [2011] FCAFC 156 Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2005] FCA 142 Shelton v National Roads and Motorists Association Ltd (2004) 51 ACSR 278; [2004] FCA 1393......
Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries
-
Reckitt Benckiser Throws Cold Water On Procter & Gamble's New "30 Minute Miracle" Dishwashing Tablet
...Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Procter & Gamble Australia Pty Limited [2023] FCA 383 at [134], citing Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238 at The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soug......
-
STOP in the name of the law - interlocutory injunctions
...Christmas. Footnotes 1 Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited [2011] FCA 1164 2 Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156 3 Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited [2011] HCATrans The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subjec......
-
A need for Rescue of traders who borrow aspects of the get up of competitor products
...or 'relatively strong' in all of the circumstances in accordance with the principles in Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156, resulting in finding that the balance of convenience favoured the grant of the interlocutory The Full Court also rejected Martin's contentio......
-
Limeburst v Freshburst? Application for finger limes interlocutory falls flat
...J relied on the traditional principles most recently expounded by the Full Federal Court in Samsung Electronics Co Limited v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156. Namely, in order to secure an interlocutory injunction, the applicant must show there is a serious question to be tried or that there is a......
Get Started for Free