Your World of Legal Intelligence
 Australia | 1-800-335-6202

Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Company Ltd

Cited authorities 37 Cited in 127 Precedent Map Related
Vincent
JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[2011] FCAFC 156
Date2011
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
113 cases
  • Embertec Pty Ltd v Energy Efficient Technologies Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Alcock v Commonwealth
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Snack Foods Ltd v Premier 1st Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • KTC v David
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 13 April 2022
    ...Electronics Australia Pty Limited (2009) 176 FCR 66; [2009] FCA 320 Samsung Electronics Company Ltd v Apple Inc (2011) 217 FCR 238; [2011] FCAFC 156 Seven Network Limited v News Limited [2005] FCA 142 Shelton v National Roads and Motorists Association Ltd (2004) 51 ACSR 278; [2004] FCA 1393......
    • Request a trial to view additional results
7 firm's commentaries
  • Reckitt Benckiser Throws Cold Water On Procter & Gamble's New "30 Minute Miracle" Dishwashing Tablet
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 22 May 2023
    ...Home) Australia Pty Ltd v Procter & Gamble Australia Pty Limited [2023] FCA 383 at [134], citing Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v Apple Inc [2011] FCAFC 156; 217 FCR 238 at The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be soug......
  • Being litigation ready: Getting Australian patent ownership and licensing right
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 21 November 2016
    ...11 Patents Act 1990 (Cth), Schedule 1 - Dictionary. 12 Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156 (30 November 2011), applying Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Lenah Game Meats Pty Ltd (2001) 208 CLR The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide ......
  • Will "hot-tubbing" catch on in England and Wales?
    • United Kingdom
    • JD Supra United Kingdom
    • 1 August 2016
    ...the Federal Court of Australia, hot-tubbing was used despite there being numerous experts (Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v. Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156). There is, therefore, no rule as to when hot-tubbing is appropriate. Judges will need to assess the appropriateness of hot-tubbing on a ......
  • STOP in the name of the law - interlocutory injunctions
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 February 2012
    ...Christmas. Footnotes 1 Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited [2011] FCA 1164 2 Samsung Electronics Co. Limited v Apple Inc. [2011] FCAFC 156 3 Apple Inc. v Samsung Electronics Co. Limited [2011] HCATrans The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subjec......
    • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT