Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Limited (ACN 001 660 715) v D.A.P. Services (Kempsey) Pty Limited (in liquidation) (ACN 055 803 542)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date29 March 2007
Neutral Citation[2007] FCAFC 40
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Lewis v Australian Capital Territory
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 August 2020
    ...Pty Ltd [No 4] (2015) 241 FCR 271 at 288 [47]. Cf Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v DAP Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd (2007) 157 FCR 564 at 568-569 [26]–[28]. 212 Attorney General v Blake [2001] 1 AC 268 at 279. 213 “[I]s the claimant factually worse off … as a result of the wrong?”:......
  • Universal Music Publishing Pty Ltd v Palmer (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 April 2021
    ...v Ucorp Pty Ltd (No 5) [2013] FCA 1006; 103 IPR 51 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v DAP Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd (in liq) (2007) 157 FCR 564 Attorney-General (UK) v Blake [2001] 1 AC 268 Australasian Performing Rights Association Ltd v Monster Communications Pty Ltd [2006] FCA ......
  • Hoy Mobile Pty Ltd v Allphones Retail Pty Ltd (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 May 2008
    ...6A, 10, 11, 23(f) Allen v Tobias (1958) 98 CLR 36 applied Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v DAP Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd (2007) 157 FCR 564 cited Associated Alloys Pty Ltd v ACN 001 452 106 Pty Ltd (in liq) (2000) 202 CLR 588 cited Attorney General (NSW) v World Best Holdings Lt......
  • Skids Programme Management Ltd v Barbara Winsome McNeill Coa
    • New Zealand
    • Court of Appeal
    • 23 July 2012
    ...[704]. 37 At [30], citations omitted. 38 At [25]. 39 Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v DAP Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd (in liq) [2007] FCAFC 40. 40 At [45] and 41 At [116]. 42 Copyright Act 1994, s 121(2)(a). 43 Above n 42, s 121(2)(b). 44 Futuretronics.com.au Pty Ltd v Graphix Lab......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 firm's commentaries
  • User principle confirmed for assessing damages in Australian passing-off cases
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 11 February 2016
    ...passing off. In particular, they relied on the decision in Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd v DAP Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd ([2007] FCAFC 40), where Black CJ and Jacobson J said that damages, assessed on the basis of a reasonable royalty, are not available where it is established ......
1 books & journal articles
  • Management and Enforcement
    • Canada
    • Irwin Books Intellectual Property Law. Second Edition
    • 15 June 2011
    ...recipient who did nothing with it); compare Aristocrat Technologies Australia Pty Ltd. v. D.A.P. Services (Kempsey) Pty Ltd. (in liq.) , [2007] FCAFC 40 at [3]–[4] (Austl. Full Fed. Ct.) [ Aristocrat ] (nominal compensatory damages but $200,000 punitive damages for f‌lagrant infringement; s......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT