Ashby v Slipper

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Neutral Citation[2014] FCAFC 15
Year2013
Date2013

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
39 cases
  • Ford v Inghams Enterprises Pty Ltd (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 11 December 2020
    ...potential consequences, the stronger is the evidence required to conclude that the allegations have been established: Ashby v Slipper [2014] FCAFC 15 at In my view the applicant has not substantiated the aspect of his case referable to Agreed Issue 1(a). I have formed this view, taking into......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 10 November 2021
    ...Pty Limited v Demir (1975) 132 CLR 362 (at 370–371 per Gibbs J, Stephen J agreeing, Murphy J generally agreeing); Ashby v Slipper [2014] FCAFC 15; (2014) 219 FCR 322 (at 347 [77] per Mansfield and Gilmour JJ). 110 Although, of course, unchallenged evidence can be rejected if it is contradic......
  • Malone v State of Queensland (The Clermont-Belyando Area Native Title Claim) (No 5)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 December 2021
    ...v Sierra (2004) 79 ALJR 452; [2004] HCA 64 Aplin on behalf of the Waanyi Peoples v State of Queensland [2010] FCA 625 Ashby v Slipper (2014) 219 FCR 322; [2014] FCAFC 15 Ashwin on behalf of the Wutha People v State of Western Australia (No 4) [2019] FCA 308 Australian Executor Trustees (SA)......
  • Jadwan Pty Ltd v Rae & Partners (A Firm)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 April 2020
    ...64 FCR 73 Armory v Delamirie (1722) 1 Str 505; 93 ER 664 AS Bannister v Sirrom Enterprises Pty Ltd [2016] SASCFC 153 Ashby v Slipper [2014] FCAFC 15; 219 FCR 322 Badenach v Calvert [2016] HCA 18; 257 CLR 440 Bennett v Minister of Community Welfare [1992] HCA 27; 176 CLR 408 Benning v Wong (......
  • Get Started for Free
1 firm's commentaries
  • Parties in glass houses... Costs in general protection matters
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 28 January 2016
    ...Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Clarke [2008] FCAFC 143, (2008) 170 FCR 574 at [29]; Ashby v Slipper (No.2) [2014] FCAFC 67, (2014) 314 ALR 84 at [35]. 6 Ibid- per White J at paragraph 7 citing: Council of Kangan Batman Institute of Technology and Further Education v Australian Industri......