AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | [2014] FCAFC 99 |
| Year | 2014 |
| Date | 2014 |
| Court | Full Federal Court (Australia) |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
29 cases
-
InterPharma Pty Ltd v Hospira, Inc (No 5)
...96 IPR 185; 204 FCR 494 Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis Australia Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 50; 253 CLR 284 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99; 107 IPR 177; 226 FCR 324 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 30; 257 CLR 356 Austal Ships Sales Pty Ltd v Stena Rederi Aktiebolag [200......
-
Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd
...2) [2016] FCA 1238; 122 IPR 17 Aspirating IP Limited v Vision Systems Limited [2010] FCA 1061; 88 IPR 52 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99; 226 FCR 324 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 30; 257 CLR 356 Atlantis Corp Pty Ltd v Schindler (1997) 39 IPR 29 Austal Ships Sa......
-
Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health USA Inc v Elanco New Zealand
...1 All ER 673; [1962] RPC 55 Aspirating IP Ltd v Vision Systems Ltd [2010] FCA 1061; (2010) 88 IPR 52 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99; (2014) 226 FCR 324 Blair v Curran [1939] HCA 23; (1939) 62 CLR 464 British Acoustic Films Ltd v Nettlefold Productions Ltd (1935) 53 RPC 221 ......
-
Merck Sharp and Dohme Corporation v Wyeth LLC (No 3)
...v Bintang Ltd [1989] FCA 428; 15 IPR 686 Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis [2009] FCAFC 134; 82 IPR 416 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99; 226 FCR 324 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2015] HCA 30; 257 CLR 356 Austal Ships Pty Ltd v Stena Rederi Aktiebolag [2005] FCA 805; 66 IPR......
Request a trial to view additional results
4 firm's commentaries
-
Poisonous priority of patent claims in Australia ' The landmine laid by the Federal Court and what to do about it (Part 2 of 2)
...Ltd. v Velin-Pharma A/S [2017] APO 61 & Biogen Idec Ma Inc. [2014] APO 25. 3 Patents Act 1990 S43(3). 4 AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99 5 Nichia Corporation v Arrow Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 699 6 Simco Mining Products and Services Pty Ltd v CQMS Pty Ltd [2019......
-
Generics win the battle for CRESTOR, but lose the war over inventive step
...of those provisions. An enlarged Full Federal Court (Besanko, Jessup, Foster, Nicholas and Yates JJ) in AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99 has upheld a decision by Justice Jagot finding that two AstraZeneca patents protecting the blockbuster product CRESTOR (rosuvastatin) were ......
-
High Court upholds earlier decision that AstraZeneca's cholesterol-lowering patent is obvious
...inventive step under the Patents Act 1990 remains as stated by the Full Federal Court in this case (AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99): the inventive step must be assessed by reference to the common general knowledge of the person skilled in the art, whether alone or taken tog......
-
Cholesterol: It's All About The Numbers, Even The Patents
...patent applications or registrations has been attacked by various generic pharmaceutical companies. In AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd [2014] FCAFC 99, a five-member panel sitting in the Federal Court of Australia held that the Australian Patent No. 769897 (the equivalent of Patent 382) was......