Attorney-General (Cth) v Breckler

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1999-0617 HCA B,[1999] HCA 28
Year1999
Date1999
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
104 cases
6 books & journal articles
  • Arbitrate this! Enforcing foreign arbitral awards and chapter III of the Constitution.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 34 No. 2, August 2010
    • 1 August 2010
    ...Convention, opened for signature 10 June 1958, 330 UNTS 38 (entered into force 7 June 1959). (2) IAA s 8. (3) (1995) 183 CLR 245. (4) (1999) 197 CLR 83. (5) (2001) 203 CLR 645. (6) Peter B Rutledge, 'Arbitration and Article III' (2008) 61 Vanderbilt Law Review 1189, 1191. But see Marine Tra......
  • Re-evaluating the Collateral Challenge in the Era of Statutory Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 48-1, March 2020
    • 1 March 2020
    ...is a presumption in favour of collateral 23. Ousley (n 5) 127.24. Aronson (n 4) 242. See also Aronson, Groves and Weeks (n 18) 754.25. (1999) 197 CLR 83 (‘Breckler’).26. Ibid 108 (Gleeson CJ, Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ).27. See, eg, Gedeon v Commissioner of the New South......
  • Human Rights in the High Court of Australia, 1976-2003: The Righting of Australian Law?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-2, June 2005
    • 1 June 2005
    ...reference to scholarship on human rights in constitutional law when discussing s 117 of the Constitution); Attorney-General v Breckler (1999) 197 CLR 83 (Gleeson CJ and Gaudron, McHugh, Gummow, Hayne and Callinan JJ, citing Brandy v Human Rights And Equal Opportunity Commission and related ......
  • Thomas v. Mowbray: Australia's 'war on terror' reaches the High Court.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 32 No. 3, December 2008
    • 1 December 2008
    ...Australian Building Construction Employees and Builders' Labourers' Federation (1974) 130 CLR 87, 90 (Barwick CJ); A-G (Cth) v Breckler (1999) 197 CLR 83, 113 (Kirby (123) See, eg, Thomas (2007) 233 CLR 307, 413 (Kirby J). (124) Thomas v Mowbray [2007] HCATrans 76 (David Bennett QC, 20 Febr......
  • Get Started for Free