Attorney-General for the State of Tasmania v McDonald, Kristian Clarence
| Jurisdiction | Tasmania |
| Judge | Slicer J,Evans J,Blow J |
| Judgment Date | 23 December 2002 |
| Date | 23 December 2002 |
| Court | Supreme Court of Tasmania |
| Docket Number | CCA 72/2002 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
4 cases
-
DPP (the) v Watson, Timothy William
...v R (1989) 168 CLR 227 at 234; Griffiths v R (1977) 137 CLR 293 at 310; R v Harland-White CCA 23/1997; Attorney-General v McDonald [2002] TASSC 120; R v Dowie (supra). 25 There is, of course, no finite list of what constitutes an injustice in the case of a successful Crown appeal, but I am ......
-
HM Attorney-General v O, R L
...Attorney-General and O, R L R v Dowie [1989] Tas R 167 ; Malvaso v R (1989) 168 CLR 227; R v Harland-White CCA 23/1997; R v McDonald [2002] TASSC 120; R v Clarke [1996] 2 VR 520; R v Allpass (1993) 72 A Crim R 561; Lowndes v R (1999) 195 CLR 665, discussed. Aust Dig Criminal Law [1023] Crim......
-
Griffith, Nathan Robert v State of Tasmania [TASCCA]
...crime in those circumstances had been as long as 18 months. SeeMcDonald 21 August 2002, upheld on appeal in Attorney-General v McDonald [2002] TASSC 120. Sentences for single counts of wounding not involving a glass, bottle or stubby, had been as long as five years. The Court accepts that 1......
-
DPP v Callow, Dwayne Albert
...this appeal should be allowed.’ His Honour went on to deal with the ‘double jeopardy’ principle discussed inAttorney-General v McDonald [2002] TASSC 120. He concluded that the impact of double jeopardy factors was not such as to override the fact that the sentence imposed was so manifestly ......