Attorney-General v Oates

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date1999
Neutral Citation[1999] HCA 35,1999-0805 HCA A
Date1999
Year1999
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
23 cases
  • Aye v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Re Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs; ex parte Miah
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • May 3, 2001
    ...at 197; Oates v Williams (1998) 84 FCR 348 at 360 (reversed on appeal without reference to this issue: Attorney-General (Cth) v Oates (1999) 198 CLR 162). For discussion of different types of appeal, see Walsh v Law Society (NSW) (1999) 198 CLR 73 at 90–93 [50]–[58] per McHugh, Kirby and Ca......
  • Re Refugee Review Tribunal; ex parte Aala
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • November 16, 2000
    ...Building Construction Employees Builders Labourers' Federation (1981) 147 CLR 471 at 499–501. 121Attorney-General (Cth) v Oates (1999) 198 CLR 162 at 171–172 [16]. 122 (1999) 197 CLR 611. 123National Companies and Securities Commission v News Corporation Ltd (1984) 156 CLR 296 at 315. 124 [......
  • Plaintiff M47-2012 v Director General of Security
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • October 5, 2012
    ...at 273–274; [1996] HCA 6. See also Kruger v The Commonwealth (1997) 190 CLR 1 at 157; [1997] HCA 27; Attorney-General (Cth) v Oates (1999) 198 CLR 162 at 172 [16]; [1999] HCA 35; NAGV and NAGW of 2002 v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs (2005) 222 CLR 161 a......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Griffith University V Tang, ‘Under an Enactment’ and Limiting Access to Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 33-3, September 2005
    • September 1, 2005
    ...Tribunal v Bond (1990) 170 CLR 321 ('Bond'), 336–7 (Mason CJ). 43 Citing Mayer (1985) 157 CLR 290 and Attorney-General (Cth) v Oates (1999) 198 CLR 162, 171–2 ('Oates'). Oates concerned a provision calling for the Commonwealth Minister's consent to extend the limitation period to bring a pr......
  • Outside the Text: Inside the use of Extrinsic Materials in Statutory Interpretation
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 42-2, June 2014
    • June 1, 2014
    ...Network Ten Pty Ltd v TCN Chan nel Nine (2004) 218 CLR 273, 280 [11] (McHugh ACJ, Gummow and Hayne JJ); Attorn ey General v Oates (1999) 198 CLR 162, 175 [28] (Gleeson CJ, McHugh, Gummow, Kirby and Hayne JJ); Newcastle City Council v GIO General Ltd (1997) 191 CLR 85, 99, 112 (McHugh J). 55......