Augusta Ventures Limited v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Limited

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date10 November 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCAFC 194
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Date10 November 2020
Augusta Ventures Limited v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Limited [2020] FCAFC 194


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Augusta Ventures Limited v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Limited [2020] FCAFC 194


Appeal from:

Turner v Tesa Mining (NSW) Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1644



File numbers:


NSD 1851 of 2019NSD 1852 of 2019



Judges:

ALLSOP CJ, MIDDLETON AND WHITE JJ



Date of judgment:

10 November 2020



Catchwords:

REPRESENTATIVE PROCEEDINGS – whether the Court has power to make an order of security for costs sought against funder in industrial class action – whether the Court should exercise its discretion to make such an order


INDUSTRIAL LAW – purpose of s 570 of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) - importance of “no costs” jurisdiction brought about by s 570 to questions of power and discretion to award security for costs


COSTS – consideration of the character of a security for costs order – consideration of the consequences of non-compliance with such an order



Legislation:

Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1904 (Cth) s 197A

Conciliation and Arbitration Act 1973 (Cth) s 47

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 323, 400A, 401, 404, 539, 545, 546, 570

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 23, 33ZF, 43, 56

Industrial Relations Act 1988 (Cth) s 347

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth)

Workplace Relations Act 1996 (Cth) s 824

Workplace Relations Amendment (Work Choices) Act 2005 (Cth)



Civil Procedure Rules 1998 (UK) r 25.14

Federal Court of Australia Rules 2011 (Cth) r 19.01



Cases cited:

Abbott v Zoetis Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2019] FCA 462; 369 ALR 512

Anderson v Bowles [1951] HCA 61; 84 CLR 310

Anthony Hordern & Sons Limited v Amalgamated Clothing & Allied Trades Union of Australia (1932) 47 CLR 1

Ashby v Slipper (No 3) [2015] FCAFC 9; 317 ALR 623

Austcorp Project Number 20 Pty Ltd v LM Investment Management Ltd (in liq) [2014] FCA 1371

Australasian Meat Industry Employees’ Union v Fair Work Australia (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 103; 203 FCR 430

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; 254 FCR 68

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (The Non‑Indemnification Personal Payment Case) [2018] HCA 3; 262 CLR 157

Bailey v GlaxoSmithKline UK Limited [2017] EWHC 3195 (QB); [2018] 4 WLR 7

Ballard v Brookfield Australia Investments Ltd [2013] NSWCA 82

Bell Wholesale Co Ltd v Gates Export Corporation [1984] FCA 34; 2 FCR 1

BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster [2019] HCA 45; 374 ALR 627

Bywater v Appco Group Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 799

Campbells Cash and Carry Pty Ltd v Fostif Pty Ltd [2006] HCA 41; 229 CLR 386

Canberra Residential Developments Pty Ltd v Brendas [2009] FCA 745

Chartspike Pty Ltd v Chahoud [2001] NSWSC 585

Commissioner of Taxation v Vasiliades [2016] FCAFC 170; 344 ALR 558

Commonwealth of Australia v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2003] FCAFC 115; 129 FCR 271

Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (The Agreed Penalties Case) [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482

C. T. Bowring & Co (Insurance) Ltd v Corsi Partners Ltd [1994] 2 Lloyd’s Rep 567

Domino’s Pizza Enterprises Limited v Precision Tracking Pty Ltd (No 2) [2017] FCA 211

Dymocks Franchise System (NSW) Pty Ltd v Todd [2004] 1 WLR 2807

Fostif Pty Limited v Campbell’s Cash and Carry Pty Limited [2005] NSWCA 83; 63 NSWLR 203

GFN SA v Liquidators of Bancredit Cayman Limited (in Official Liquidation) [2009] UKPC 39

Gore v Justice Corporation Pty Ltd [2002] FCAFC 83; 119 FCR 429

Green (as liquidator of Arimco Mining Pty Limited v CGU Insurance Ltd [2008] NSWCA 148; 67 ACSR 105

James v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [1985] FCA 539; 9 FCR 442

Jeffrey & Katauskas Pty Limited v SST Consulting Pty Ltd [2009] HCA 43; 239 CLR 75

Jet Corporation of Australia Pty Ltd v Petres Pty Ltd [1983] FCA 262; 74 FLR 1

Knight v F.P. Special Assets Limited [1992] HCA 28; 174 CLR 178

Liu v Stephen Grubits and Associates [2019] FCAFC 24; 284 IR 475

Livingstone v Commissioner of Stamp Duties (Qld) (1960) 107 CLR 411

Madgwick v Kelly [2013] FCAFC 61; 212 FCR 1

Melbourne Stadiums Ltd v Sautner [2015] FCAFC 20; 229 FCR 221

Micallef v ICI Australia Operations Pty Ltd [2001] NSWCA 274

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Nystrom [2006] HCA 50; 228 CLR 566

Partington v Pacific Link Housing Ltd [2013] NSWCA 259

Perera v GetSwift Limited [2018] FCA 732; 263 FCR 1

Poulos v Waltons Stores (Interstate) Ltd [1986] FCA 430; 68 ALR 537

Premier Motorauctions Ltd (in liq) v PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP [2017] EWCA Civ 1872; [2018] 1 WLR 2955

Rajski v Computer Manufacture & Design Pty Ltd [1983] 2 NSWLR 122

Russell v The Trustees of the Roman Catholic Church for the Archdiocese of Sydney [2008] NSWCA 217, (2008) 72 NSWLR 559

Saxena v PPF Asset Management Ltd [2011] FCA 395

Thunderdome Racetiming and Scoring Pty Ltd v Dorian Industries Pty Ltd [1992] FCA 423; 36 FCR 297

Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1991] ATPR 41‑076

Wall v Royal Bank of Scotland Plc [2016] EWHC 2460 (Comm); [2017] 4 WLR 2

Westpac Banking Corporation v Lenthall [2019] FCAFC 34; 366 ALR 136

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Rossato [2020] FCAFC 84; 378 ALR 585

WorkPac Pty Ltd v Skene [2018] FCAFC 131; 264 FCR 536

Yirra Pty Ltd v Summerton [2009] FCAFC 50; 176 FCR 219

Zoetis Australia Pty Ltd v Abbott [2019] FCAFC 153



Date of hearing:

27 July 2020



Date of last submissions:

16 October 2020



Registry:



Division:



National Practice Area:



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

145



Counsel for the Applicant in NSD1851/2019 and NSD1852/2019:

Mr G Rich SC with Ms A Smith



Solicitor for the Applicant in NSD1851/2019 and NSD1852/2019:

Augusta Ventures Limited



Counsel for the First Respondent in NSD1851/2019 and NSD1852/2019:

Mr D Thomas SC with Ms E Bathurst



Solicitor for the First Respondent in NSD1851/2019 and NSD1852/2019:

King & Wood Mallesons



Counsel for the Second and Third Respondents in NSD 1852/2019:

Mr D Williams SC with Mr I Latham



Solicitor for the Second and Third Respondents in NSD 1852/2019:

Colin Biggers & Paisley

ORDERS


NSD 1851 of 2019

BETWEEN:

AUGUSTA VENTURES LIMITED

Applicant


AND:

MT ARTHUR COAL PTY LIMITED (ACN 000 181 902)

Respondent



JUDGES:

ALLSOP CJ, MIDDLETON AND WHITE JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

10 NOVEMBER 2020



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. Leave to appeal against the orders of the Court on 28 October 2019 be granted in the form of the draft notice of appeal relevantly exhibited to...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases
  • McHugh v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 23 August 2021
    ...FCAFC 134; 161 FCR 236 O’Sullivan v Farrer [1989] HCA 61; 168 CLR 210 Odhiambo v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 194; 122 FCR 29 Office of Personnel Management v Richmond 496 US 414 (1990) Plaintiff M79/2012 v Minister for Immigration [2013] HCA 24; 252 CLR 3......
  • Bradshaw v BSA Limited (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 November 2022
    ...v Swann Insurance (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 3) (2020) 385 ALR 625; [2020] FCA 1885 Augusta Ventures Limited v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Limited (2020) 283 FCR 123 Australian Education Union v State of Victoria (Department of Education and Early Childhood Development) (2015) 239 FCR 461 Australian Securit......
  • Duck v Airservices Australia (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 March 2021
    ...HCA 26; 179 ALR 406 Ashby v Slipper (No 3) [2015] FCAFC 9; 317 ALR 621 Augusta Ventures Limited v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 194; 384 ALR 340; 300 IR 446 Bannon v Nauru Phosphate Royalties Trust (No 3) [2017] VSC 214; 51 VR 362 BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster; Westpac Banking Corp v L......
  • Salama v Sydney Trains (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 6 October 2021
    ...Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) ss 361 and 570 Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 1.37 Cases cited: Augusta Ventures Ltd v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 194 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Colgate-Palmolive Pty Ltd (No 5) [2021] FCA 246 Australian workers Union v Leighton Cont......
  • Get Started for Free
1 books & journal articles
  • PUBLIC INTEREST COSTS ORDERS IN FEDERAL CLASS ACTIONS: TIME FOR A NEW APPROACH.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 2, April 2022
    • 1 April 2022
    ...a legislative provision, no costs orders could be made against unsuccessful parties: see Augusta Ventures Ltd v Mt Arthur Coal Pty Ltd (2020) 384 ALR 340, 374 [131]-[132], 375 [136]-[137] (White (241) Pearson [No 2] (n 185). (242) Ibid [1] (Murphy J). As explained by Murphy J of the Federal......