Austin, Nichols and Company Inc. v Lodestar Anstalt

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[2012] FCAFC 8,2012-0221 FCA C
Year2012
Date2012
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
14 cases
  • Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 November 2021
    ...Care IP Holdings Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 163 Apple v Registrar of Trade Marks [2014] FCA 1304 Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2012] FCAFC 8 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634 Australian Competition and Consumer Comm......
  • PDP Capital Pty Ltd v Grasshopper Ventures Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 29 July 2021
    ...275; (2006) 68 IPR 229 Aston v Harlee Manufacturing Company [1960] HCA 47; (1960) 103 CLR 391 Austin Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2012] FCAFC 8; (2012) 202 FCR 490 Australian Meat Group Pty Ltd v JBS Australia Pty Limited [2018] FCAFC 207; (2018) 268 FCR 623 Australian Woollen Mills......
  • Goodman Fielder Pte Ltd v Conga Foods Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 17 December 2020
    ...Marks [2014] FCA 1304; 227 FCR 511 Aston v Harlee Manufacturing Co [1960] HCA 47; 103 CLR 391 Austin Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2012] FCAFC 8; 202 FCR 490 Australian Meat Group Pty Ltd v JBS Australia Pty Limited [2018] FCAFC 207; 268 FCR 623 Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v F S Wal......
  • Dr August Wolff GmbH & Co. KG Arzneimittel v Combe International Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 3 February 2020
    ...103 CLR 391 Astway Pty Ltd v Council of the City of Gold Coast [2008] QCA 073; 159 LGERA 335 Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2012] FCAFC 8; 202 FCR 490 Australian Meat Group Pty Ltd v JBS Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 207; 363 ALR 113 Berlei Hestia Industries Ltd v The Bali Co......
  • Get Started for Free
2 firm's commentaries
  • Obtaining trade mark registration is not the end of the story: the risk of non-use
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 August 2012
    ...highlighted in a recent decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia in Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2012] FCAFC8. The statutory In Australia, following a period of five years from the filing date, a trade mark can be cancelled on grounds of non-use if it......
  • Best Australian and New Zealand Trade Mark Cases of 2012 - Part 1
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 27 February 2013
    ...appealed the case to the Full Federal Court, where it is due to be heard in March 2013. Austin, Nichols & Co Inc v Lodestar Anstalt [2012] FCAFC 8 Background In 2005, Austin Nichols applied to remove Lodestar's trade mark registration for WILD GEESE on the grounds of non-use over a 3 ye......