Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane (No 2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
JudgeABRAHAM J
Judgment Date17 February 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 133
Date17 February 2020
Judgment Template

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane (No 2) [2020] FCA 133


File number:

NSD 989 of 2019



Judge:

ABRAHAM J



Date of judgment:

17 February 2020



Catchwords:

ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – application for judicial review pursuant to s 5 of the Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) and relief under s 39B of the Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) regarding the issue of a search warrant under s 3E of the Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) (Crimes Act)


CRIMINAL LAW – practice and procedure – search warrant – where applicant claimed that the warrant was invalid as it did not comply with ss 3E(1), 3E(5)(a) and (c) of the Crimes Act – where the applicant claimed the conditions of the warrant did not meaningfully limit the scope of the search authorised by the warrant – interpretation of s 73A of the Defence Act 1903 (Cth)


CONSTITUTIONAL LAWimplied freedom of communication on governmental and political matters –where warrant issued pursuant to s 3E of the Crimes Actwhere warrant authorised search for certain evidential material at the premises of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation – where validity of underlying offence provisions not challenged – whether the decision to issue this warrant was ultra vires having regard to the implied freedom of political communication


EVIDENCE – whether witness qualified to express opinion – where the applicant claimed journalist privilege under s 126K of the Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) extends to seizure of material under a search warrant issued under s 3E of the Crimes Actwhere applicant claimed privilege in relation to specific documents



Legislation:

Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) ss 13(2)(a), 15AA

Administrative Decisions (Judicial Review) Act 1977 (Cth) s 5

Crimes Act 1914 (Cth) ss 3(1), 3E, 3E(1), 3E(5)(a), 3E(5)(c), 3F, 70(1), 70(2)

Criminal Code Act 1899 (Qld) s 84

Criminal Code Act 1995 (Cth) ss 131.1(1), 132.1, 132.1(1), 132.1(3)

Defence Act 1903 (Cth) Pt VII, ss 73A, 73A(1), 73A(2), 73A(1)(a), 73A(2)(a), 73F

Defence Legislation Amendment (Application of Criminal Code) Act 2001 (Cth)

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 76(1), 79(1), 126K, 126K(2), 126K(2)(b), 131A, 131A(2)

Evidence Act 2008 (Vic) ss 126K, 126K(1), 131A(2)

Evidence Amendment (Journalists’ Privilege) Act 2007 (Cth) Div 1A, ss 126A, 126B, 126C, 126D

Evidence Amendment (Journalists’ Privilege) Act 2011 (Cth) Div 1A, ss 126H, 131A

Judiciary Act 1903 (Cth) s 39B

National Security Legislation Amendment (Espionage and Foreign Interference) Act 2018 (Cth) Sch 2, Pt 1, item 7

Safety of Defences Act 1890 (Qld) s 6



Cases cited:

Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (Northern Territory) [2009] HCA 41; (2009) 239 CLR 27

Ananda Marga Pracaraka Samgha Ltd v Tomar (No 4) [2012] FCA 385; (2012) 202 FCR 564

Ashby v Commonwealth of Australia (No 2) [2012] FCA 766; (2012) 203 FCR 440

Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane [2019] FCA 1716

Australian Capital Television Pty Ltd v The Commonwealth [1992] HCA 45; (1992) 177 CLR 106

Baker v Campbell [1983] HCA 39; (1983) 153 CLR 52

Barbosa v Di Meglio [1999] NSWCA 307

Beckwith v The Queen [1976] HCA 55; (1976) 135 CLR 569

Beneficial Finance Corporation v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [1991] FCA 92; (1991) 31 FCR 523

Branzburg v Hayes et al 408 US 665 (1972)

Brown v Tasmania [2017] HCA 43; (2017) 261 CLR 328

Caratti v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police (No 2) [2016] FCA 1132

Caratti v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2017] FCAFC 177; (2017) 257 FCR 166

Clubb v Edwards; Preston v Avery [2019] HCA 11; (2019) 93 ALJR 448

Cody v J H Nelson Pty Ltd [1947] HCA 17; (1947) 74 CLR 629

Coleman v Power [2004] HCA 39; (2004) 220 CLR 1

Comcare v Banerji [2019] HCA 23; (2019) 93 ALJR 900

Dasreef Pty Ltd v Hawchar [2011] HCA 21; (2011) 243 CLR 588

Deputy Commissioner of Taxation v Clark [2003] NSWCA 91; (2003) 57 NSWLR 113

Dunesky v Elder [1994] FCA 1569; (1994) 54 FCR 540

Gas & Fuel Corporation of Victoria v Comptroller of Stamps [1964] VR 617

George v Rockett [1990] HCA 26; (1990) 170 CLR 104

Glencore International AG v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2019] HCA 26; (2019) 93 ALJR 967

Harts Australia Ltd v Commissioner, Australian Federal Police (1997) 75 FCR 145

Hart v Commissioner of Australian Federal Police [2002] FCAFC 392; (2002) 124 FCR 384

Hatfield v Health Insurance Commission [1987] FCA 286; (1987) 15 FCR 487

HG v The Queen [1999] HCA 2; (1999) 197 CLR 414

Hinchcliffe v Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police [2001] FCA 1747; (2001) 118 FCR 308

Hogan v Hinch [2011] HCA 4; (2011) 243 CLR 506

Idoport Pty Ltd & Anor v National Australia Bank Ltd & ors [2001] NSWSC 123

Independent Commission Against Corruption v Cornwall (1993) 38 NSWLR 207

Lange v Australian Broadcasting Corporation [1997] HCA 25; (1997) 189 CLR 520

Makita (Australia) Pty Ltd v Sprowles [2001] NSWCA 305; (2001) 52 NSWLR 705

McCloy v New South Wales [2015] HCA 34; (2015) 257 CLR 178

Miller v TCN Channel Nine Pty Ltd [1986] HCA 60; (1986) 161 CLR 556

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v Li [2013] HCA 18; (2013) 249 CLR 332

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Singh [2014] FCAFC 1; (2014) 231 FCR 437

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v Stretton [2016] FCAFC 11; (2016) 237 FCR 1

Minister for Immigration and Citizenship v SZMDS [2010] HCA 16; (2010) 240 CLR 611

Minister for Immigration and Border Protection v SZVFW [2018] HCA 30; (2018) 92 ALJR 713

Mulholland v Australian Electoral Commission [2004] HCA 41; (2004) 220 CLR 181

Muggeridge v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 200; (2017) 255 FCR 81

National Justice Compania Naviera SA v Prudential Assurance Co Ltd ("The Ikarian Reefer") [1993] 2 Lloyd's Rep 68

Nicholls v Director of Public Prosecutions for South Australia [1993] SASC 3964; (1993) 61 SASR 31

Notaras v Hugh [2003] NSWSC 167

John Fairfax & Sons Ltd v Cojuangco [1988] HCA 54; (1988) 165 CLR 346

Parker v Churchill [1986] FCA 88; (1986) 9 FCR 334

Peters v Attorney-General for New South Wales (1988) 16 NSWLR 24

Polley v Johnson [2015] NSWCA 256; (2015) 253 A Crim R 521

Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; (1998) 194 CLR 355

Puglisi v Australian Fisheries Management Authority [1997] FCA 846; (1997) 148 ALR 393

R v Regos [1947] HCA 19; (1947) 74 CLR 613

Re Brian Lawlor Automotive Pty Ltd and Collector of Customs (New South Wales) (1978) 1 ALD 167

R v Tillett; Ex parte Newton (1969) 14 FLR 101

Robert Bosch (Australia) Pty Ltd v Secretary, Department of Industry, Innovation, Science, Research and Tertiary Education [2012] FCAFC 117; (2012) 206 FCR 92

Roberts v Bass [2002] HCA 57; (2002) 212 CLR 1

Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCAFC 3

State of New South Wales v Corbett [2007] HCA 32; (2007) 230 CLR 606

SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; (2017) 262...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 cases
  • Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 6 April 2020
    ...Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane [2020] FCA 443 Prospective appeal from: Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane (No 2) [2020] FCA 133 File number: NSD 173 of 2020 Judge: GRIFFITHS J Date of judgment: 6 April 2020 Catchwords: COSTS – determination of costs in respect of Urgent ......
3 books & journal articles
  • Who is a Journalist? A Critical Analysis of Australian Statutory Definitions
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 50-4, December 2022
    • 1 December 2022
    ...theFreedom of Political Communication’(2020) 94(10) Australian Law Journal 777, 786–7; Australian BroadcastingCorporation v Kane (No 2) [2020] FCA 133, [264], [320]–[329].472 Federal Law Review Corporations Act does not; but it limits journalists to those who work for organisations of a spe......
  • CONSTITUTIONAL FREEDOMS AND STATUTORY EXECUTIVE POWERS.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 45 No. 3, August 2022
    • 1 August 2022
    ...Gleeson JJ); Banerji (n 1) 394-6 [19]-[20] (Kiefel CJ, Bell, Keane and Nettle JJ); Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane [No 2] (2020) 377 ALR 711, 766 [258], 781 [338] (Abraham J) ('Kane'); Palmer (n 1) 204-5 [105] (Gageler J), 222 [180] (Gordon (117) Betfair (n 116) 282 [91] (Kiefel ......
  • RISK AND UNCERTAINTY IN PUBLIC INTEREST JOURNALISM: THE IMPACT OF ESPIONAGE LAW ON PRESS FREEDOM.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 3, April 2021
    • 1 April 2021
    ...Airwaves', ABC News (Web Page, 21 October 2019) , archived at . (15) Smethurst (n 8); Australian Broadcasting Corporation v Kane [No 2] (2020) 377 ALR 711 (16) Human Rights Committee, General Comment No 34: Article 19--Freedoms of Opinion and Expression, UN Doc CCPR/C/GC/34 (12 September 20......