Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Australian Workers' Union

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Judgment Date28 July 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 861
Date28 July 2021
Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Australian Workers’ Union [2021] FCA 861


Federal Court of Australia


Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Australian Workers’ Union [2021] FCA 861

File number:

VID 334 of 2019



Judgment of:

BROMBERG J



Date of judgment:

28 July 2021



Catchwords:

INDUSTRIAL LAW – civil penalties – admitted contravention of s 475(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) which prohibits an employee organisation or an officer or member thereof requesting an employer pay employees for a period in which employees undertook unprotected industrial action – admitted contraventions of s 46 of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (Cth) which provides that a person must not organise or engage in unlawful industrial action – principles in relation to the imposition of pecuniary penalties – seriousness of contraventions – relevance of prior contraventions of industrial law – relevance of individual factors including contrition and remorse, cooperation, a culture of compliance and capacity to pay – application of the course of conduct principle



Legislation:

Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (Cth), ss 5, 6(1)(d), 46, 49(c), 81, 94(1)

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth), ss 12, 19(1)(c), 418, 474, 475, 539, 546, 793(1)(a)

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), s 21



Cases cited:

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union (The Laverton North and Cheltenham Premises Case) (No 2) [2019] FCA 973

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (2017) 254 FCR 68

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union (Perth Childrens’ Hospital Contraventions Case) [2017] FCA 491

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v The Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2006] FCA 1730; (2007) ATPR 42-140

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Menon [2020] FCA 1418

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640

Australian Opthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith (2008) 165 FCR 560

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Southcorp Ltd (No 2) (2003) 130 FCR 406

BlueScope Steel Limited v Australian Workers’ Union [2018] FCA 1574

BlueScope Steel Limited v The Australian Workers’ Union [2019] FCA 182

Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate (2015) 258 CLR 482

Construction, Forestry, Maritime, Mining and Energy Union v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner (The Palmerston Police Station Case) [2021] FCAFC 7

Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177; 384 ALR 75

Ponzio v B & P Caelli Constructions Pty Ltd (2007) 158 FCR 543

QR Ltd v Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia [2010] FCAFC 150; 204 IR 142

Registered Organisations Commissioner v Australian Workers’ Union [2019] FCA 1852

R v McInerney (1986) 42 SASR 111

Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20



Division:

Fair Work Division



Registry:

Victoria



National Practice Area:

Employment and Industrial Relations



Number of paragraphs:

81



Date of hearing:

1 March 2021



Counsel for the Applicant:

Mr J Bourke QC with Mr M Felman



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Herbert Smith Freehills



Counsel for the Respondents:

Mr C Tran



Solicitor for the Respondents:

Maurice Blackburn Lawyers




ORDERS


VID 334 of 2019

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN BUILDING AND CONSTRUCTION COMMISSIONER

Applicant


AND:

AUSTRALIAN WORKERS’ UNION

First Respondent


CRAIG KELLY

Second Respondent



order made by:

BROMBERG J

DATE OF ORDER:

28 July 2021


THE COURT DECLARES THAT:


  1. On 31 October 2018, the Second Respondent (Kelly) organised employees of OneSteel Reinforcing Pty Ltd (OneSteel), who were employed at 180 Browns Road, Noble Park, Victoria (the Site), to take industrial action that day in contravention of s 46 of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (BCIIP Act) (the 31 October 2018 s 46 Kelly Contravention).

  2. By operation of ss 94(1)(a) and 95(1)(b) of the BCIIP Act, the First Respondent (AWU) has contravened s 46 of the BCIIP Act in respect of the 31 October 2018 s 46 Kelly Contravention (the 31 October 2018 s 46 AWU Contravention).

  3. On 1 November 2018, Kelly organised employees of OneSteel to take industrial action at the Site that day in contravention of s 46 of the BCIIP Act (the 1 November 2018 s 46 Kelly Contravention).

  4. By operation of ss 94(1)(a) and 95(1)(b) of the BCIIP Act, the AWU has contravened s 46 of the BCIIP Act in respect of the 1 November 2018 s 46 Kelly Contravention (the 1 November 2018 s 46 AWU Contravention).

  5. On 31 October 2018, Kelly, at a meeting at the Site with OneSteel management, in contravention of s 475(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (FW Act), made a request that OneSteel pay its day shift employees for their shift that day in circumstances where those employees had taken industrial action for the majority of that shift (the 31 October 2018 s 475(2) Kelly Contravention).

  6. By operation of s 793(1) of the FW Act, the AWU has contravened s 475(2) of the FW Act in respect of the 31 October 2018 Kelly s 475(2) Contravention (the 31 October 2018 s 475(2) AWU Contravention).


THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The Second Respondent pay a penalty in respect of:

    1. the 31 October 2018 s 46 Kelly Contravention in the amount of $2,700;

    2. the 1 November 2018 s 46 Kelly Contravention in the amount of $2,700; and

    3. the 31 October 2018 s 475(2) Kelly Contravention in the amount of $1,600.

  2. The First Respondent pay a penalty in respect of:

    1. the 31 October 2018 s 46 AWU Contravention in the amount of $25,000;

    2. the 1 November 2018 s 46 AWU Contravention in the amount of $25,000; and

    3. the 31 October 2018 s 475(2) AWU Contravention in the amount of $30,000.

  3. The penalties referred to in Orders 1 to 2 be paid to the Commonwealth of Australia within 28 days.

  4. The First Respondent pay compensation to OneSteel Reinforcing Pty Ltd in the sum of $90,000 within 60 days of this order.

  5. There be no order as to costs.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BROMBERG J:

  1. The applicant (Commissioner) seeks civil penalties and declarations in relation to contraventions of s 46 of the Building and Construction Industry (Improving Productivity) Act 2016 (Cth) (BCIIP Act) and 475(2) of the Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) (FW Act). The first respondent (AWU) and the second respondent (Kelly) (collectively, the respondents) have admitted those...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases