Australian Capital Territory v Pinter

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Neutral Citation[2002] FCAFC 186,2002-0626 FCA A
Year2002
Date2002

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
10 cases
  • Knight v Australian Capital Territory
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 15 February 2016
    ...Representation:CounselSelf-represented (Applicant) Mr McCarthy (Respondent) Cases Cited: Australian Capital Territory v Pinter (2002) 121 FCR 509 Brouwer v Titan Corporation Ltd (1997) 73 FCR 241 Frank v Australian Capital Territory (2001) 146 ACTR 15 SZAJB v Minister for Immigration and Ci......
  • DPP v Attorney General of the Northern Territory of Australia
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court
    • 14 January 2011
    ...7 NTLR 97, applied Director of Public Prosecutions v Green (2010) 239 FLR 278, distinguished Australian Capital Territory v Pinter (2002) 121 FCR 509; Commissioner of Superannuation v Hastings (1986) 70 ALR 625; Della Patrona v Director of Public Prosecutions (Cth) No. 2 (1993) 38 NSWLR 257......
  • Julian Knight v Australian Capital Territory
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 19 December 2014
    ...G McCarthy (Respondent) Cases Cited: Abbott v Minister for Lands [1895] AC 425 Attorney-General v Chaffey (2007) 231 CLR 651 Australian Capital Territory v Pinter (2002) 121 FCR 509 Australian Capital Territory v Bullock [1995] ACTSC 63 Australian Tape Manufacturers v Commonwealth (1993) ......
  • Ronald Charles Davis v ActewAGL Distribution
    • Australia
    • Supreme Court of ACT
    • 12 December 2007
    ...for the applicant: Self litigant — Mr R C DavisCounsel for the respondent: Mr I L Male Australian Capital Territory v Pinter & Ors (2002) 121 FCR 509 Electricity Act 1971 (ACT), s 33, s 90 Electricity (amendment) Act 1994 (ACT) Utilities (consequential Provisions) Act 2000 (ACT) Utilities A......
  • Get Started for Free