Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,,Crennan,Bell,Keane JJ
Judgment Date12 December 2013
Neutral Citation[2013] HCA 54,2013-1212 HCA B
Docket NumberM98/2013
CourtHigh Court
Date12 December 2013
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
122 cases
  • Gold Titan Pty Ltd v Lopez
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 August 2021
    ...v Telstra Corporation Limited [2007] FCA 1904; (2007) 244 ALR 470 Australian Competition and Consumer Commissioner v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 BH Australia Constructions Pty Ltd v Kapeller [2019] NSWSC 1086; (2019) 100 NSWLR 367 Byers & Ors v Dorotea Pty Ltd [19......
  • Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 5 November 2021
    ...notwithstanding that there was no intention to mislead or deceive: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; 250 CLR 640 at [39]. In Vendor Advocacy Australia Pty Ltd v Seitanidis [2013] FCA 971; 103 IPR 1, Middleton J stated at [258]: It is import......
  • Xiamen Huadian Switchgear Co Ltd v Powins Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 September 2022
    ...Pty Ltd (2020) 278 FCR 450; [2020] FCAFC 130 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640; [2013] HCA 54 Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v FS Walton & Co Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 641 Birmingham Vinegar Brewing Co Ltd v Powell [1897] AC 710 BLH Engineering &......
  • Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 16 October 2020
    ...Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; 262 FCR 243 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
8 firm's commentaries
  • Advertising and the ACL: Fine print couldn't save TPG Internet in the High Court
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 25 December 2013
    ...on TPG Internet Pty Ltd for a misleading advertising campaign about its Unlimited ADSL2+ broadband bundle (ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54). The key messages for advertisers from the High Court's decision are the "dominant message" test is central to any assessment of whether adve......
  • Dominant message of advertising should be the courts’ focus for consumer protection
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 13 February 2014
    ...recent majority decision of the High Court in ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 confirms that courts should focus on the "dominant message" in determining whether an advertisement is misleading or deceptive and that the conduct need not actually mislead or cause loss to consumers in......
  • ACCC to pursue companies that breach consumer laws
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 10 February 2014
    ...in the High Court has cemented its resolve to target large companies that breach consumer protection laws. In ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (the TPG Case), the High Court upheld a $2 million fine against TPG in relation to the advertisements for its 'Unlimited ADSL2+' service. T......
  • 你的行为或者发布的广告是否构成欺骗或者误导?ACL Mandarin Guide: Is your conduct or advertising misleading or deceptive?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 15 October 2019
    ...in serious consequences. Case Studies 案例 1 :澳大利亚竞争与消费者委员会控告TPG一案 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 案情内容 Facts: TPG在多个多媒体平台上发布ADSL2+服务的广告。广告中突出而明显的讯息是ADSL2+服务每个月费用为 TPG engaged in a multimedia advertising campaign for...
  • Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
  • Consumer Redress Legislation: Simplifying or Subverting the Law of Contract
    • United Kingdom
    • The Modern Law Review No. 80-5, September 2017
    • 1 September 2017
    ...(Privy Council); see also Antonio vAntonio [2010] EWHC 1199 (QB).61 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission vTPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (2013)88 ALJR 176 at [55] per French CJ, Crennan, Bell and Keane JJ. For a good, recent illustration,see Redmond Family Holdings vGC Access ......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT