Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd
Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
Judge | French CJ,,Crennan,Bell,Keane JJ |
Judgment Date | 12 December 2013 |
Neutral Citation | [2013] HCA 54,2013-1212 HCA B |
Docket Number | M98/2013 |
Court | High Court |
Date | 12 December 2013 |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
122 cases
-
Gold Titan Pty Ltd v Lopez
...v Telstra Corporation Limited [2007] FCA 1904; (2007) 244 ALR 470 Australian Competition and Consumer Commissioner v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 BH Australia Constructions Pty Ltd v Kapeller [2019] NSWSC 1086; (2019) 100 NSWLR 367 Byers & Ors v Dorotea Pty Ltd [19......
-
Henley Arch Pty Ltd v Henley Constructions Pty Ltd
...notwithstanding that there was no intention to mislead or deceive: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; 250 CLR 640 at [39]. In Vendor Advocacy Australia Pty Ltd v Seitanidis [2013] FCA 971; 103 IPR 1, Middleton J stated at [258]: It is import......
-
Xiamen Huadian Switchgear Co Ltd v Powins Pty Ltd
...Pty Ltd (2020) 278 FCR 450; [2020] FCAFC 130 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2013) 250 CLR 640; [2013] HCA 54 Australian Woollen Mills Ltd v FS Walton & Co Ltd (1937) 58 CLR 641 Birmingham Vinegar Brewing Co Ltd v Powell [1897] AC 710 BLH Engineering &......
-
Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner
...Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; 262 FCR 243 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies......
Request a trial to view additional results
8 firm's commentaries
-
Advertising and the ACL: Fine print couldn't save TPG Internet in the High Court
...on TPG Internet Pty Ltd for a misleading advertising campaign about its Unlimited ADSL2+ broadband bundle (ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54). The key messages for advertisers from the High Court's decision are the "dominant message" test is central to any assessment of whether adve......
-
Dominant message of advertising should be the courts focus for consumer protection
...recent majority decision of the High Court in ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 confirms that courts should focus on the "dominant message" in determining whether an advertisement is misleading or deceptive and that the conduct need not actually mislead or cause loss to consumers in......
-
ACCC to pursue companies that breach consumer laws
...in the High Court has cemented its resolve to target large companies that breach consumer protection laws. In ACCC v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (the TPG Case), the High Court upheld a $2 million fine against TPG in relation to the advertisements for its 'Unlimited ADSL2+' service. T......
-
你的行为或者发布的广告是否构成欺骗或者误导?ACL Mandarin Guide: Is your conduct or advertising misleading or deceptive?
...in serious consequences. Case Studies 案例 1 :澳大利亚竞争与消费者委员会控告TPG一案 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 案情内容 Facts: TPG在多个多媒体平台上发布ADSL2+服务的广告。广告中突出而明显的讯息是ADSL2+服务每个月费用为 TPG engaged in a multimedia advertising campaign for...
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
Consumer Redress Legislation: Simplifying or Subverting the Law of Contract
...(Privy Council); see also Antonio vAntonio [2010] EWHC 1199 (QB).61 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission vTPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54 (2013)88 ALJR 176 at [55] per French CJ, Crennan, Bell and Keane JJ. For a good, recent illustration,see Redmond Family Holdings vGC Access ......