Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judge | PERRAM J |
| Judgment Date | 30 May 2019 |
| Neutral Citation | [2019] FCA 786 |
| Date | 30 May 2019 |
| Court | Federal Court |
FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies) [2019] FCA 786
|
File number: |
NSD 955 of 2009 |
|
|
|
|
Judge: |
PERRAM J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
30 May 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
COMPETITION – collusive arrangement – exclusive dealing – respondent found to have contravened s 45 of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – enforcement and remedies – application for declarations, injunctions and pecuniary penalties – consideration of relevant principles
PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW – act of state doctrine – distinction between foreign state immunity and act of state doctrine – whether commercial acts of respondent airline had sovereign aspect to them
PUBLIC INTERNATIONAL LAW – where respondent submitted injunctions and pecuniary penalties would be contrary to customary international law – where respondent argued customary international law relevant to Court’s discretion and power to grant remedies – where respondent argued relevance of principles of ‘accommodation, mutuality and proportionality’
STATUTORY INTERPRETATION – factors relevant to imposition of pecuniary penalty – loss or damage flowing from contravention of competition law – consideration of deeming provision in s 45A of the Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) – whether s 45A can inform assessment of loss or damage under s 76 or limited to establishing breach of s 45 – consideration of Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Comber [1986] FCA 92; 10 FCR 88 and Re Levy; Ex parte Walton (1881) 17 Ch D 746 |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 8 Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 76, 80 Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) s 55 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21 Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) ss 4E, 5, 45, 45A, 45DA Agreement between the Government of Australia and the Government of the Republic of Indonesia (7 February 2013) 2016 ATS 25 (entered into force 30 December 2016) |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand [2014] FCA 1157 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Air New Zealand (No 15) [2018] FCA 1166 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v British Airways PLC [2008] FCA 1977 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cargolux Airlines International SA [2009] FCA 342 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cathay Pacific Airways Ltd [2012] FCA 1392 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2015] FCA 330; 327 ALR 540 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2007] FCA 1730; ATPR 42-140 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd (in liquidation) [2007] FCAFC 146; 161 FCR 513 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Emirates [2012] FCA 1108 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Gullyside Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 1727; (2006) ATPR 42-097 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum (No 2) [2005] FCA 254; 215 ALR 281 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v J McPhee & Son (Aust) Pty Ltd (No 5) [1998] FCA 310; ATPR 41-628 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij NV (KLM) [2009] FCA 341 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Korean Air Lines Co Ltd [2011] FCA 1360 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Liquorland (Australia) Pty Ltd [2005] FCA 683; ATPR 42-070 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Malaysia Airline System Berhad (No 2) [2012] FCA 767 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Martinair Holland NV [2009] FCA 340 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v McMahon Services Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 1425; ATPR 42-031 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Midland Brick Co Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 693; 207 ALR 329 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Qantas Airways Limited [2008] FCA 1976; 253 ALR 89 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Singapore Airlines Cargo Pte Ltd [2012] FCA 1395 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Société Air France [2009] FCA 341 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2010] FCA 790; 188 FCR 238 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Thai Airways [2012] FCA 1434 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; 357 ALR 55 Australian Competition and Consumer Commissioner v Japan Airlines International Co Ltd [2011] FCA 365 BMW Australia Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2004] FCAFC 167; 207 ALR 452 Commonwealth v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; 258 CLR 482 Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; 194 IR 461 Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Comber [1986] FCA 92; 10 FCR 88 Firebird Global Master Fund II Ltd v Republic of Nauru [2015] HCA 43; 258 CLR 31 Flight Centre Ltd v Australian Competition Commission (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 53; 356 ALR 389 Hunter Douglas Australia Pty Ltd v Perma Blinds (1968) 122 CLR 49 International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers v Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries 649 F2d 1354 (9th Cir 1981) Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; 228 CLR 357 Mill v The Queen (1988) 166 CLR 59 Mornington Inn Pty Ltd v Jordan [2008] FCAFC 70; 168 FCR 383 Muller v Dalgety & Co Ltd [1909] HCA 67; 9 CLR 693 NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134; 71 FCR 285 PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2011] FCAFC 52; 192 FCR 393 PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] HCA 33; 247 CLR 240 R v Kilic [2016] HCA 48; 259 CLR 256 Re Levy; Ex parte Walton (1881) 17 Ch D 746 Re Queensland Co-operative Milling Association Ltd (1976) 8 ALR 481 Rural Press v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75; 216 CLR 53 Singtel Optus v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; 287 ALR 249 Spectrum Stores Inc v Citgo Petroleum 632 F3d 935 (5th Cir 2011) Tax Practitioners Board v Su [2014] FCA 731 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762; (1991) ATPR 41-076 Visy Paper Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 59; 216 CLR 1 |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
22 and 25 June 2018 |
|
|
|
|
Date of last submissions: |
16 May 2019 (Applicant) 23 May 2019 (Respondent) |
|
|
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
...Pty Ltd (2004) ATPR 42-031; [2004] FCA 1425 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (2019) 370 ALR 637; [2019] FCA 786 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Qantas Airways Ltd (2008) 253 ALR 89; [2008] FCA 1976 Australian Competition and Consumer ......
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Penalty Hearing)
...Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; (2022) 96 ALJR 426 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd [2019] FCA 786; (2019) 370 ALR 637 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; (2016) 340 ALR 25 A......
-
Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre v Crown Melbourne Limited
...v MSY Technology Pty Ltd [2011] FCA 382; (2011) 279 ALR 609 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd [2019] FCA 786; (2019) 370 ALR 637 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; (2016) 340 ALR 25 ......
-
PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission
...and Consumer Commission [2020] FCA 685 Appeal from: Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd (Remedies) [2019] FCA 786 File number: NSD 1011 of 2019 Judge: YATES J Date of judgment: 21 May 2020 Catchwords: PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE – application for stay of appe......
-
State Actors, Sovereignty And Securing Enforcement In Australia, Hong Kong And Singapore
...immunity, it may be able to establish that its property should be immune from the execution of court judgments. Article 54ACCC v PT Garuda Indonesia [2019] FCA 786. It held that Garuda Indonesia Airlines, which was 95% owned by Indonesia and had members of the Indonesian Government as four ......