Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
JudgeBROMWICH J
Judgment Date26 November 2019
Neutral Citation[2019] FCA 1982
Date26 November 2019


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2019] FCA 1982


File number:

NSD 453 of 2016



Judge:

BROMWICH J



Date of judgment:

26 November 2019



Catchwords:

CONSUMER LAW – alleged contraventions of s 21 of the Australian Consumer Law – where respondent provided online vocational education training courses – whether respondent engaged in unconscionable system of conduct or pattern of behaviour by visiting low socio-economic communities, making false or misleading representations courses were free, offering inducements, failing to explain nature of VET FEE-HELP obligations, not assessing adequacy of skills to complete course – whether insufficient training and monitoring of agents – whether unconscionable conduct in relation to 13 individual consumers


CONSUMER LAW – alleged contraventions of ss 76 and 78 of the Australian Consumer Law – whether respondent contravened unsolicited consumer agreement provisions regarding specific consumers


CONSUMER LAW – alleged contraventions of ss 18 and 29 of the Australian Consumer Law – misleading or deceptive conduct in trade or commerce – false or misleading representations about goods or services –whether recruiters made misleading or deceptive representations to specific consumers – whether this was shown to be part of a wider system of conduct or pattern of behaviour



Legislation:

Australian Consumer Law (contained in Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth)) ss 18, 21, 21(4)(b), 22, 29(1), 69, 70, 76, 78, 239

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), ss 137H(3), 139B(1)(a), 130B(2), 155

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) s 500

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 136, 140(2)

Higher Education Support Act 2003 (Cth)

National Vocational Education and Training Regulator Act 2011 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Hall [2018] FCAFC 83; 277 IR 75

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ABG Pages Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 764

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ACN 117 372 915 Pty Ltd (formerly Advanced Medical Institute Pty Ltd) (in liq) [2015] FCA 368; ATPR 42-498

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) [2017] FCA 521

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2018] FCA 1459

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cornerstone Investment Aust Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 4) [2018] FCA 1408

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 2) [2017] FCA 709

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Harrison [2016] FCA 1543

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt [2019] HCA 18; 368 ALR 1

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Medibank Private Ltd [2018] FCAFC 235

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Unique International College [2017] FCA 727

Australian Securities Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2019] FCA 1284

Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336

Evans v Braddock [2015] NSWSC 249

NRM Corporation Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2016] FCAFC 98, ATPR 42-531

Paciocco v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd [2015] FCAFC 50; 236 FCR 199

Paciocco v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2016] HCA 28; 258 CLR 525

Parker v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2019] FCAFC 56; 365 ALR 402

Shepherd v The Queen [1990] HCA 56; 170 CLR 573

Tonto Home Loans Australia Pty Ltd v Tavares [2011] NSWCA 389; 15 BPR 29,699

Unique International College Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2018] FCAFC 155; 362 ALR 66

Watson v Foxman (1995) 49 NSWLR 315



Dates of hearing:

17-21 September 2018



Date of last submissions:

9 November 2018



Registry:

New South Wales



Division:

General



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-Area:

Regulator and Consumer Protection



Category:

Catchwords



Number of paragraphs:

774



Counsel for the Applicants:

Mr G Kennett SC with Mr D Tynan



Solicitor for the Applicants:

Corrs Chambers Westgarth



Counsel for the Respondent:

Ms K Morgan SC with Ms C Hamilton-Jewell



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Minter Ellison

ORDERS


NSD 453 of 2016

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION

First Applicant


COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA

Second Applicant


AND:

AUSTRALIAN INSTITUTE OF PROFESSIONAL EDUCATION PTY LTD (IN LIQ) (ACN 126 628 215)

Respondent


JUDGE:

BROMWICH J

DATE OF ORDER:

26 November 2019



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. The parties furnish, by email to the associate to Justice Bromwich, agreed or competing orders arising from the reasons for judgment within 14 days, or such further time as may be allowed.

2. A case management hearing be listed on a date to be fixed.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.




REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

BROMWICH J:


INTRODUCTION

[1]

THE PLEADED POSITION AND CASE FOR THE PARTIES

[15]

Overview of the applicants’ case and AIPE’s response

[15]

Admissions as to background facts

[24]

Core disputed allegations

[34]

Divergent views on what needs to be established and how

[41]

THE VET FEE-HELP SCHEME

[65]

Essential Features

[65]

The VET FEE-HELP scheme and its potential for abuse

[72]

AIPE’S OPERATIONS

[94]

Overview of AIPE’s business

[94]

AIPE’s enrolment process and forms

[105]

Enrolment data relied upon by the applicants

[128]

LEGAL PRINCIPLES

[146]

Unconscionable conduct

[147]

Differences between this case and Unique

[159]

Use of individual consumer witnesses

[173]

False, misleading or deceptive conduct

[176]

Unsolicited consumer agreements

[178]

INDIVIDUAL CONSUMER WITNESSES

[182]

Consumer MI

[186]

Consumer RS

[193]

Consumer TK (supported by CF)

[209]

Consumer CRS

[243]

Consumer MS

[270]

Consumer LT

[307]

Consumer FM

[324]

Consumer KB

[335]

Consumer KP

[353]

Consumer JC

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
8 cases