Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Smart Corporation Pty Ltd (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court (Australia)
Judgment Date15 April 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 347
Date15 April 2021


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Smart Corporation Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 347

File number:

WAD 215 of 2019



Judgment of:

JACKSON J



Date of judgment:

15 April 2021



Catchwords:

CONSUMER LAW - application for remedies under the Australian Consumer Law - respondent company in business of hiring out four wheel drive vehicles - knowing involvement of second and third respondents


CONSUMER LAW - misleading or deceptive conduct - false or misleading representations - website and certain emails represented that vehicles were fully insured - vehicles not fully insured - contract term giving discretion to first respondent not to make claim against insurer even if vehicle insured and instead claim damage from hirer - finding that respondents had engaged in misleading or deceptive conduct


CONSUMER LAW - unfair contract terms - contract term permitted first respondent to track hire vehicles by global positioning system (GPS) - GPS data used to create reports alleging that hirers had engaged in driving behaviour which caused 'excessive wear and tear' - contract term allowing first respondent to deduct $500 from hirers' bonds per incident - contract term giving discretion to first respondent not to make claim against insurer even if vehicle insured and instead claim damage from hirer - contract term providing that hirers must not denigrate first respondent in any way after hire period had expired - terms found to be unfair


CONSUMER LAW - unconscionable conduct - bonds retained after hire - aggressive emails advising customers of bond retention - emails threatened customers with litigation, referral to authorities on basis of GPS data - emails intended to intimidate customers into not challenging the retention of the bonds - conduct found to be unconscionable



CONSUMER LAW - remedies - declarations including that contract terms are unfair - penalties - unknowable number of contraventions - course of conduct - non-party consumer redress orders



Legislation:

Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AB

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) Part 2, Division 2

Bankruptcy Act 1966 (Cth) ss 58, 82

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) ss 83, 155, 137H Schedule 2 (Australian Consumer Law) ss 2, 15, 16, 18, 21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 84, 87, 224, 232, 237, 238, 239, 243, 248, 250

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21



Cases cited:

AB v Western Australia [2011] HCA 42; (2011) 244 CLR 390

Aqua-Marine Marketing Pty Ltd v Pacific Reef Fisheries (Australia) Pty Ltd (No 5) [2012] FCA 908

Attorney‑General of New South Wales v World Best Holdings Ltd [2005] NSWCA 261; (2005) 63 NSWLR 557

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2017] FCAFC 113; (2017) 254 FCR 68

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v ACN 117 372 915 Pty Ltd (in liq) (formerly Advanced Medical Institute Pty Limited) [2015] FCA 368

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Ashley & Martin Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1436

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Black on White Pty Ltd [2004] FCA 363; (2004) 138 FCR 314

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Chrisco Hampers Australia Limited [2015] FCA 1204; (2015) 239 FCR 33

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v CLA Trading Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 377

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Clinica Internationale Pty Ltd (No 2) [2016] FCA 62

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 634; (2014) 317 ALR 73

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cornerstone Investment Aust Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 5) [2019] FCA 1544

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dataline.Net.Au Pty Ltd [2007] FCAFC 146; (2007) 161 FCR 513

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dukemaster Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 682

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Excite Mobile Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1267

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Geowash Pty Ltd (Subject to a Deed of Company Arrangement) (No 4) [2020] FCA 23; (2020) 376 ALR 701

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Get Qualified Australia Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2017] FCA 1018

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Hillside (Australia New Media) Pty Ltd trading as Bet365 (No 2) [2016] FCA 698

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Lux Distributors Pty Ltd [2013] FCAFC 90

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Morild Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1308

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Quantum Housing Group Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 40

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; (2016) 340 ALR 25

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Renegade Gas Pty Ltd (trading as Supagas NSW) [2014] FCA 1135

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Service Seeking Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1040

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Smart Corporation Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 1603

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Sony Interactive Entertainment Network Europe Limited [2020] FCA 787; (2020) 381 ALR 531

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 130; (2020) 381 ALR 507

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler [2002] NSWSC 483; (2002) 42 ACSR 80

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 292; (2010) 268 ALR 303

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Kobelt [2019] HCA 18; (2019) 267 CLR 1

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Exchange Pty Ltd [2005] FCAFC 226; (2005) 148 FCR 132

Commonwealth Bank of Australia v Finance Sector Union of Australia [2002] FCAFC 193; (2002) 125 FCR 9

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; (2010) 269 ALR 1

Director General of Fair Trading v First National Bank plc [2002] UKHL 52; [2002] 1 AC 481

Elan, Re Guild Enterprises Australia Pty Ltd v Cohen [2020] FCA 79; (2020) 142 ACSR 554

Flight Centre Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 53; (2018) 260 FCR 68

Foots v Southern Cross Mine Management Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 56; (2007) 234 CLR 52

Gaffney v Federal Commissioner of Taxation (1998) 81 FCR 574

IMF (Australia) Ltd v Sons Of Gwalia Ltd (Administrator...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bank of Queensland Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 12 August 2021
    ...Commission v JJ Richards & Sons Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 1224 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Smart Corporation Pty Ltd (No 3) [2021] FCA 347 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Bendigo and Adelaide Bank Limited [2020] FCA 716 Clarence City Council v Commonwealth o......
  • Lobux Pty Ltd v Willshaun Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 11 March 2022
    ...Pty Ltd (2021) 150 ACSR 165; [2021] FCA 153 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Smart Corporation Pty Ltd (No 3) (2021) 153 ACSR 347; [2021] FCA 347 Barnes v Forty Two International Pty Ltd (2014) 316 ALR 408; [2014] FCAFC 152 Kuhl v Zurich Financial Services Australia Ltd (201......
1 firm's commentaries
  • A recap of ACCC recent consumer law enforcement actions
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 27 June 2022
    ...in both the areas of Competition and Consumer law. In part one we focus on Consumer law. ACCC v Smart Corporation Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) [2021] FCA 347 Smart Corporation Pty Ltd, previously trading as 'Australian 4WD Hire' (Australian 4WD Hire), operated as the name suggests a 4WD hire bus......
1 books & journal articles
  • Regulating the Fairness of Work Contracts in the Gig Economy
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 51-4, December 2023
    • 1 December 2023
    ...see, logically,how the transparency of a term can be relevant to the matters set out in s 24(1): see ACCC vSmart Corp Pty Ltd (No 3) (2021) 153 ACSR 347, [71]; Peter Sise, ‘The Unfair Contract Term Provisions: What’sTransparency Got to Do with It?’(2017) 17(1) QUT Law Review 160. Neverthele......