Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
Judgment Date08 February 2023
Neutral Citation[2023] FCAFC 5
Date08 February 2023
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 5


Federal Court of Australia


Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 5

Appeal from:

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1488

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd (No 3) [2022] FCA 3



File number(s):

NSD 20 of 2022



Judgment of:

RARES, STEWART AND ABRAHAM JJ



Date of judgment:

8 February 2023



Catchwords:

CONSUMER LAW – appeal by regulator against civil penalty imposed by primary judge for manifest inadequacy – where penalty discretion miscarried and may be re-exercised by appellate court – where errors in findings of primary judge – where cases with comparative penalties relevant but not highly useful


COSTS – whether costs discretion miscarried – where primary judge ordered mostly successful party to pay half of unsuccessful party’s costs – where primary judge misapplied principle that successful party generally entitled to costs unless their conduct warrants otherwise – where exercise of discretion miscarried – where penalty hearing necessary – where regulator obtained imposition of penalty – where otherwise successful party unsuccessful on application for injunctive relief – where mostly successful party entitled to its costs subject to discount for failed application



Legislation:

Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth) s 137H; Sch 2 ss 29, 34, 48 and 224

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 43



Cases cited:

AB v The Queen [1999] HCA 46; (1999) 198 CLR 111

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union [2018] HCA 3; (2018) 262 CLR 157

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; (2022) 399 ALR 599

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cabcharge [2010] FCA 1261

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Limited [2015] FCA 330; (2015) 327 ALR 540

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 1488

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd (No 3) [2022] FCA 3

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd [2021] FCAFC 142; (2021) 392 ALR 205

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCAFC 157

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1409

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Jetstar Airways Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 797; (2019) 136 ACSR 603

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd (No 2) [2021] FCA 102

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Leahy Petroleum Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 1844; (2007) ATPR 42-200

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Oticon Australia Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1826

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; (2016) 340 ALR 25

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 875

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Ltd [2010] FCA 790; 188 FCR 238

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Viagogo AG (No 3) [2020] FCA 1423

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki Corporation [2018] FCAFC 73; (2018) 262 FCR 243

Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482

Competition and Consumer Commission v Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd [1997] FCA 450; (1997) 145 ALR 36

Construction, Forestry, Mining and Energy Union v Cahill [2010] FCAFC 39; (2010) 269 ALR 1

Flight Centre Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (No 2) [2018] FCAFC 53; (2018) 260 FCR 68

Foots v Southern Cross Mine Management Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 56; (2007) 234 CLR 52

Gray v Richards (No 2) [2014] HCA 47; (2014) 89 ALJR 113

Hili v The Queen; Jones v The Queen [2010] HCA 45; (2010) 242 CLR 520

House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499

Latoudis v Casey [1990] HCA 59; (1990) 170 CLR 534

Lowndes v The Queen [1999] HCA 29; (1999) 195 CLR 665

Markarian v The Queen [2005] HCA 25; (1999) 228 CLR 357

Mill v The Queen [1988] HCA 70; (1988) 166 CLR 59

Northern Territory of Australia v Sangare [2019] HCA 25; (2019) 265 CLR 164

NW Frozen Foods Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [1996] FCA 1134; (1996) 71 FCR 285

Oshlack v Richmond River Council [1998] HCA 11; (1998) 193 CLR 72

Parkdale Custom Built Furniture Pty Ltd v Puxu Pty Ltd [1982] HCA 44; (1982) 149 CLR 191

Ruddock v Vadarlis (No 2) [2001] FCA 1865; (2001) 115 FCR 229

The Queen v Pham [2015] HCA 39; (2015) 256 CLR 550

TPG Internet Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 190; (2012) 210 FCR 277

Viagogo AG v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2022] FCAFC 87

Victoria v Sportsbet Pty Ltd (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 174

Volkswagen Aktiengesellschaft v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2021] FCAFC 49; (2021) 284 FCR 24

Wong v The Queen [2001] HCA 64; (2001) 207 CLR 584



Division:

General Division



Registry:

New South Wales



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Regulator and Consumer Protection



Number of paragraphs:

119



Date of hearing:

11 August 2022



Counsel for the Appellant:

Mr N Owens SC and Ms D Forrester



Solicitor for the Appellant:

Corrs Chambers Westgarth



Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr A Bannon SC and Mr C E Bannan



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Clayton Utz




ORDERS


NSD 20 of 2022

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN COMPETITION AND CONSUMER COMMISSION

Appellant


AND:

EMPLOYSURE LTD ACN 145 676 026

Respondent



order made by:

RARES, STEWART AND ABRAHAM JJ

DATE OF ORDER:

8 February 2023



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

  1. The appeal be allowed.

  2. Order 1 made by the primary judge in NSD 2384 of 2018 on 29 November 2021 be set aside and in lieu thereof it be ordered that the Respondent pay to the Commonwealth of Australia within 30 days a pecuniary penalty of $3 million pursuant to s 224 of the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), contained in Sch 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth), in respect of the contraventions of the ACL identified in Order 1 made by the Full Court on 27 August 2021.

  3. Order...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 cases
  • Australian Communications and Media Authority v Jones (No 4)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 July 2023
    ...v Jones (No 3) [2023] FCA 511 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Employsure Pty Ltd (ACN 145 676 026) (2023) 407 ALR 302; [2023] FCAFC 5 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v High Adventure Pty Ltd (2006) ATPR ¶42-091; [2005] FCAFC 247 Australian Competition and Con......
1 firm's commentaries
  • ACCC recent consumer law enforcement actions
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 4 May 2023
    ...It was also ordered to publish corrective advertising and to establish a consumer law compliance program. ACCC v Employsure Pty Ltd [2023] FCAFC 5 Employsure is a private company that offers employment relations and workplace health and safety advisory services to business owners. In 2021 t......