Australian Safewaystores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1987-0310 HCA B,[1987] HCA 7
Year1987
Date1987
CourtHigh Court

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
133 cases
  • Imbree v McNeilly; McNeilly v Imbree
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 28 August 2008
    ...204 CLR 333; [2000] 204 CLR; New South Wales v Lepore (2003) 212 CLR 511; [2003] 212 CLR. 50Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479; [1987] 162 52Sutherland Shire Council v Heyman (1985) 157 CLR 424. 53Jaensch v Coffey (1984) 155 CLR 549 at 584 per Deane J; [1984] HCA......
  • Jones v Bartlett
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 16 November 2000
    ...use of the premises’ or ‘unusual dangers’ would reintroduce into the law the categories expelled by this Court in Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna54. Reasonable care in all the circumstances of the case is the benchmark of negligence law. No exception to it should or need be made......
  • Neindorf v Junkovic
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 8 December 2005
    ...not until the 1980s that the common law of Australia abandoned the approach described by Professor Fleming. In 1987, in Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna2, this Court approved what, in 1984, had been said by Deane J in Hackshaw v Shaw3: ‘… it is not necessary, in an action in negl......
  • Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 7 December 2000
    ...at [54]. 188 eg Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 CLR 7; Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479; Burnie Port Authority v General Jones Pty Ltd (1994) 179 CLR 520; Bryan v Maloney (1995) 182 CLR 189 eg Perre v Apand Pty Ltd (1999) 198 C......
  • Get Started for Free
7 firm's commentaries
7 books & journal articles
  • Government liability in negligence.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 32 No. 1, April 2008
    • 1 April 2008
    ...81-376; BT v Oei [1999] NSWSC 1082 (Unreported, Bell J, 5 November 1999). (175) See, eg, Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLR 479. Cf Modbury Triangle Shopping Centre Pry Ltd v Anzil (2000) 205 CLR 254. (176) See, eg, Howard v Jarvis (1958) 98 CLR 177; Dixon v Western ......
  • THE PROMISE OF UNIVERSALITY
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...13 at [25]. 147 [2012] EWCA Civ 239 at [44] and [71]–[73]. 148 [2013] 3 SLR 284 at [44], [62]–[65], [98], [100], [130] and [144]. 149 (1987) 162 CLR 479. 150 For an excellent exegesis of the authorities in respect of the imposition of a non-delegable duty of care, see Woodland v The Swimmin......
  • The site
    • United Kingdom
    • Construction Law. Volume II - Third Edition
    • 13 April 2020
    ...this chapter): see Papatonakis v Australian Telecommunications Commission (1985) 156 CLr 7; Australian Safeway Stores Pty Ltd v Zaluzna (1987) 162 CLr 479; Ratclif v McConnell [1999] 1 WLr 670 (Ca); Vairy v Wyong Shire Council (2005) 223 CLr 422 at 432 [25], per Mchugh J (dissenting); Leich......
  • Case Note OCCUPIER'S LIABILITY AND NEGLIGENCE
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2013, December 2013
    • 1 December 2013
    ...remains unclear. 31 British Railway Board v Herrington [1972] AC 877. 32 c 3. 33 Occupier's Liability Act (1984) (c 3) (UK) s1(3). 34 (1987) 162 CLR 479. 35 It should be noted that the High Court of Australia had long been championing the idea that ordinary principles of negligence should a......
  • Get Started for Free