Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court (Australia)
JudgeFrench CJ,Gummow,Hayne,Crennan,Kiefel,Bell JJ
Judgment Date03 May 2012
Neutral Citation[2012] HCA 17,2012-0503 HCA B
Docket NumberMatter No S174/2011 Matter No S178/2011 Matter No S179/2011 Matter No S175/2011 Matter No S180/2011 Matter No S181/2011 Matter No S174/2011
Date03 May 2012

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
147 cases
  • Transport Workers' Union of Australia v Qantas Airways Limited
    • Australia
    • Federal Court (Australia)
    • 30 d5 Julho d5 2021
    ...v Queensland Nurses’ Union of Employees [2019] FCAFC 215; (2019) 273 FCR 332 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; (2012) 247 CLR 345 Australian Workers’ Union v John Holland [2001] FCA 93; (2001) 103 IR 205 Axon v Axon (1937) 59 CLR 395 Ballard v Multip......
  • The Environment Centre NT Inc v Minister for Resources and Water (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court (Australia)
    • 23 d4 Dezembro d4 2021
    ...Heritage Commission v Mount Isa Mines Ltd [1997] HCA 10; 187 CLR 297 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17; 247 CLR 345 Barristers’ Board (WA) v Tranter Corporation Pty Ltd [1976] WAR 65 Bechara v Bates [2021] FCAFC 34; 338 ALR 414 Caporale v Deputy Commi......
  • Get Started for Free
11 firm's commentaries
  • The government model litigant policy - ethical issues
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 27 d1 Julho d1 2015
    ...Appeals Tribunal (2012) 203 FCR 166; 128 ALD 489; [2012] FCAFC 90; BC201204504 at [42]. 4ASIC v Hellicar (2012) 247 CLR 345; 286 ALR 501; [2012] HCA 17; BC201202609 at [239] per Heydon J; LVR (WA) Pty Ltd v Administrative Appeals Tribunal (2012) 203 FCR 166; 128 ALD 489; [2012] FCAFC 90; BC......
  • Tesco - Food for thought for directors of Australian companies
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 8 d3 Outubro d3 2014
    ...of judicial consideration in recent years, most notably in Centro (ASIC v Healey & Ors [2011] FCA 717), James Hardie (ASIC v Hellicar [2012] HCA 17) and Fortescue Metals (ASIC v Fortescue Metals Group Ltd [2011] FCAFC Centro would be of particular relevance to a "Tesco-style" overstatem......
  • James Hardie - The final instalment - NSW Court of Appeal disqualifies and penalises company officers
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 18 d0 Novembro d0 2012
    ...Ors v Australian Securities & Investments Commission [2012] NSWCA 370 4 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hellicar (2012) 286 ALR 501; [2012] HCA 17 5 Shafron v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2012) 286 ALR 612; [2012] HCA 18 The content of this articl......
  • Implications for General Counsel - the James Hardie Appeals
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 20 d3 Junho d3 2012
    ...ensure the ASX release, and the minute books, were not false or misleading – both a breach of duty. Footnote 1 ASIC v Hellicar & Ors [2012] HCA 17; Shafron v ASIC [2012] HCA The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice shoul......
  • Get Started for Free
2 books & journal articles
  • Stepping Stones — from Corporate Fault to Directors' Personal Civil Liability
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 40-2, June 2012
    • 1 d5 Junho d5 2012
    ...NV (2010) 274 ALR 85. 45 Morley (2010) 274 ALR 205. 46 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336, 361–2 (Dixon CJ). 47 ASIC v Hellicar (2012) 286 ALR 501. 48 The High Court held that the facts indicated that the board minutes, which recorded the tabling of the draft ASX announcement and its......
  • Linking Corporate Power to Corporate Structures
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Social & Legal Studies No. 22-1, March 2013
    • 1 d5 Março d5 2013
    ...ER 929 (England).Amaca Pty Ltd v Frost [2006] NSWCA 173 (Australia).Australian Securities and Investments Commission v. Meredith Hellicar. 2012/HCA17. HighCourt of Australia (Canberra) (Australia).James Hardie and Co Pty Ltd v Hall (1998) 43 NSWLR 554 (Australia).James Hardie Industries Lim......