Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis and Another
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2013-0628 FCA B |
| Year | 2013 |
| Date | 2013 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
50 cases
-
Houston v State of New South Wales (No 2)
...249 CLR 1 Australian Energy Regulator v Snowy Hydro Limited [2014] FCA 1013 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2013] FCA 641; 220 FCR 256 Bank of NSW v Commonwealth [1948] HCA 7; 76 CLR 1 Boston Commercial Services Pty Ltd v G E Capital Finance Australasia Pty Lt......
-
Matson v Attorney-General (Cth)
...Brendan O’Connor (No 3) [2012] FCA 365 Amcor Ltd v Barnes [2016] VSC 707 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2013] FCA 641; (2013) 220 FCR 256 Brown v Petranker (1991) 22 NSWLR 717 Brundsen v Humphrey (1884) 14 QBD 141 Champerslife Pty Ltd v Manojlovski [2010] NSW......
-
Bates on behalf of the Malyangapa Part B Claim Group v Attorney General of New South Wales
...Competition and Consumer Commission v FDRA Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 429 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2013] FCA 641; 220 FCR 256 Batistatos v Roads and Traffic Authority of New South Wales [2006] HCA 27; 226 CLR 256 Bodney v Bropho [2004] FCAFC 226; 140 FCR 77 Bod......
-
BVG17 v BVH17
...the Court that the application has no reasonable prospects of succeeding: Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis [2013] FCA 641; (2013) 220 FCR 256… at 271 [45] (Reeves J). (2) With respect to the scope of s 31A of the FCA Act, French CJ and Gummow J explained in Spen......
Request a trial to view additional results
1 books & journal articles
-
From Stepping-Stones to Throwing Stones: Officers’ Liability for Corporate Compliance Failures after Cassimatis
...be achievedby Mariner. The present case is not of a type discussed in Austra lian Securities and InvestmentsCommission v Cassimatis (2013) 220 FCR 256 at [172] where it was said that to argue that financialbenefits could be offset against a possible breach of the law offended public policy.......