Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Blue Star Helium Limited (No 4)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court (Australia)
Judgment Date16 December 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 1578
Date16 December 2021


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Blue Star Helium Limited (No 4) [2021] FCA 1578

File number:

WAD 588 of 2017



Judgment of:

BANKS-SMITH J



Date of judgment:

16 December 2021



Catchwords:

CORPORATIONS - penalties and relief - where failure to comply with continuous disclosure obligations under s 674(2) of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by listed public company - where director of company who was chair and chief executive officer contravened s 180 of the Corporations Act by failing to exercise care and diligence in causing or permitting the company to contravene s 674(2) - declarations of contraventions by company and by director - where Australian Securities and Investments Commission sought disqualification of director from managing companies - whether as a matter of statutory construction pecuniary penalties must be considered before disqualification - where appropriate that disqualification be considered first - whether contraventions serious - factors to be taken into consideration - application of totality principle - whether disqualification order justified - whether pecuniary penalty justified - director disqualified and pecuniary penalty imposed



Legislation:

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180, 206C, 674, 1317DA, 1317E, 1317EA, 1317F, 1317G, Parts 2D.6, 9.4B

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 21



Cases cited:

Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue [2009] HCA 41; (2009) 239 CLR 27

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Renegade Gas Pty Ltd (trading as Supagas NSW) [2014] FCA 1135

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler [2002] NSWSC 483

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Beekink [2007] FCAFC 7

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Big Star Energy Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 1442

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International Ltd (No 3) [2010] FCA 292

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Flugge (No 2) [2017] VSC 117

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Forex Capital Trading Pty Limited, in the matter of Forex Capital Trading Pty Limited [2021] FCA 570

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) [2011] FCA 1003; (2011) 196 FCR 430

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Helou (No 2) [2020] FCA 1650

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hochtief Aktiengesellschaft [2016] FCA 1489

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 714

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Soust (No 2) [2010] FCA 388

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Vocation Limited (in liq) (No 2) [2019] FCA 1783

Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Padbury Mining Limited v Padbury Mining Limited [2016] FCA 990

Australian Securities and Investments Commission, in the matter of Sino Australia Oil and Gas Limited (in liq) v Sino Australia Oil and Gas Limited (in liq) [2016] FCA 1488

BMW Australia Ltd v Brewster [2019] HCA 45; (2019) 269 CLR 574

Commonwealth of Australia v Director, Fair Work Building Industry Inspectorate [2015] HCA 46; (2015) 258 CLR 482

Forster v Jododex Australia Pty Limited (1972) 127 CLR 421

Gillfillan v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2012] NSWCA 370

Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BFW20 by his Litigation Representative BFW20A [2020] FCAFC 121; (2020) 279 FCR 475

Morley v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (No 2) [2011] NSWCA 110

Pattinson v Australian Building and Construction Commissioner [2020] FCAFC 177; (2020) 282 FCR 580

Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority (1998) 194 CLR 355

Re Idylic Solutions Pty Ltd; Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Hobbs [2013] NSWSC 106

Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2004] HCA 42; (2004) 220 CLR 129

Rural Press Limited v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2003] HCA 75; (2003) 216 CLR 53

SZTAL v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] HCA 34; (2017) 262 CLR 362

Trade Practices Commission v CSR Ltd [1990] FCA 762; [1991] ATPR ¶41-076



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Western Australia



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Regulator and Consumer Protection



Number of paragraphs:

128



Date of hearing:

19 February 2021



Counsel for the Plaintiff:

Mr JA Halley SC with Mr M Sherman



Solicitor for the Plaintiff:

Australian Securities and Investments Commission



Counsel for the First Defendant:

The First Defendant did not appear



Counsel for the Second Defendant:

Mr SM Davies SC with Mr AJC Mossop



Solicitor for the Second Defendant:

DLA Piper Australia



ORDERS


WAD 588 of 2017

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION

Plaintiff


AND:

BLUE STAR HELIUM LIMITED (ACN 009 230 835)

First Defendant


JAMES ANDREW CRUICKSHANK

Second Defendant



order made by:

BANKS-SMITH J

DATE OF ORDER:

16 december 2021



THE COURT DECLARES THAT:


1. Pursuant to s 1317E(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the first defendant contravened s 674(2) of the Corporations Act during the period between 7 September 2015 and 15 September 2015 by failing to comply with Listing Rule 3.1 of the Australian Securities Exchange (ASX) Listing Rules by not notifying the ASX that Wade Energy Corporation (Wade Energy) was the purchaser of the assets known as the Northern Star Assets and Big Star Assets under the purchase and sale agreements (PSAs) for those assets.

2. Pursuant to s 1317E(1) of the Corporations Act, the first defendant contravened s 674(2) of the Corporations Act during the period between 7 September 2015 and 15 September 2015 by failing to comply with Listing Rule 3.1 of the ASX Listing Rules by not notifying the ASX of the cumulative information that:

(a) Wade Energy was the purchaser of the assets known as the Northern Star Assets and Big Star Assets under the PSAs;

(b) Antares Energy Ltd (now Blue Star Helium Limited) had not, prior to 15 September 2015, independently verified or otherwise determined the capacity of Wade Energy to complete under the PSAs; and

(c) Antares Energy Ltd (now Blue Star Helium Limited) had been informed by Wade Energy that it had not yet received all funding approval necessary to complete the purchase of the assets known as the Big Star Assets.

3. Pursuant to s 1317E(1) of the Corporations Act, the second defendant contravened s 180(1) of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Cruickshank v Australian Securities and Investments Commission
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 5 de agosto de 2022
    ...(No 3) [2020] FCA 1442; 148 ACSR 334; 389 ALR 17 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Blue Star Helium Limited (No 4) [2021] FCA 1578; 158 ACSR 196 File number: WAD 25 of 2022 Judgment of: ALLSOP CJ, JACKSON AND ANDERSON JJ Date of judgment: 5 August 2022 Catchwords: CORPORATI......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Penalty Hearing)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 de fevereiro de 2023
    ...Commission v Beekink [2007] FCAFC 7; (2007) 238 ALR 595 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Blue Star Helium Ltd (No 4) [2021] FCA 1578; (2021) 158 ACSR 196 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International Limited (No 3) [2010] FCA 292; (2010) 268 A......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australian Mines Limited (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 12 de maio de 2023
    ...Commission v Australian Mines Limited [2023] FCA 9 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Blue Star Helium Limited (No 4) [2021] FCA 1578 Division: General Division Registry: Western Australia National Practice Area: Commercial and Corporations to direct that those submissions,......