Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Judgment Date | 10 November 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 1384 |
| Court | Federal Court |
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384
ORDERS
VID 146 of 2019 | ||
BETWEEN: | AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION Plaintiff | |
AND: | GETSWIFT LIMITED (ACN 604 611 556) First Defendant BANE HUNTER Second Defendant JOEL RICHARD STUART MACDONALD Third Defendant BRETT EAGLE Fourth Defendant | |
order made by: | LEE J |
DATE OF ORDER: | 10 NOVEMBER 2021 |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1.The parties file by 5pm on 17 November 2021 an agreed minute or competing minutes of order to reflect these reasons.
2.The proceeding be adjourned for a case management hearing at 9:30am on 19 November 2021.
Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
CONTENTS:
AINTRODUCTION | [1] |
A.1Overview of case | [3] |
A.2The GetSwift platform and business model | [20] |
A.3Statements regarding continuous disclosure | [29] |
A.4GetSwift announcements | [35] |
A.5Summary of claims | [38] |
BPRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS | [44] |
CTHE DEFENDANTS, THE BOARD AND OTHER KEY PLAYERS | [49] |
C.1The defendants | [49] |
C.2Operations of the board of GetSwift | [53] |
C.3Other personnel at GetSwift | [57] |
DTHE EVIDENCE GENERALLY | [59] |
D.1ASIC’s evidence | [61] |
D.2The position of the Defendants | [70] |
EA DISPUTE ABOUT ASIC’S PLEADED CONTINUOUS DICLOSURE CASE | [71] |
E.1The iterations of ASIC’s pleaded case | [72] |
E.2The application to amend | [79] |
E.3Relevant principles | [83] |
E.4Pleadings and continuous disclosure cases | [86] |
E.5Consideration | [94] |
FAPPROACH TO FACT FINDING | [102] |
F.1The nature of the contest at trial | [103] |
F.2The principled approach to fact finding | [107] |
F.2.1Affidavits and the documentary case | [108] |
F.2.2The oral evidence generally | [113] |
F.2.3Burden and standard of proof | [116] |
F.3Jones v Dunkel and Civil Penalties | [123] |
GFACTUAL BACKGROUND IN RESPECT OF GETSWIFT’S CLIENTS AND SHARE PLACEMENTS | [141] |
G.1The Enterprise Clients | [145] |
G.1.1Fruit Box | [145] |
The development of the Fruit Box Agreement | [146] |
The Fruit Box Announcement | [161] |
Fruit Box’s’ Trial of the GetSwift Platform | [176] |
Ms Gordon’s involvement in the Fruit Box trial | [180] |
Termination of the Fruit Box Agreement | [184] |
Conversation between Ms Gordon andMs Mikac on 22 March 2017 | [193] |
GetSwift Board Meeting on 27 March 2017 | [195] |
Draft of Fruit Box termination announcement | [198] |
End of GetSwift engagement with Fruit Box | [200] |
G.1.2Commonwealth Bank of Australia | [203] |
The CBA Agreement | [204] |
The First and Second Meeting: 8 December 2016 and 20 January 2017 | [206] |
Non Disclosure Agreement and initial draft terms of the CBA Agreement | [209] |
The Third Meeting: 13 February 2017 | [215] |
Drafting of the CBA Announcement and CBA Agreement | [222] |
Provision of draft media announcement to CBA and negotiation of the CBA Agreement | [231] |
Initial CBA response to the draft media release | [235] |
Draft of the media release prepared by Mr Polites | [243] |
CBA handover from Mr Armstrong to Ms Kitchen | [252] |
CBA proposed amendments to the CBA Agreement and further discussions | [256] |
GetSwift reaction to the CBA revised draft of the media release | [266] |
Further negotiation of the CBA Agreement | [268] |
Mr Hunter reinserts the 55,000 figure into the draft media release and ASX announcement | [273] |
GetSwift provides CBA with the revised media release with the 55,000 figure reinserted | [276] |
Mr Budzevski and Ms Kitchen query whether GetSwift figures in media release are global | [281] |
Mr Hunter responds to CBA query about global figures | [289] |
Further consideration by Mr Budzevski and Ms Kitchen of the 55,000 figure | [296] |
Ms Kitchen again queries the 55,000 figure with Mr Polites and Mr Budzevski | [302] |
Mr Budzevski’s further consideration of the 55,000 retail merchant figure | [317] |
Further exchange of drafts of the CBA Agreement | [326] |
Execution of the CBA Agreement | [340] |
Final arrangements for the CBA Announcement | [343] |
Development of the GetSwift App for CBA | [365] |
Conduct of CBA after the CBA Announcement | [370] |
GetSwift responses to the projections queries in the ASX aware letters | [374] |
Mr Begbie’s email | [381] |
G.1.3Pizza Pan Group Pty Ltd | [383] |
GPS Delivery Tracking Project and the Pizza Hut Test Store Site | [386] |
Pizza Pan’s entry into an agreement with GetSwift | [389] |
The Pizza Hut Announcement | [413] |
Pizza Pan is not part of Pizza Hut International | [433] |
Pilot postponed | [437] |
Recommencement of the trial and decision not to continue | [441] |
G.1.4All Purpose Transport | [448] |
Preparation of the APT Agreement | [450] |
Entry into the APT Agreement | [455] |
The APT Announcement | [457] |
Variation of the APT agreement with GetSwift and issues with the csv. file | [462] |
APT’s demonstration of the GetSwift Platform to Mr Nguyen of Fantastic Furniture | [477] |
Mr Macdonald learns of the current circumstances | [482] |
GetSwift’s Weekly Transaction Reports record zero deliveries for APT | [492] |
G.1.5CITO Transport Pty Ltd | [498] |
Negotiations between CITO, PMI and GetSwift | [502] |
FRF Couriers is selected to provide the delivery services | [524] |
Entry into the CITO Agreement | [525] |
GetSwift’s engagement of FRF Couriers | [529] |
The CITO Announcement | [532] |
CITO participation limited to provision of warehousing services | [536] |
Interview with Australasian Transport News | [538] |
The alleged training | [542] |
The alleged trial of the PMI online store giving CITO access to the GetSwift Platform | [559] |
G.1.6Hungry Harvest LLC | [560] |
Negotiation of the Hungry Harvest Agreement | [561] |
Preparation of the Hungry Harvest Announcement | [568] |
G.1.7The First Placement | [573] |
Trading Halt | [573] |
Tranche 1 Placement | [578] |
Tranche 2 Placement | [587] |
G.1.8Fantastic Furniture | [595] |
Initial dealings and negotiation of the Fantastic Furniture Agreement | [596] |
Clarification of termination prior to the end of the trial period | [608] |
Preparation and release of the Fantastic Furniture and Betta Homes Announcement | [611] |
The initial trial of the GetSwift Platform by Fantastic Furniture | [628] |
Termination of the Fantastic Furniture Agreement | [632] |
G.1.9Betta Homes | [642] |
Initial dealings and negotiation of the Betta Homes Agreement | [644] |
The Fantastic Furniture & Betta Homes Announcement | [669] |
Implementation of the Betta Homes Agreement | [672] |
G.1.10Bareburger Group LLC | [685] |
Negotiation of the Bareburger Agreement | [686] |
Preparation and release of the Bareburger Announcement | [696] |
Integration with Toast | [709] |
G.1.11NA Williams | [714] |
GetSwift’s approach to Genuine Parts Company | [719] |
First contact between NA Williams and GetSwift | [722] |
27 July 2017 meeting | [724] |
Feedback from NA Williams following the meeting | [739] |
Negotiation of the NAW Agreement | [741] |
Circulation of drafts of the First NAW Announcement | [749] |
Consideration of the “1.15 billion” transactions figure | [763] |
GetSwift’s knowledge of size of addressable market and competitors’ pricing | [769] |
Further GetSwift internal circulation of a draft of the First NAW Announcement | [772] |
GetSwift dealings with Advance and O’Reilly Auto Parts | [777] |
GetSwift releases the First NAW Announcement | [778] |
Hunter’s concern that the First NAW Announcement was not marked as price sensitive | [779] |
Insertion of revenue figure in the Second NAW Announcement | [783] |
The Third NAW Announcement | [796] |
Subsequent events | [801] |
G.1.12Johnny Rockets | [802] |
Preparation of the Johnny Rockets Agreement | [803] |
Entry into the Johnny Rockets Agreement | [814] |
Preparation and release of the Johnny Rockets Announcement | [816] |
Subsequent communications | [826] |
Deferral of limited roll out | [829] |
Mr Roman’s email | [831] |
G.1.13Yum Restaurant Services Group, LLC | [833] |
Initial contact between GetSwift and Yum | [834] |
Negotiations between Pizza Hut International and GetSwift in relation to a Pilot | [840] |
Initial Proposal by GetSwift | [844] |
Pizza Hut International unable to secure two test markets for the Pilot | [861] |
Nondisclosure Agreement | [868] |
Revised Proposal by GetSwift | [869] |
Negotiations of the MSA | [880] |
Yum MSA | [893] |
Preparation and Release of the Yum Announcement | [896] |
Pizza Hut International’s reaction to the Yum Announcement | [913] |
Complaint to ASX about Yum Announcement | [925] |
Negotiation of the SOW and pilot in the Kuwait market | [933] |
G.1.14Amazon Corporate LLC | [956] |
Initial contact between GetSwift and Amazon | [957] |
Trial Hosted Services Agreement | [960] |
Pilot and Negotiation of the Amazon MSA | [964] |
Completion of a trial? | [989] |
Preparation and release of the First Amazon Announcement | [992] |
ASX reaction to the First Amazon Announcement | [999] |
Updated draft of proposed Service Order provided to Amazon | [1007] |
Preparation and release of the Second Amazon Announcement | [1008] |
Amazon’s reaction to the Second Amazon Announcement | [1018] |
Amazon aware, or agreed to, the making of a regulatory announcement | [1023] |
Continued preparation of Service Order and Service Order never entered into | [1029] |
G.1.15The Second Placement | [1034] |
Trading Halt | [1034] |
Second Placement Completion Announcement | [1041] |
Second Placement Cleansing Notice | [1050] |
G.1.162018 ASX Market Update Announcements | [1054] |
HCONTINUOUS DISCLOSURE CLAIMS | [1060] |
H.1The Relevant law | [1065] |
H.1.1Background and rationale | [1065] |
H.1.2The relevant provisions | [1072] |
H.1.3Information | [1075] |
H.1.4Awareness of information | [1077] |
H.1.5General availability of information | [1086] |
H.1.6Materiality | [1091] |
H.2Overarching Findings | [1105] |
H.2.1Existence and awareness | [1109] |
H.2.2General availability of information | [1116] |
Agreement Information | [1117] |
GetSwift Prospectus | [1118] |
Perpetually on Trial and Terminable at Will Contention | [1121] |
ASIC’s contentions | [1126] |
Consideration | [1131] |
Further omitted information | [1142] |
H.2.3Materiality | [1144] |
ASIC’s case theory | [1147] |
Information relevant to investors | [1148] |
The evidence of Mr Molony | [1152] |
Investor witnesses | [1168] |
GetSwift’s materiality contentions | [1196] |
The Absence of Quantifiable Benefits Contention | [1198] |
The Continuing Periods Contention | [1212] |
The Share Price Contention | [1230] |
The Subjective Views Contention | [1257] |
Conclusions on the proper approach to materiality in this case | [1259] |
H.3The Enterprise Clients | [1265] |
H.3.1Fruit Box | [1268] |
Fruit Box Agreement | [1269] |
Fruit Box Announcement | [1270] |
Fruit Box Agreement Information | [1277] |
Existence | [1277] |
Awareness | [1278] |
General availability | [1280] |
Materiality | [1283] |
Conclusion | [1292] |
Fruit Box Projection Information | [1293] |
Fruit Box Termination Information | [1302] |
Existence | [1302] |
Awareness | [1306] |
General availability | [1311] |
Materiality | [1312] |
Con... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Williams v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited (Initial Trial)
...Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 130; (2020) 278 FCR 450 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift [2021] FCA 1384 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63 Bodum v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98; (2011) 280 ALR 639 Boral Besser Masonry Limited v Australian Co......
-
Kumova v Davison (No 2)
...Forex Capital Trading Pty Limited [2021] FCA 570 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities Commission v McLeod [2000] WASCA 101; (2000) 22 WAR 255 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Scholz (N......
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Limited
...(No 3) (2020) 275 FCR 57; [2020] FCA 208 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Exchange Pty Ltd (2005) 148 FCR 132; [2005] FCAFC 226 Beale v Government Insurance off......
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
...Pty Ltd (2019) 140 ACSR 561; [2019] FCA 1932 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd (2020) 147 ACSR 266; [2020] FCA 1306 Australian Securities and Investm......
-
Inside Track: Competition & Consumer Law - In the media, and Cases
...1995 (Cth) sch 1 pt 2 - Classes of services Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 CORPORATIONS - the GetSwift saga - story of the rise and fall of a nascent 'tech start up' listed on the ASX - market offering 'software as a s......
-
Inside Track: Competition & Consumer Law - In the media, and Cases
...1995 (Cth) sch 1 pt 2 - Classes of services Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 CORPORATIONS - the GetSwift saga - story of the rise and fall of a nascent 'tech start up' listed on the ASX - market offering 'software as a s......
-
Inside track: Transport, shipping & logistics ' In the media; published articles, papers, reports; practice and regulation; cases; legislation
...Customs Act 1901 (Cth); Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 CORPORATIONS - the GetSwift saga - story of the rise and fall of a nascent 'tech start up' listed on the ASX - market offering 'software a......
-
Inside track: Transport, shipping & logistics ' In the media; published articles, papers, reports; practice and regulation; cases; legislation
...Customs Act 1901 (Cth); Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 CORPORATIONS - the GetSwift saga - story of the rise and fall of a nascent 'tech start up' listed on the ASX - market offering 'software a......