Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date10 November 2021
Neutral Citation[2021] FCA 1384
CourtFederal Court

Federal Court of Australia

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384

ORDERS

VID 146 of 2019

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION

Plaintiff

AND:

GETSWIFT LIMITED (ACN 604 611 556)

First Defendant

BANE HUNTER

Second Defendant

JOEL RICHARD STUART MACDONALD

Third Defendant

BRETT EAGLE

Fourth Defendant

order made by:

LEE J

DATE OF ORDER:

10 NOVEMBER 2021

THE COURT ORDERS THAT:

1.The parties file by 5pm on 17 November 2021 an agreed minute or competing minutes of order to reflect these reasons.

2.The proceeding be adjourned for a case management hearing at 9:30am on 19 November 2021.

Note:Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.

REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

CONTENTS:

AINTRODUCTION

[1]

A.1Overview of case

[3]

A.2The GetSwift platform and business model

[20]

A.3Statements regarding continuous disclosure

[29]

A.4GetSwift announcements

[35]

A.5Summary of claims

[38]

BPRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS

[44]

CTHE DEFENDANTS, THE BOARD AND OTHER KEY PLAYERS

[49]

C.1The defendants

[49]

C.2Operations of the board of GetSwift

[53]

C.3Other personnel at GetSwift

[57]

DTHE EVIDENCE GENERALLY

[59]

D.1ASIC’s evidence

[61]

D.2The position of the Defendants

[70]

EA DISPUTE ABOUT ASIC’S PLEADED CONTINUOUS DICLOSURE CASE

[71]

E.1The iterations of ASIC’s pleaded case

[72]

E.2The application to amend

[79]

E.3Relevant principles

[83]

E.4Pleadings and continuous disclosure cases

[86]

E.5Consideration

[94]

FAPPROACH TO FACT FINDING

[102]

F.1The nature of the contest at trial

[103]

F.2The principled approach to fact finding

[107]

F.2.1Affidavits and the documentary case

[108]

F.2.2The oral evidence generally

[113]

F.2.3Burden and standard of proof

[116]

F.3Jones v Dunkel and Civil Penalties

[123]

GFACTUAL BACKGROUND IN RESPECT OF GETSWIFT’S CLIENTS AND SHARE PLACEMENTS

[141]

G.1The Enterprise Clients

[145]

G.1.1Fruit Box

[145]

The development of the Fruit Box Agreement

[146]

The Fruit Box Announcement

[161]

Fruit Box’s’ Trial of the GetSwift Platform

[176]

Ms Gordon’s involvement in the Fruit Box trial

[180]

Termination of the Fruit Box Agreement

[184]

Conversation between Ms Gordon andMs Mikac on 22 March 2017

[193]

GetSwift Board Meeting on 27 March 2017

[195]

Draft of Fruit Box termination announcement

[198]

End of GetSwift engagement with Fruit Box

[200]

G.1.2Commonwealth Bank of Australia

[203]

The CBA Agreement

[204]

The First and Second Meeting: 8 December 2016 and 20 January 2017

[206]

Non Disclosure Agreement and initial draft terms of the CBA Agreement

[209]

The Third Meeting: 13 February 2017

[215]

Drafting of the CBA Announcement and CBA Agreement

[222]

Provision of draft media announcement to CBA and negotiation of the CBA Agreement

[231]

Initial CBA response to the draft media release

[235]

Draft of the media release prepared by Mr Polites

[243]

CBA handover from Mr Armstrong to Ms Kitchen

[252]

CBA proposed amendments to the CBA Agreement and further discussions

[256]

GetSwift reaction to the CBA revised draft of the media release

[266]

Further negotiation of the CBA Agreement

[268]

Mr Hunter reinserts the 55,000 figure into the draft media release and ASX announcement

[273]

GetSwift provides CBA with the revised media release with the 55,000 figure reinserted

[276]

Mr Budzevski and Ms Kitchen query whether GetSwift figures in media release are global

[281]

Mr Hunter responds to CBA query about global figures

[289]

Further consideration by Mr Budzevski and Ms Kitchen of the 55,000 figure

[296]

Ms Kitchen again queries the 55,000 figure with Mr Polites and Mr Budzevski

[302]

Mr Budzevski’s further consideration of the 55,000 retail merchant figure

[317]

Further exchange of drafts of the CBA Agreement

[326]

Execution of the CBA Agreement

[340]

Final arrangements for the CBA Announcement

[343]

Development of the GetSwift App for CBA

[365]

Conduct of CBA after the CBA Announcement

[370]

GetSwift responses to the projections queries in the ASX aware letters

[374]

Mr Begbie’s email

[381]

G.1.3Pizza Pan Group Pty Ltd

[383]

GPS Delivery Tracking Project and the Pizza Hut Test Store Site

[386]

Pizza Pan’s entry into an agreement with GetSwift

[389]

The Pizza Hut Announcement

[413]

Pizza Pan is not part of Pizza Hut International

[433]

Pilot postponed

[437]

Recommencement of the trial and decision not to continue

[441]

G.1.4All Purpose Transport

[448]

Preparation of the APT Agreement

[450]

Entry into the APT Agreement

[455]

The APT Announcement

[457]

Variation of the APT agreement with GetSwift and issues with the csv. file

[462]

APT’s demonstration of the GetSwift Platform to Mr Nguyen of Fantastic Furniture

[477]

Mr Macdonald learns of the current circumstances

[482]

GetSwift’s Weekly Transaction Reports record zero deliveries for APT

[492]

G.1.5CITO Transport Pty Ltd

[498]

Negotiations between CITO, PMI and GetSwift

[502]

FRF Couriers is selected to provide the delivery services

[524]

Entry into the CITO Agreement

[525]

GetSwift’s engagement of FRF Couriers

[529]

The CITO Announcement

[532]

CITO participation limited to provision of warehousing services

[536]

Interview with Australasian Transport News

[538]

The alleged training

[542]

The alleged trial of the PMI online store giving CITO access to the GetSwift Platform

[559]

G.1.6Hungry Harvest LLC

[560]

Negotiation of the Hungry Harvest Agreement

[561]

Preparation of the Hungry Harvest Announcement

[568]

G.1.7The First Placement

[573]

Trading Halt

[573]

Tranche 1 Placement

[578]

Tranche 2 Placement

[587]

G.1.8Fantastic Furniture

[595]

Initial dealings and negotiation of the Fantastic Furniture Agreement

[596]

Clarification of termination prior to the end of the trial period

[608]

Preparation and release of the Fantastic Furniture and Betta Homes Announcement

[611]

The initial trial of the GetSwift Platform by Fantastic Furniture

[628]

Termination of the Fantastic Furniture Agreement

[632]

G.1.9Betta Homes

[642]

Initial dealings and negotiation of the Betta Homes Agreement

[644]

The Fantastic Furniture & Betta Homes Announcement

[669]

Implementation of the Betta Homes Agreement

[672]

G.1.10Bareburger Group LLC

[685]

Negotiation of the Bareburger Agreement

[686]

Preparation and release of the Bareburger Announcement

[696]

Integration with Toast

[709]

G.1.11NA Williams

[714]

GetSwift’s approach to Genuine Parts Company

[719]

First contact between NA Williams and GetSwift

[722]

27 July 2017 meeting

[724]

Feedback from NA Williams following the meeting

[739]

Negotiation of the NAW Agreement

[741]

Circulation of drafts of the First NAW Announcement

[749]

Consideration of the “1.15 billion” transactions figure

[763]

GetSwift’s knowledge of size of addressable market and competitors’ pricing

[769]

Further GetSwift internal circulation of a draft of the First NAW Announcement

[772]

GetSwift dealings with Advance and O’Reilly Auto Parts

[777]

GetSwift releases the First NAW Announcement

[778]

Hunter’s concern that the First NAW Announcement was not marked as price sensitive

[779]

Insertion of revenue figure in the Second NAW Announcement

[783]

The Third NAW Announcement

[796]

Subsequent events

[801]

G.1.12Johnny Rockets

[802]

Preparation of the Johnny Rockets Agreement

[803]

Entry into the Johnny Rockets Agreement

[814]

Preparation and release of the Johnny Rockets Announcement

[816]

Subsequent communications

[826]

Deferral of limited roll out

[829]

Mr Roman’s email

[831]

G.1.13Yum Restaurant Services Group, LLC

[833]

Initial contact between GetSwift and Yum

[834]

Negotiations between Pizza Hut International and GetSwift in relation to a Pilot

[840]

Initial Proposal by GetSwift

[844]

Pizza Hut International unable to secure two test markets for the Pilot

[861]

Nondisclosure Agreement

[868]

Revised Proposal by GetSwift

[869]

Negotiations of the MSA

[880]

Yum MSA

[893]

Preparation and Release of the Yum Announcement

[896]

Pizza Hut International’s reaction to the Yum Announcement

[913]

Complaint to ASX about Yum Announcement

[925]

Negotiation of the SOW and pilot in the Kuwait market

[933]

G.1.14Amazon Corporate LLC

[956]

Initial contact between GetSwift and Amazon

[957]

Trial Hosted Services Agreement

[960]

Pilot and Negotiation of the Amazon MSA

[964]

Completion of a trial?

[989]

Preparation and release of the First Amazon Announcement

[992]

ASX reaction to the First Amazon Announcement

[999]

Updated draft of proposed Service Order provided to Amazon

[1007]

Preparation and release of the Second Amazon Announcement

[1008]

Amazon’s reaction to the Second Amazon Announcement

[1018]

Amazon aware, or agreed to, the making of a regulatory announcement

[1023]

Continued preparation of Service Order and Service Order never entered into

[1029]

G.1.15The Second Placement

[1034]

Trading Halt

[1034]

Second Placement Completion Announcement

[1041]

Second Placement Cleansing Notice

[1050]

G.1.162018 ASX Market Update Announcements

[1054]

HCONTINUOUS DISCLOSURE CLAIMS

[1060]

H.1The Relevant law

[1065]

H.1.1Background and rationale

[1065]

H.1.2The relevant provisions

[1072]

H.1.3Information

[1075]

H.1.4Awareness of information

[1077]

H.1.5General availability of information

[1086]

H.1.6Materiality

[1091]

H.2Overarching Findings

[1105]

H.2.1Existence and awareness

[1109]

H.2.2General availability of information

[1116]

Agreement Information

[1117]

GetSwift Prospectus

[1118]

Perpetually on Trial and Terminable at Will Contention

[1121]

ASIC’s contentions

[1126]

Consideration

[1131]

Further omitted information

[1142]

H.2.3Materiality

[1144]

ASIC’s case theory

[1147]

Information relevant to investors

[1148]

The evidence of Mr Molony

[1152]

Investor witnesses

[1168]

GetSwift’s materiality contentions

[1196]

The Absence of Quantifiable Benefits Contention

[1198]

The Continuing Periods Contention

[1212]

The Share Price Contention

[1230]

The Subjective Views Contention

[1257]

Conclusions on the proper approach to materiality in this case

[1259]

H.3The Enterprise Clients

[1265]

H.3.1Fruit Box

[1268]

Fruit Box Agreement

[1269]

Fruit Box Announcement

[1270]

Fruit Box Agreement Information

[1277]

Existence

[1277]

Awareness

[1278]

General availability

[1280]

Materiality

[1283]

Conclusion

[1292]

Fruit Box Projection Information

[1293]

Fruit Box Termination Information

[1302]

Existence

[1302]

Awareness

[1306]

General availability

[1311]

Materiality

[1312]

Con...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
13 cases
  • Williams v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited (Initial Trial)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 7 April 2022
    ...Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 130; (2020) 278 FCR 450 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift [2021] FCA 1384 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63 Bodum v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98; (2011) 280 ALR 639 Boral Besser Masonry Limited v Australian Co......
  • Kumova v Davison (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 9 January 2023
    ...Forex Capital Trading Pty Limited [2021] FCA 570 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities Commission v McLeod [2000] WASCA 101; (2000) 22 WAR 255 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Scholz (N......
  • Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Limited
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • 23 March 2023
    ...(No 3) (2020) 275 FCR 57; [2020] FCA 208 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Exchange Pty Ltd (2005) 148 FCR 132; [2005] FCAFC 226 Beale v Government Insurance off......
  • Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 29 November 2022
    ...Pty Ltd (2019) 140 ACSR 561; [2019] FCA 1932 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd (2020) 147 ACSR 266; [2020] FCA 1306 Australian Securities and Investm......
  • Get Started for Free
5 firm's commentaries