Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Judgment Date | 10 November 2021 |
| Neutral Citation | [2021] FCA 1384 |
Federal Court of Australia
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384
ORDERS
VID 146 of 2019 | ||
| ||
BETWEEN: |
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION Plaintiff |
|
AND: |
GETSWIFT LIMITED (ACN 604 611 556) First Defendant BANE HUNTER Second Defendant JOEL RICHARD STUART MACDONALD Third Defendant BRETT EAGLE Fourth Defendant |
|
order made by: |
LEE J |
DATE OF ORDER: |
10 NOVEMBER 2021 |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
1. The parties file by 5pm on 17 November 2021 an agreed minute or competing minutes of order to reflect these reasons.
2. The proceeding be adjourned for a case management hearing at 9:30am on 19 November 2021.
Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.
REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
CONTENTS:
A INTRODUCTION |
[1] |
A.1 Overview of case |
[3] |
A.2 The GetSwift platform and business model |
[20] |
A.3 Statements regarding continuous disclosure |
[29] |
A.4 GetSwift announcements |
[35] |
A.5 Summary of claims |
[38] |
B PRINCIPAL CONCLUSIONS |
[44] |
C THE DEFENDANTS, THE BOARD AND OTHER KEY PLAYERS |
[49] |
C.1 The defendants |
[49] |
C.2 Operations of the board of GetSwift |
[53] |
C.3 Other personnel at GetSwift |
[57] |
D THE EVIDENCE GENERALLY |
[59] |
D.1 ASIC’s evidence |
[61] |
D.2 The position of the Defendants |
[70] |
E A DISPUTE ABOUT ASIC’S PLEADED CONTINUOUS DICLOSURE CASE |
[71] |
E.1 The iterations of ASIC’s pleaded case |
[72] |
E.2 The application to amend |
[79] |
E.3 Relevant principles |
[83] |
E.4 Pleadings and continuous disclosure cases |
[86] |
E.5 Consideration |
[94] |
F APPROACH TO FACT FINDING |
[102] |
F.1 The nature of the contest at trial |
[103] |
F.2 The principled approach to fact finding |
[107] |
F.2.1 Affidavits and the documentary case |
[108] |
F.2.2 The oral evidence generally |
[113] |
F.2.3 Burden and standard of proof |
[116] |
F.3 Jones v Dunkel and Civil Penalties |
[123] |
G FACTUAL BACKGROUND IN RESPECT OF GETSWIFT’S CLIENTS AND SHARE PLACEMENTS |
[141] |
G.1 The Enterprise Clients |
[145] |
G.1.1 Fruit Box |
[145] |
The development of the Fruit Box Agreement |
[146] |
The Fruit Box Announcement |
[161] |
Fruit Box’s’ Trial of the GetSwift Platform |
[176] |
Ms Gordon’s involvement in the Fruit Box trial |
[180] |
Termination of the Fruit Box Agreement |
[184] |
Conversation between Ms Gordon and Ms Mikac on 22 March 2017 |
[193] |
GetSwift Board Meeting on 27 March 2017 |
[195] |
Draft of Fruit Box termination announcement |
[198] |
End of GetSwift engagement with Fruit Box |
[200] |
G.1.2 Commonwealth Bank of Australia |
[203] |
The CBA Agreement |
[204] |
The First and Second Meeting: 8 December 2016 and 20 January 2017 |
[206] |
Non Disclosure Agreement and initial draft terms of the CBA Agreement |
[209] |
The Third Meeting: 13 February 2017 |
[215] |
Drafting of the CBA Announcement and CBA Agreement |
[222] |
Provision of draft media announcement to CBA and negotiation of the CBA Agreement |
[231] |
Initial CBA response to the draft media release |
[235] |
Draft of the media release prepared by Mr Polites |
[243] |
CBA handover from Mr Armstrong to Ms Kitchen |
[252] |
CBA proposed amendments to the CBA Agreement and further discussions |
[256] |
GetSwift reaction to the CBA revised draft of the media release |
[266] |
Further negotiation of the CBA Agreement |
[268] |
Mr Hunter reinserts the 55,000 figure into the draft media release and ASX announcement |
[273] |
GetSwift provides CBA with the revised media release with the 55,000 figure reinserted |
[276] |
Mr Budzevski and Ms Kitchen query whether GetSwift figures in media release are global |
[281] |
Mr Hunter responds to CBA query about global figures |
[289] |
Further consideration by Mr Budzevski and Ms Kitchen of the 55,000 figure |
[296] |
Ms Kitchen again queries the 55,000 figure with Mr Polites and Mr Budzevski |
[302] |
Mr Budzevski’s further consideration of the 55,000 retail merchant figure |
[317] |
Further exchange of drafts of the CBA Agreement |
[326] |
Execution of the CBA Agreement |
[340] |
Final arrangements for the CBA Announcement |
[343] |
Development of the GetSwift App for CBA |
[365] |
Conduct of CBA after the CBA Announcement |
[370] |
GetSwift responses to the projections queries in the ASX aware letters |
[374] |
Mr Begbie’s email |
[381] |
G.1.3 Pizza Pan Group Pty Ltd |
[383] |
GPS Delivery Tracking Project and the Pizza Hut Test Store Site |
[386] |
Pizza Pan’s entry into an agreement with GetSwift |
[389] |
The Pizza Hut Announcement |
[413] |
Pizza Pan is not part of Pizza Hut International |
[433] |
Pilot postponed |
[437] |
Recommencement of the trial and decision not to continue |
[441] |
G.1.4 All Purpose Transport |
[448] |
Preparation of the APT Agreement |
[450] |
Entry into the APT Agreement |
[455] |
The APT Announcement |
[457] |
Variation of the APT agreement with GetSwift and issues with the csv. file |
[462] |
APT’s demonstration of the GetSwift Platform to Mr Nguyen of Fantastic Furniture |
[477] |
Mr Macdonald learns of the current circumstances |
[482] |
GetSwift’s Weekly Transaction Reports record zero deliveries for APT |
[492] |
G.1.5 CITO Transport Pty Ltd |
[498] |
Negotiations between CITO, PMI and GetSwift |
[502] |
FRF Couriers is selected to provide the delivery services |
[524] |
Entry into the CITO Agreement |
[525] |
GetSwift’s engagement of FRF Couriers |
[529] |
The CITO Announcement |
[532] |
CITO participation limited to provision of warehousing services |
[536] |
Interview with Australasian Transport News |
[538] |
The alleged training |
[542] |
The alleged trial of the PMI online store giving CITO access to the GetSwift Platform |
[559] |
G.1.6 Hungry Harvest LLC |
[560] |
Negotiation of the Hungry Harvest Agreement |
[561] |
Preparation of the Hungry Harvest Announcement |
[568] |
G.1.7 The First Placement |
[573] |
Trading Halt |
[573] |
Tranche 1 Placement |
[578] |
Tranche 2 Placement |
[587] |
G.1.8 Fantastic Furniture |
[595] |
Initial dealings and negotiation of the Fantastic Furniture Agreement |
[596] |
Clarification of termination prior to the end of the trial period |
[608] |
Preparation and release of the Fantastic Furniture and Betta Homes Announcement |
[611] |
The initial trial of the GetSwift Platform by Fantastic Furniture |
[628] |
Termination of the Fantastic Furniture Agreement |
[632] |
G.1.9 Betta Homes |
[642] |
Initial dealings and negotiation of the Betta Homes Agreement |
[644] |
The Fantastic Furniture & Betta Homes Announcement |
[669] |
Implementation of the Betta Homes Agreement |
[672] |
G.1.10 Bareburger Group LLC |
[685] |
Negotiation of the Bareburger Agreement |
[686] |
Preparation and release of the Bareburger Announcement |
[696] |
Integration with Toast |
[709] |
G.1.11 NA Williams |
[714] |
GetSwift’s approach to Genuine Parts Company |
[719] |
First contact between NA Williams and GetSwift |
[722] |
27 July 2017 meeting |
[724] |
Feedback from NA Williams following the meeting |
[739] |
Negotiation of the NAW Agreement |
[741] |
Circulation of drafts of the First NAW Announcement |
[749] |
Consideration of the “1.15 billion” transactions figure |
[763] |
GetSwift’s knowledge of size of addressable market and competitors’ pricing |
[769] |
Further GetSwift internal circulation of a draft of the First NAW Announcement |
[772] |
GetSwift dealings with Advance and O’Reilly Auto Parts |
[777] |
GetSwift releases the First NAW Announcement |
[778] |
Hunter’s concern that the First NAW Announcement was not marked as price sensitive |
[779] |
Insertion of revenue figure in the Second NAW Announcement |
[783] |
The Third NAW Announcement |
[796] |
Subsequent events |
[801] |
G.1.12 Johnny Rockets |
[802] |
Preparation of the Johnny Rockets Agreement |
[803] |
Entry into the Johnny Rockets Agreement |
[814] |
Preparation and release of the Johnny Rockets Announcement |
[816] |
Subsequent communications |
[826] |
Deferral of limited roll out |
[829] |
Mr Roman’s email |
[831] |
G.1.13 Yum Restaurant Services Group, LLC |
[833] |
Initial contact between GetSwift and Yum |
[834] |
Negotiations between Pizza Hut International and GetSwift in relation to a Pilot |
[840] |
Initial Proposal by GetSwift |
[844] |
Pizza Hut International unable to secure two test markets for the Pilot |
[861] |
Non disclosure Agreement |
[868] |
Revised Proposal by GetSwift |
[869] |
Negotiations of the MSA |
[880] |
Yum MSA |
[893] |
Preparation and Release of the Yum Announcement |
[896] |
Pizza Hut International’s reaction to the Yum Announcement |
[913] |
Complaint to ASX about Yum Announcement |
[925] |
Negotiation of the SOW and pilot in the Kuwait market |
[933] |
G.1.14 Amazon Corporate LLC |
[956] |
Initial contact between GetSwift and Amazon |
[957] |
Trial Hosted Services Agreement |
[960] |
Pilot and Negotiation of the Amazon MSA |
[964] |
Completion of a trial? |
[989] |
Preparation and release of the First Amazon Announcement |
[992] |
ASX reaction to the First Amazon Announcement |
[999] |
Updated draft of proposed Service Order provided to Amazon |
[1007] |
Preparation and release of the Second Amazon Announcement |
[1008] |
Amazon’s reaction to the Second Amazon Announcement |
[1018] |
Amazon aware, or agreed to, the making of a regulatory announcement |
[1023] |
Continued preparation of Service Order and Service Order never entered into |
[1029] |
G.1.15 The Second Placement |
[1034] |
Trading Halt |
[1034] |
Second Placement Completion Announcement |
[1041] |
Second Placement Cleansing Notice |
[1050] |
G.1.16 2018 ASX Market Update Announcements |
[1054] |
H CONTINUOUS DISCLOSURE CLAIMS |
[1060] |
H.1 The Relevant law |
[1065] |
H.1.1 Background and rationale |
[1065] |
H.1.2 The relevant provisions |
[1072] |
H.1.3 Information |
[1075] |
H.1.4 Awareness of information |
[1077] |
H.1.5 General availability of information |
[1086] |
H.1.6 Materiality |
[1091] |
H.2 Overarching Findings |
[1105] |
H.2.1 Existence and awareness |
[1109] |
H.2.2 General availability of information |
[1116] |
Agreement Information |
[1117] |
GetSwift Prospectus |
[1118] |
Perpetually on Trial and Terminable at Will Contention |
[1121] |
ASIC’s contentions |
[1126] |
Consideration |
[1131] |
Further omitted information |
[1142] |
H.2.3 Materiality |
[1144] |
ASIC’s case theory |
[1147] |
Information relevant to investors |
[1148] |
The evidence of Mr Molony |
[1152] |
Investor witnesses |
[1168] |
GetSwift’s materiality contentions |
[1196] |
The Absence of Quantifiable Benefits Contention |
[1198] |
The Continuing Periods Contention |
[1212] |
The Share Price Contention |
[1230] |
The Subjective Views Contention |
[1257] |
Conclusions on the proper approach to materiality in this case |
[1259] |
H.3 The Enterprise Clients |
[1265] |
H.3.1 Fruit Box |
[1268] |
Fruit Box Agreement |
[1269] |
Fruit Box Announcement |
[1270] |
Fruit Box Agreement Information |
[1277] |
Existence |
[1277] |
Awareness |
[1278] |
General availability |
[1280] |
Materiality |
[1283] |
Conclusion |
[1292] |
Fruit Box Projection Information |
[1293] |
Fruit Box Termination Information |
[1302] |
Existence |
[1302] |
Awareness |
[1306] |
General availability |
[1311] |
Materiality |
[1312] |
Con... |
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Williams v Toyota Motor Corporation Australia Limited (Initial Trial)
...Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2020] FCAFC 130; (2020) 278 FCR 450 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift [2021] FCA 1384 Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63 Bodum v DKSH Australia Pty Ltd [2011] FCAFC 98; (2011) 280 ALR 639 Boral Besser Masonry Limited v Australian Co......
-
Kumova v Davison (No 2)
...Forex Capital Trading Pty Limited [2021] FCA 570 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities Commission v McLeod [2000] WASCA 101; (2000) 22 WAR 255 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Scholz (N......
-
Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Mazda Australia Pty Limited
...(No 3) (2020) 275 FCR 57; [2020] FCA 208 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Exchange Pty Ltd (2005) 148 FCR 132; [2005] FCAFC 226 Beale v Government Insurance off......
-
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia
...Pty Ltd (2019) 140 ACSR 561; [2019] FCA 1932 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd (2020) 147 ACSR 266; [2020] FCA 1306 Australian Securities and Investm......
-
Inside Track: Competition & Consumer Law - In the media, and Cases
...1995 (Cth) sch 1 pt 2 - Classes of services Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 CORPORATIONS - the GetSwift saga - story of the rise and fall of a nascent 'tech start up' listed on the ASX - market offering 'software as a s......
-
Inside Track: Competition & Consumer Law - In the media, and Cases
...1995 (Cth) sch 1 pt 2 - Classes of services Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 CORPORATIONS - the GetSwift saga - story of the rise and fall of a nascent 'tech start up' listed on the ASX - market offering 'software as a s......
-
Inside track: Transport, shipping & logistics ' In the media; published articles, papers, reports; practice and regulation; cases; legislation
...Customs Act 1901 (Cth); Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 CORPORATIONS - the GetSwift saga - story of the rise and fall of a nascent 'tech start up' listed on the ASX - market offering 'software a......
-
Inside track: Transport, shipping & logistics ' In the media; published articles, papers, reports; practice and regulation; cases; legislation
...Customs Act 1901 (Cth); Evidence Act 1995 (NSW). Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 CORPORATIONS - the GetSwift saga - story of the rise and fall of a nascent 'tech start up' listed on the ASX - market offering 'software a......