Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Penalty Hearing)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtFederal Court
Judgment Date16 February 2023
Neutral Citation[2023] FCA 100
Date16 February 2023
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Penalty Hearing) [2023] FCA 100


Federal Court of Australia

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Penalty Hearing) [2023] FCA 100

File number:

VID 146 of 2019



Judgment of:

LEE J



Date of judgment:

16 February 2023



Catchwords:

CORPORATIONS – the GetSwift saga – spectacular fall of market darling ‘tech start-up’ – liability judgment 2,618 paragraphs long – declarations of scores of contraventions of ss 180 and 674 of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by company and three directors – company re-domiciled to Canada during currency of regulatory proceeding – company placed into voluntary liquidation despite undertakings given to Court – no appearance by company, ringleader and second in command

CORPORATIONS – Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) seeking imposition of pecuniary penalties on company and three directors in respect of contraventions of civil penalty provisions – ASIC seeking disqualification orders against three directors – survey of principles of penalty and disqualification – contraventions serious and materially prejudicial to the market – contrition non-existent for two contraveners – general and specific deterrence warrant disqualification and penalty orders



Legislation:

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 12DA

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180(1), 206C(1), 206E(1),674, 674(2A), 600K, 1041H, 1317E, 1317DA, 1317G(1A), 1317G(1B), 1317G(1), 1657, Sch 2 (Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations)) ss 90-10, 90-15, 90-20

Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 546

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37P

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 10.24

Corporate Law Reform Bill 1992 (Cth)



Cases cited:

Adler v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2003] NSWCA 131; (2003) 179 FLR 1

Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; (2022) 96 ALJR 426

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd [2019] FCA 786; (2019) 370 ALR 637

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; (2016) 340 ALR 25

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 875

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki [2018] FCAFC 73; (2018) 262 FCR 243

Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) [2017] FCA 521

Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith [2008] FCAFC 8; (2008) 165 FCR 560

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler [2002] NSWSC 483; (2002) 42 ACSR 80

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Beekink [2007] FCAFC 7; (2007) 238 ALR 595

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Blue Star Helium Ltd (No 4) [2021] FCA 1578; (2021) 158 ACSR 196

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International Limited (No 3) [2010] FCA 292; (2010) 268 ALR 303

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Flugge (No 2) [2017] VSC 117; (2017) 342 ALR 478

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) [2011] FCA 1003; (2011) 196 FCR 430

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; (2012) 91 ACSR 640

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 714; (2009) 259 ALR 116

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MobiSuper Pty Limited [2022] FCA 990

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Newcrest Mining Ltd [2014] FCA 698; (2014) 101 ACSR 46

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rio Tinto Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 184

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sino Australia Oil and Gas Ltd (in liq) [2016] FCA 1488; (2016) 118 ACSR 43

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Squirrel Superannuation Services Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 702

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac [2019] FCA 2147

Australian Securities Commission v Donovan (1998) 28 ACSR 583

Cruickshank v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2022] FCAFC 128; (2022) 403 ALR 67

Djordjevich v Rohrt [2021] VSC 178

Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 6; (2012) 200 FCR 296

Hall v Poolman [2009] NSWCA 64; (2009) 75 NSWLR 99

LM Investment Mgmt Ltd v Drake [2017] QSC 34

Murrihy v Betezy.com.au Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1146; (2013) 221 FCR 118

Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations v Murray [2015] FCA 346

Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2004] HCA 42; (2004) 220 CLR 129

Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; (2012) 287 ALR 249

Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) ATPR 452,135

viagogo AG v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2022] FCAFC 87



Division:

General Division



Registry:

New South Wales



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub‑area:

Regulator and Consumer Protection



Number of paragraphs:

162



Date of hearing:

30–31 January 2023



Counsel for the Plaintiff:

Mr P Solomon KC, Ms N Moncrief and Ms G Westgarth



Solicitor for the Plaintiff:

Johnson Winter & Slattery



Counsel for the First Defendant:

The First Defendant did not appear



Counsel for the Second Defendant:

The Second Defendant did not appear



Counsel for the Third Defendant:

The Third Defendant did not appear



Counsel for the Fourth Defendant:

Ms B Ng



Solicitor for the Fourth Defendant:

Baker McKenzie



ORDERS


VID 146 of 2019

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION

Plaintiff


AND:

GETSWIFT LIMITED (ACN 604 611 556)

First Defendant


BANE HUNTER

Second Defendant


JOEL RICHARD STUART MACDONALD

Third Defendant


BRETT EAGLE

Fourth Defendant



order made by:

LEE J

DATE OF ORDER:

16 FEBRUARY 2023



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


GetSwift Limited (in liq)

  1. Leave be granted nunc pro tunc pursuant to s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) to continue this proceeding against GetSwift Limited (in liq).

  2. GetSwift Limited (in liq) pay to the Commonwealth of Australia, within 30 days of the date of these Orders, a pecuniary penalty of $15,000,000, pursuant to s 1317G(1A) of the Corporations Act, in respect of the contraventions of s 674(2) of the Corporations Act identified in Orders 1–22 of the Orders dated 26 November 2021.

Mr Hunter

  1. Bane Hunter pay to the Commonwealth of Australia, within 30 days of the date of these Orders, a pecuniary penalty of $2,000,000, pursuant to s 1317G(1) and s 1317G(1A) of the Corporations Act in respect of his contraventions of s 180(1) and s 674(2A) of the...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 cases