Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Penalty Hearing)
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Court | Federal Court |
| Judgment Date | 16 February 2023 |
| Neutral Citation | [2023] FCA 100 |
| Date | 16 February 2023 |
Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Penalty Hearing) [2023] FCA 100
|
File number: |
VID 146 of 2019 |
|
|
|
|
Judgment of: |
LEE J |
|
|
|
|
Date of judgment: |
16 February 2023 |
|
|
|
|
Catchwords: |
CORPORATIONS – the GetSwift saga – spectacular fall of market darling ‘tech start-up’ – liability judgment 2,618 paragraphs long – declarations of scores of contraventions of ss 180 and 674 of Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) by company and three directors – company re-domiciled to Canada during currency of regulatory proceeding – company placed into voluntary liquidation despite undertakings given to Court – no appearance by company, ringleader and second in command CORPORATIONS – Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC) seeking imposition of pecuniary penalties on company and three directors in respect of contraventions of civil penalty provisions – ASIC seeking disqualification orders against three directors – survey of principles of penalty and disqualification – contraventions serious and materially prejudicial to the market – contrition non-existent for two contraveners – general and specific deterrence warrant disqualification and penalty orders |
|
|
|
|
Legislation: |
Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) s 12DA Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 180(1), 206C(1), 206E(1),674, 674(2A), 600K, 1041H, 1317E, 1317DA, 1317G(1A), 1317G(1B), 1317G(1), 1657, Sch 2 (Insolvency Practice Schedule (Corporations)) ss 90-10, 90-15, 90-20 Fair Work Act 2009 (Cth) s 546 Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) s 37P Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 10.24 Corporate Law Reform Bill 1992 (Cth) |
|
|
|
|
Cases cited: |
Adler v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2003] NSWCA 131; (2003) 179 FLR 1 Australian Building and Construction Commissioner v Pattinson [2022] HCA 13; (2022) 96 ALJR 426 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v PT Garuda Indonesia Ltd [2019] FCA 786; (2019) 370 ALR 637 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Reckitt Benckiser (Australia) Pty Ltd [2016] FCAFC 181; (2016) 340 ALR 25 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Samsung Electronics Australia Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 875 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd [2013] HCA 54; (2013) 250 CLR 640 Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Yazaki [2018] FCAFC 73; (2018) 262 FCR 243 Australian Institute of Professional Education Pty Ltd (in liq) [2017] FCA 521 Australian Ophthalmic Supplies Pty Ltd v McAlary-Smith [2008] FCAFC 8; (2008) 165 FCR 560 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Adler [2002] NSWSC 483; (2002) 42 ACSR 80 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Beekink [2007] FCAFC 7; (2007) 238 ALR 595 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Blue Star Helium Ltd (No 4) [2021] FCA 1578; (2021) 158 ACSR 196 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Citrofresh International Limited (No 3) [2010] FCA 292; (2010) 268 ALR 303 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Flugge (No 2) [2017] VSC 117; (2017) 342 ALR 478 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Healey (No 2) [2011] FCA 1003; (2011) 196 FCR 430 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Lindberg [2012] VSC 332; (2012) 91 ACSR 640 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 714; (2009) 259 ALR 116 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MobiSuper Pty Limited [2022] FCA 990 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Newcrest Mining Ltd [2014] FCA 698; (2014) 101 ACSR 46 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Rio Tinto Limited (No 2) [2022] FCA 184 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Sino Australia Oil and Gas Ltd (in liq) [2016] FCA 1488; (2016) 118 ACSR 43 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Squirrel Superannuation Services Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 702 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac [2019] FCA 2147 Australian Securities Commission v Donovan (1998) 28 ACSR 583 Cruickshank v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2022] FCAFC 128; (2022) 403 ALR 67 Djordjevich v Rohrt [2021] VSC 178 Grimaldi v Chameleon Mining NL (No 2) [2012] FCAFC 6; (2012) 200 FCR 296 Hall v Poolman [2009] NSWCA 64; (2009) 75 NSWLR 99 LM Investment Mgmt Ltd v Drake [2017] QSC 34 Murrihy v Betezy.com.au Pty Ltd (No 2) [2013] FCA 1146; (2013) 221 FCR 118 Registrar of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Corporations v Murray [2015] FCA 346 Rich v Australian Securities and Investments Commission [2004] HCA 42; (2004) 220 CLR 129 Singtel Optus Pty Ltd v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2012] FCAFC 20; (2012) 287 ALR 249 Trade Practices Commission v CSR Limited (1991) ATPR 452,135 viagogo AG v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission [2022] FCAFC 87 |
|
|
|
|
Division: |
|
|
|
|
|
Registry: |
|
|
|
|
|
National Practice Area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Sub‑area: |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of paragraphs: |
162 |
|
|
|
|
Date of hearing: |
30–31 January 2023 |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Plaintiff: |
Mr P Solomon KC, Ms N Moncrief and Ms G Westgarth |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Plaintiff: |
Johnson Winter & Slattery |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the First Defendant: |
The First Defendant did not appear |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Second Defendant: |
The Second Defendant did not appear |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Third Defendant: |
The Third Defendant did not appear |
|
|
|
|
Counsel for the Fourth Defendant: |
Ms B Ng |
|
|
|
|
Solicitor for the Fourth Defendant: |
Baker McKenzie |
ORDERS
|
|
VID 146 of 2019 |
|
|
|
||
|
BETWEEN: |
AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION Plaintiff
|
|
|
AND: |
GETSWIFT LIMITED (ACN 604 611 556) First Defendant
BANE HUNTER Second Defendant
JOEL RICHARD STUART MACDONALD Third Defendant BRETT EAGLE Fourth Defendant
|
|
|
order made by: |
LEE J |
|
DATE OF ORDER: |
16 FEBRUARY 2023 |
THE COURT ORDERS THAT:
GetSwift Limited (in liq)
-
Leave be granted nunc pro tunc pursuant to s 500(2) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Corporations Act) to continue this proceeding against GetSwift Limited (in liq).
-
GetSwift Limited (in liq) pay to the Commonwealth of Australia, within 30 days of the date of these Orders, a pecuniary penalty of $15,000,000, pursuant to s 1317G(1A) of the Corporations Act, in respect of the contraventions of s 674(2) of the Corporations Act identified in Orders 1–22 of the Orders dated 26 November 2021.
Mr Hunter
Bane Hunter pay to the Commonwealth of Australia, within 30 days of the date of these Orders, a pecuniary penalty of $2,000,000, pursuant to s 1317G(1) and s 1317G(1A) of the Corporations Act in respect of his contraventions of s 180(1) and s 674(2A) of the...
Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI
Get Started for FreeUnlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial
Transform your legal research with vLex
-
Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform
-
Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues
-
Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options
-
Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions
-
Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms
-
Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations
Start Your 7-day Trial
-
Chief Executive Officer of the Australian Transaction Reports and Analysis Centre v Crown Melbourne Limited
...v Flugge (No 2) [2017] VSC 117; (2017) 342 ALR 478 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Penalty Hearing) [2023] FCA 100 Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Macdonald (No 12) [2009] NSWSC 714; (2009) 259 ALR 116 Australian Securities and Investm......