Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date29 November 2022
Neutral Citation[2022] FCA 1422
Date29 November 2022
CourtFederal Court


FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2022] FCA 1422

File number(s):

QUD 96 of 2021



Judgment of:

DOWNES J



Date of judgment:

29 November 2022



Catchwords:

CORPORATIONS – alleged contraventions of ss 12DA and 12DB Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) and s 912A(1) Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) – where bank failed to waive monthly account fees in relation to certain accounts in breach of its contract with customers – whether a notation on the customer account statement or passbook that a fee had been charged was an implied representation by the bank that it had a contractual entitlement to charge that fee – whether misleading or deceptive conduct – whether a contractual promise to waive a fee carried with it an implied representation that the bank had and would have adequate systems and processes to ensure that the fee would be waived – whether false or misleading representations in connection with supply of financial services – consideration of characteristics of ordinary and reasonable member of the class of customers to whom representations were alleged to have been made – whether bank’s conduct was a failure to do all things necessary to ensure that the financial services covered by its licence were provided honestly, efficiently and fairly – where bank introduced measures and improved its systems in order to assist in detecting and preventing issues associated with the failure to waive fees – where bank took steps to investigate the cause of the errors; designed, implemented and tested an appropriate mechanism for rectifying errors and preventing their recurrence; identified all customers and customer accounts affected by the errors; and remediated all affected customers, where possible, or made contributions to charity – claims dismissed



Legislation:

Australian Securities and Investments Commission Act 2001 (Cth) ss 12BA(1), 12BB, 12DA, 12DB

Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) ss 9, 912A, 912C, 912D, 961L

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 140, 191

Trade Practices Act 1974 (Cth) s 52



Cases cited:

Australian Competition & Consumer Commission v Dateline Imports Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 114

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Dukemaster Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 682

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Kimberly-Clark Australia Pty Ltd [2019] FCA 992

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Optus Mobile Pty Limited [2019] FCA 106

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Limited (2007) 244 ALR 470; [2007] FCA 1904

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Telstra Corporation Limited (2018) ATPR 42–593; [2018] FCA 571

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v TPG Internet Pty Ltd (2020) 278 FCR 450; [2020] FCAFC 130

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Woolworths Limited [2019] FCA 1039

Australian Securities & Investments Commission v AMP Financial Planning Pty Ltd (No 2) (2020) 377 ALR 55; [2020] FCA 69

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v AGM Markets Pty Ltd (in liq) (No 3) (2020) 275 FCR 57; [2020] FCA 208

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited (No 3) [2020] FCA 1421

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Australia and New Zealand Banking Group Limited [2022] FCA 1251

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Camelot Derivatives Pty Ltd (In Liquidation); In the Matter of Camelot Derivatives Pty Limited (In Liquidation) (2012) 88 ACSR 206; [2012] FCA 414

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Cassimatis (No 8) (2016) 336 ALR 209; [2016] FCA 1023

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2020] FCA 790

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Dover Financial Advisers Pty Ltd (2019) 140 ACSR 561; [2019] FCA 1932

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v GetSwift Limited (Liability Hearing) [2021] FCA 1384

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v MLC Nominees Pty Ltd (2020) 147 ACSR 266; [2020] FCA 1306

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v National Australia Bank Limited [2022] FCA 1324

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Vocation Limited (In Liquidation) (2019) 136 ACSR 339; [2019] FCA 807

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (Omnibus) (2022) 159 ACSR 381; [2022] FCA 515

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Banking Corporation (No 2) (2018) 266 FCR 147; [2018] FCA 751

Australian Securities and Investments Commission v Westpac Securities Administration Ltd (2019) 272 FCR 170; [2019] FCAFC 187

Butcher v Lachlan Elder Realty Pty Limited (2004) 218 CLR 592; [2004] HCA 60

Cash Bazaar Pty Ltd v RAA Consults Pty Ltd (No 2) (2020) 381 ALR 668; [2020] FCA 636

Cassimatis v Australian Securities and Investments Commission (2020) 275 FCR 533; [2020] FCAFC 52

Clarke (as trustee of the Clarke Family Trust) v Great Southern Finance Pty Ltd (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liquidation) [2014] VSC 516

Coles Supermarkets Australia Pty Ltd v FKP Limited [2008] FCA 1915

Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Energy, Information, Postal, Plumbing and Allied Services Union of Australia v Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (2007) 162 FCR 466; [2007] FCAFC 132

Concrete Constructions Group v Litevale Pty Ltd (2002) 170 FLR 290; [2002] NSWSC 670

Dovuro Pty Limited v Wilkins (2003) 215 CLR 317; [2003] HCA 51

Futuretronics International Pty Ltd v Gadzhis [1992] 2 VR 217

HTW Valuers (Central Qld) Pty Ltd v Astonland Pty Ltd (2004) 217 CLR 640; [2004] HCA 54

McGrath v Australian Naturalcare Products Pty Ltd (2008) 165 FCR 230; [2008] FCAFC 2

Secure Parking Pty Ltd v Woollahra Municipal Council [2016] NSWCA 154

SPEL Environmental Pty Ltd v IES Stormwater Pty Ltd [2022] FCA 891



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Queensland



National Practice Area:

Commercial and Corporations



Sub-area:

Regulator and Consumer Protection



Number of paragraphs:

172



Date of hearing:

10–11 October 2022



Counsel for the Plaintiff:

Mr S Couper KC w/ Mr S Seefeld



Solicitor for the Plaintiff:

Australian Government Solicitor



Counsel for the Defendant:

Mr B Walker SC w/ Mr P Kulevski and Ms L Coleman



Solicitor for the Defendant:

Clayton Utz



ORDERS


QUD 96 of 2021

BETWEEN:

AUSTRALIAN SECURITIES AND INVESTMENTS COMMISSION

Plaintiff


AND:

COMMONWEALTH BANK OF AUSTRALIA ACN 123 123 124

Defendant



order made by:

DOWNES J

DATE OF ORDER:

29 november 2022



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


1. The claims for the relief in the originating process are dismissed.

2. The plaintiff pay the defendant’s costs of the proceeding to be agreed or, failing agreement, to be taxed.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 firm's commentaries
  • FSR GPS: When Is An Incorrect Misstatement Not Misleading Or Deceptive?
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 12 July 2023
    ...Limited [2007] FCA 1904, [15] (Gordon J), citing ACCC v Telstra Corporation Limited [2004] FCA 987, [49] (Gyles J). 2. ASIC v CBA [2022] FCA 1422, 3. ACCC v Dukemaster Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 682, [10] (Gordon J), as cited with approval in ACCC v Dateline Imports Pty Ltd [2015] FCAFC 114, [179] ......
  • Regulatory Rumbles: Materiality In The Efficiently Obligation
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 19 March 2024
    ...[360]. 3. [2022] FCA 1324. 4. [2022] FCA 1324, [372]. 5. [2022] FCA 1324, [357]. 6. RG 78.112. 7. ASIC v Commonwealth Bank of Australia [2022] FCA 1422. 8. [2022] FCA 1422, [85] and 9. ASIC v Westpac Securities Administration Ltd (2019) 272 FCR 170, [173]. The content of this article is int......