Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Visy Packaging Pty Ltd (No 3)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation2013-0529 FCA A
Date2013
CourtFederal Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
10 cases
  • Flageul v WeDrive Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Full Federal Court (Australia)
    • June 15, 2021
    ...cross-examination: c.f. Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v. Visy Packaging Pty Ltd (No 3) (2013) 216 F.C.R. 70 at 120 [251]. The failure to observe the rule in Browne v. Dunn goes some way, in the particular circumstances of this case, to support ......
  • Australian Building & Construction Commissioner v Molina (No 2)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • July 2, 2019
    ...v Parker [2017] FCA 564 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Visy Packaging Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] FCA 525 Board of Bendigo Regional Institute of Technical and Further Education v Barclay [2012] HCA 32; (2012) 248 CLR 500 Briginshaw v Briginshaw [193......
  • Southern Migrant and Refugee Centre Inc v Shum (No 3)
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • May 4, 2022
    ...(2019) 273 FCR 332 Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Visy Packaging Pty Ltd (No 3) (2013) 216 FCR 70 Bale v Mills (2011) 81 NSWLR 498 Briginshaw v Briginshaw (1938) 60 CLR 336 Brown v Dunn (1893) 6 R 67 Communications, Electrical, Electronic, Ene......
  • Flageul v WeDrive Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • November 18, 2020
    ...cross-examination: c.f. Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v. Visy Packaging Pty Ltd (No 3) (2013) 216 F.C.R. 70 at 120 [251]. The failure to observe the rule in Browne v. Dunn goes some way, in the particular circumstances of this case, to support ......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
  • Safety First: Adverse Action in the context of work health and safety
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • July 20, 2013
    ...SUMMARY The recent Federal Court decision in AMWU v Visy Packaging Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] FCA 525 demonstrates the careful balancing act an employer faces when disciplining an employee for misconduct where the employee has raised safety concerns. The case also highlights how a wide range of ......
  • Misconduct investigations: our top tips
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • March 27, 2015
    ...overly influenced by the employer. In Automotive, Food, Metals, Engineering, Printing and Kindred Industries Union v Visy Pty Ltd (No 3) [2013] FCA 525 the employer framed the questions for the investigation, required the HR Manager to sit in on the interview with the employee accused of mi......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT