Awb Ltd v Honourable Terence Rhoderic Hudson Cole
| Jurisdiction | Australia Federal only |
| Neutral Citation | 2006-0517 FCA A |
| Date | 2006 |
| Court | Federal Court |
-
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
View this document and try vLex for 7 days - TRY VLEX
- This document is available in original version only for vLex customers
49 cases
-
Estera Trust (Jersey) Ltd and Another (Petitioners) v Jasminder Singh and Others
...at paras. 2–015 and 2–016. The cases cited are Dalleagles Pty Ltd v Australian Securities Commission (1991) 4 WAR 325 at 333–334 and AWB v Terence Cole [2006] FCA 571 at [133] and [142]. In the first of these cases, Anderson J stated that privilege extended to documents which would, if disc......
-
The Civil Aviation Authority v R Jet2.com Ltd
...Resources”). In Australia, it is now well-established that the dominant purpose test applies to LAP (see, e.g., AWB Limited v Cole [2006] FCA 571). 76 The dominant purpose issue first arose in this jurisdiction in Waugh, the facts of which did not substantially differ from those of Grant v ......
- Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Cadbury Schweppes Pty Ltd
- Awb Ltd v Cole (No 5)
Request a trial to view additional results
2 firm's commentaries
-
What is "evidence" of a privileged communication?
...2 To which the judge in FSCS had apparently not been referred. 3 This distinction was drawn in the Australian case of AWB v Terence Cole [2006] FCA 571. 4 As explained more fully in West London Pipeline v Total UK [2008] EWHC 1729 Christabel Constance function JDS_LoadEvent(func) { var exis......
-
The focus on corruption in Australia continues
...fact-finding missions. The far reaching extent of these powers was highlighted by the decision of Justice Young in AWB Limited v Cole (2006) 152 FCR 382. Significantly, in that case it was held that Royal Commissions are not proceedings for the purposes of client legal privilege. Therefore,......
4 books & journal articles
-
Table of Cases
...2002)[2005] 1 AC 167. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 205Aveson v Lord Kinnard (1805) 6 East 188 . . . . 115AWB Ltd v Cole (2006) 152 FCR 382; [2006]FCA 571 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .145, 148, 322AWB Ltd v Cole (No. 5) [2006] FCA 1234. . . . . 145Barclays Bank Plc......
-
Litigation Privilege: Transient or Timeless? Blank v Canada (Minister of Justice)
...(2001) 30 Common Law World Review 66 at69–76.2 [1997] AC 16.3 [2005] 1 AC 610 at [29]; cf. at [53], per Lord Rodger of Earlsferry.4 (2006) 152 FCR 382 at [158]–[164].5 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 1999 (Qld), r. 212(2) (see Parr vBavarian Steak House Pty Ltd [2001] 2 QdR 196; Mitchell Cont......
-
The influence of Professor J.H. Wigmore on evidence law in Australia
...& Mortgage Corporation Ltd v Hay Property Consultants Pty Ltd [2011]FCAFC 4, per Finkelstein J. 73. Aytugrul, above n. 71 at [75].74. [2006] FCA 571. 43 44 The International Journal of Evidence & Proof document had been inadvertently produced to the Inquiry by AWB Ltd but, as such and based......
-
Noticeboard
...account. THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EVIDENCE & PROOF 145NOTICEBOARDLegal professional privilege was also considered in AWB Ltd vCole [2006] FCA 571. Inthis case the Australian Wheat Board challenged a ruling by Commissioner Colewho was conducting a Commission of Inquiry pursuant to the Ro......