Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeKENNY J
Judgment Date25 September 2020
Neutral Citation[2020] FCA 1373
CourtFederal Court
Date25 September 2020

FEDERAL COURT OF AUSTRALIA


Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1373

File number:

VID 1408 of 2016



Judge:

KENNY J



Date of judgment:

25 September 2020



Catchwords:

PATENTS – changing sign system for use as variable speed limit sign on roadways – construction of claims – whether method or product claims – product claims containing a limitation by result – clarity of claims – infringement – defence of Crown use – defence of innocent infringement – defence of prior use – lapsed patent – alleged invalidity of patent on grounds of lack of novelty, inventive step and entitlement, and failure to disclose best method – held: no infringement; patent wholly invalid for lack of inventive step; partially invalid for want of novelty



Legislation:

Acts Interpretation Act 1901 (Cth) s 15AA

City of Adelaide Act 1998 (SA) s 4

City of Greater Geelong Act 1993 (Vic) s 5

Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) s 115

Evidence Act 1995 (Cth) ss 60, 63, 67, 69, 79, 135, 136, 160, 192

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) rr 1.34, 23.13, 30.29

Highways Act 1926 (SA) ss 2, 8, 10(1), 13, 20, 20B, 26, 28, 31, 31A, 32

Local Government Act 1989 (Vic) ss 3C, 3D, 111, 111A, 132, 133, 135, 186, 203, 204, 205, 206, 207, 208H, 209, 218, 218A

Patents Act 1903 (Cth)

Patents Act 1949 (UK) s 59

Patents Act 1952 (Cth) ss 100, 125, 132, 158

Patents Act 1977 (UK) ss 62, 64

Patents Act 1990 (Cth) ss 7, 13, 18, 22A, 24, 40, 115, 117, 119, 120, 122, 123, 138, 139, 143, 162, 163, 223, Sch 1

Patents Regulations 1991 (Cth) regs 2.2, 2.3, 13.3, 13.6

Transport Act 1983 (Vic) ss 15, 16, 21, 31

Transport Integration Act 2010 (Vic) ss 80, 82)



Cases cited:

Actavis Pty Ltd v Orion Corporation [2016] FCAFC 121

Aktiebolaget Hässle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2000] FCA 1303; 51 IPR 375

Aktiebolaget Hässle v Alphapharm Pty Ltd[2002] HCA 59; 212 CLR 411

Aktiengesellschaft für Autogene Aluminium Schweissung v London Aluminium Co Ltd(No 2)(1923) 40 RPC 107

Albany Molecular Research Inc v Alphapharm Pty Ltd[2011] FCA 120; 90 IPR 457

Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue[2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27

Alphapharm Pty Ltd v H Lundbeck A/S[2008] FCA 559; 76 IPR 618

Anaesthetic Supplies Pty Ltd v Rescare Ltd (1994) 50 FCR 1; 122 ALR 141; 28 IPR 383

Apotex Pty Ltd v Les Laboratoires Servier (No 2) [2012] FCA 748

Apotex Pty Ltd v Sanofi-Aventis [2008] FCA 1191

Apotex Pty Ltd v Warner-Lambert Company LLC (No 2) [2016] FCA 1238; 122 IPR 17

Aspirating IP Limited v Vision Systems Limited[2010] FCA 1061; 88 IPR 52

AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd[2014] FCAFC 99; 226 FCR 324

AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd[2015] HCA 30; 257 CLR 356

Atlantis Corp Pty Ltd v Schindler (1997) 39 IPR 29

Austal Ships Sales Pty Ltd v Stena Rederi Aktiebolag[2008] FCAFC 121; 77 IPR 229

Australian Medic-Care Company Ltd v Hamilton Pharmaceutical Pty Ltd [2009] FCA 1220; 261 ALR 501

Australian Mud Company Pty Ltd v Coretell Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 1372

B. Braun Melsungen AG v Multigate Medical Devices Pty Ltd [2014] FCA 1110

Bank of Credit & Commerce International v Price Waterhouse (No 3)[1998] Ch 84

Beadcrete Pty Ltd v Fei Yu (t/as Jewels 4 Pools) (No 3) [2013] FCA 187; 100 IPR 188

Bitech Engineering v Garth Living Pty Ltd[2010] FCAFC 75; 86 IPR 468

Blatch v Archer (1774) 1 Cowp 63; 98 ER 969

Bristol-Myers Co v Beecham Group Ltd[1974] AC 646; 2 WLR 79

Bristol-Myers Squibb Co v F H Faulding & Co Ltd [2000] FCA 316; 97 FCR 524

Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd (No 3) [2012] FCA 1019

Britax Childcare Pty Ltd v Infa-Secure Pty Ltd (No 4) [2015] FCA 651; 113 IPR 280

British Dynamite Co v Krebs (1879) 13 RPC 190

Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith Ltd[1982] RPC 183

CCOM Pty Ltd v Jiejing Pty Ltd (1993) 27 IPR 577

Certain Lloyd’s Underwriters v Cross[2012] HCA 56; 248 CLR 378

Collins v Northern Territory [2007] FCAFC 152; 243 ALR 483

Commissioner of Patents v Emperor Sports Pty Ltd[2006] FCAFC 26; 149 FCR 386; 67 IPR 488

Commissioner of Taxation v Cassaniti [2018] FCAFC 212; 266 FCR 385

Committee of Direction of Fruit Marketing v Australian Postal Commission(1980) 144 CLR 577

Conor Medsystems Inc v University of British Columbia[2005] FCA 1661; 223 ALR 74

Coretell Pty Ltd v Australian Mud Co Pty Ltd [2017] FCAFC 54; 250 FCR 136

D’Arcy v Myriad Genetics Inc[2015] HCA 35; 258 CLR 334

Davies v Lazer Safe Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 702; 132 IPR 202

Dometic Australia Pty Ltd v Houghton Leisure Products Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1573; 135 IPR 403

Doric Products Pty Ltd v Asia Pacific Trading (Aust) Pty Ltd [2017] FCA 849; 125 IPR 182

Doric Products Pty Ltd v Lockwood Security Products Pty Ltd [2001] FCA 1877; 53 IPR 270

Dyson Appliances Ltd v Hoover Ltd[2002] RPC 22

E.I. Du Pont (Witsiepe’s) Application [1982] FSR. 303

Seafood Innovations Pty Ltd v Richard Bass Pty Ltd[2011] FCAFC 83; 92 IPR 1

Elconnex Pty Limited v Gerard Industries Pty Limited (1991) 32 FCR 491

Electric and Musical Industries, Ltd v Lissen, Ltd [1938] 4 All ER 221

Eli Lilly and Company Limited v Apotex Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 214

Embertec Pty Ltd v Energy Efficient Technologies Pty Ltd [2013] FCA 2; 99 IPR 103

Emory University v Biochem Pharma Inc [1998] FCA 915; 42 IPR 35

Emperor Sports Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Patents[2005] FCA 996; 146 FCR 159

Firebelt Pty Ltd v Brambles Australia Ltd [2000] FCA 1689; 51 IPR 531

Firebelt Pty Ltd v Brambles Australia Ltd [2002] HCA 21; 188 ALR 280; 54 IPR 449

Flexible Steel Lacing Co v Beltreco Ltd[2000] FCA 890; 49 IPR 331

Food and Beverage Australia Limited v Nash [2020] SASC 92

Forticrete Ltd v Lafarge Roofing Ltd [2005] EWHC 3024 (Ch)

Freeman v TJ and FL Pohlner Pty Ltd(1994) 30 IPR 377

Fresenius Medical Care Australia Pty Limited v Gambro Pty Limited[2005] FCAFC 220; 67 IPR 230; 224 ALR 168

General Steel Industries Inc v Commissioner for Railways (NSW) (1964) 112 CLR 125

General Tire & Rubber Co v Firestone Tyre & Rubber Co Ltd[1972] RPC 457

Generic Health Pty Ltd v Bayer Pharma Aktiengesellschaft [2014] FCAFC 73; 222 FCR 336; 106 IPR 381

GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Ltd v Apotex Pty Ltd [2016] FCA 608; 119 IPR 1

GlaxoSmithKline Consumer Healthcare Investments (Ireland) (No 2) Ltd v Generic Partners Pty Ltd [2018] FCAFC 71; 264 FCR 474; 131 IPR 384

Global Blue SA v Visa USA Inc [2018] APO 86

Grove Hill Pty Ltd v Great Western Corporation Pty Ltd[2002] FCAFC 183; 55 IPR 257

Guest v Federal Commissioner of Taxation[2007] FCA 193; 65 ATR 815

H Lundbeck A/S v Alphapharm Pty Ltd [2009] FCAFC 70; 177 FCR 151; 81 IPR 228

H.Lundbeck A/S v Sandoz Pty Ltd [2018] FCA 1797; 137 IPR 408

Haberman v Jackel International Ltd[1999] FSR 683

Helitune Ltd v Stewart Hughes Ltd [1991] FSR 171

Hill v Evans (1862) 4 De GF & J 288; 1A IPR 1

ICI Chemicals & Polymers Ltd v Lubrizol Corporation Inc [2000] FCA 1349; 106 FCR 214

ICI Chemicals and Polymers...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
2 cases
  • Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 22 December 2020
    ...2020, the Court published reasons for judgment in this matter: see Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1373. At the same time, the Court made the following orders: 1. On or before 4:30 pm on 9 October 2020 the respondents/cross-claimants file and......
  • Jusand Nominees Pty Ltd v Rattlejack Innovations Pty Ltd
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 16 May 2022
    ...Cases cited: AstraZeneca AB v Apotex Pty Ltd (2015) 257 CLR 356 Axent Holdings Pty Ltd t/a Axent Global v Compusign Australia Pty Ltd (2020) 154 IPR 431 Azuko Pty Ltd v Old Digger Pty Ltd (2001) 52 IPR 75 Biogen Inc v Medeva Plc [1997] RPC 1 Bristol-Myers Co v Beecham Group Ltd [1974] AC 64......