Aytugrul v R

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
JudgeFrench CJ,Hayne,Heydon,Crennan,Bell JJ
Judgment Date18 April 2012
Neutral Citation2012-0418 HCA A,[2012] HCA 15
Docket NumberS315/2011
CourtHigh Court
Date18 April 2012
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
7 cases
  • Rivas v Republic of Chile
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 24 June 2021
    ...v Zentai [2012] HCA 28; (2012) 246 CLR 213 (Zentai), contending at [85]-[87] of her written submission: [85] In Commonwealth v Zentai [2012] HCA (15 August 2012) it is submitted that a fundamental principle was enunciated, namely that the requesting state and in fact the requested state sho......
  • Juan Carlos Cruz(Appellant) v The Queen
    • Australia
    • Court of Appeal of ACT
    • 23 October 2017
    ...and The Queen (Respondent) Representation:Counsel G D Wendler (Appellant) M Jones (Respondent) Cases Cited: Aytugrul v The Queen [2012] HCA 15 ; 247 CLR 170 Dinsdale v The Queen [2000] HCA 54 ; 202 CLR 321 Hili v The Queen [2010] HCA 45 ; 242 CLR 520 House v The King (1936) 55 CLR 499 IMM v......
  • Request a trial to view additional results
3 books & journal articles
  • The Basis of the ‘Basis Rule’: The Role of the Basis Rule in the Admissibility of Expert Opinion
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 43-2, June 2015
    • 1 June 2015
    ...basis rule, assumption identification r ule and statement of reasoning rule e xist both at common law 146 See, eg, Aytugrul v The Queen [2012] HCA 15 (18 April 2012) [32]; Illawarra Hotel Company Pty Ltd v Walton Construction Pty Ltd [2013] NSWCA 6 (11 February 2013) [101]. 147 The source o......
  • The influence of Professor J.H. Wigmore on evidence law in Australia
    • United Kingdom
    • International Journal of Evidence & Proof, The No. 19-1, January 2015
    • 1 January 2015
    ...21 see Heydon J, in dissent, who referred to Wigmore’s Treatise(Tillers rev., 1983), vol. 1 at 702–31 [14]–[14.1] and 847–55 [19]. 71. [2012] HCA 15.72. See also Pollitt v R (1992) 174 CLR 558, per Brennan J at [5]; see also Seltsam Pty Ltd v McGuiness (2000) 49 NSWLR 262 [91]; see also the......
  • Resolving the Application of the Christie Discretion in the Uniform Evidence Legislation
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 42-3, September 2014
    • 1 September 2014
    ...on the day of the murder. 6 The uniform evidence legislation covers six Australian jurisdictions: Evidence Act 1995 (Cth); Evidence Act 1995 (NSW); Evidence Act 2001 (Tas); Evidence Act 2008 (Vic); Evidence Act 2011 (ACT); and Evidence (National Uniform Legislation) Act 2011 (NT). The State......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT