AZAFF v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date02 November 2022
Neutral Citation[2022] FCAFC 176
Date02 November 2022
CourtFull Federal Court (Australia)
AZAFF v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 176


Federal Court of Australia


AZAFF v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 176

Appeal from:

Application for an extension of time to appeal: AZAFF v Minister for Immigration Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 1540



File number(s):

SAD 13 of 2021



Judgment of:

COLLIER, FARRELL AND ABRAHAM jJ



Date of judgment:

2 November 2022



Catchwords:

MIGRATION – application for an extension of time in which to appeal decision of the (then) Federal Circuit Court – r 36.05 of the Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) –– where the primary Judge dismissed an application for review of a decision of the Immigration Assessment Authority affirming decision not to grant protection visa – where applicant claims the IAA did not consider best interests of child applicant – art 3(1) Convention on Rights of the Child – where applicant claims error of jurisdiction of IAA not to seek further information under s 473DC(3) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) - where inadequate reason for delay – application filed after a delay of 218 days - principles for extension of time to file an appeal – application for extension of time dismissed


PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE - application for leave to rely on new grounds not before the primary Judge – whether adequate reasons provided for failure to raise grounds before primary Judge – degree of prejudice to be faced by the parties - whether proposed new grounds have sufficient merit – leave to rely on new grounds refused



Legislation:

Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5H(1), 36, 65, 91W, 473CB, 473DA, 473DC, 473DD, 473GA, 473GB)

Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth) r 36.03



Cases cited:

AAM15 v Minister for Immigration ad Border Protection [2015] FCA 804; (2015) 231 FCR 452

ABT17 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2020) 383 ALR 407

AZAFF v Minister for Immigration Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 1540

BLX16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 176

BVG17 v BVH17 [2019] FCAFC 17

CSR16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 474

DGPZ v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 107

DKT16 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2019] FCAFC 208

Doves v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 134

DXQ16 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1184

GOK18 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 169

Han v Minister for Home Affairs [2019] FCA 331

Leota v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1120

MBJY v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 11

Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Teoh (1995) 183 CLR 273

Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v BTW17 [2020] FCAFC 159

Murad v Assistance Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 73

Nweke v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 266

NWQR v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 30

O’Brien v Komesaroff [1982] HCA 33; (1982) 150 CLR 310

Plaintiff M174/2016 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] HCA 16

Poroa v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCA 826

Promsopa v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCA 1480

Raibevu v Minister for Home Affairs at [95]; AAD16 v Minister for Immigration and Boarder Protection [2018] FCA 1433

Say v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 84

Singh v Minister for Home Affairs [2020] FCAFC 7

Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection (2018) 261 FCR 556

Singh v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2017] FCAFC 195

SZBPQ v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs [2005] FCA 568

SZRLY v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2012] FCA 1459

Tohi v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2021] FCAFC 125

Vaitaiki v Minister for Immigration & Ethnic Affairs [1998] FCA 5

Vu v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCAFC 90; 276 FCR 516

VUAX v Minister for Immigration & Multicultural & Indigenous Affairs (2004) 238 FCR 588; [2004] FCAFC 158



Division:

General Division



Registry:

South Australia



National Practice Area:

Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights



Number of paragraphs:

97



Date of hearing:

8 November 2021



Counsel for the Applicants:

Dr S Churches with Ms C Follett



Solicitor for the Applicants:

MSM Legal



Counsel for the First Respondent:

Ms K Hooper with Mr T Ellison



Solicitor for the First Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor

ORDERS


SAD 13 of 2021

BETWEEN:

AZAFF

First Applicant


AZAFG

Second Applicant


AAB18

Third Applicant


AND:

MINISTER FOR IMMIGRATION, CITIZENSHIP AND MULTICULTURAL AFFAIRS

First Respondent


IMMIGRATION ASSESSMENT AUTHORITY

Second Respondent



order made by:

COLLIER, FARRELL AND ABRAHAM jJ

DATE OF ORDER:

2 november 2022



THE COURT ORDERS THAT:


  1. The name of the first respondent be changed to Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs.

  2. The application for an extension of time filed on 5 February 2021 be dismissed.

  3. Leave to rely on the amended draft notice of appeal annexed to the affidavit of Catherine Follett filed on 6 October 2021 be refused.

  4. The applicants pay the costs of the first respondent to be taxed if not otherwise agreed.



Note: Entry of orders is dealt with in Rule 39.32 of the Federal Court Rules 2011.


REASONS FOR JUDGMENT

THE COURT:

introduction
  1. Before the Court is an application for an extension of time to appeal a decision of the Federal Circuit Court of Australia (now Division 2 of the Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia) delivered ex tempore on 3 June 2020 (AZAFF v Minister for Immigration Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2020] FCCA 1540 (primary decision)). The applicant also seeks leave in the appeal to rely on new arguments not raised before the primary Judge.

  2. Before the primary Judge the present applicants sought judicial review of a decision of the second respondent, the Immigration Assessment Authority, (IAA) made on 11 December 2017, affirming a decision of a delegate of the first respondent, the Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs (Minister) of 20 October 2017 to refuse protection visas to the applicants.

  3. The amended draft notice of appeal (amended draft notice of appeal) on...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
1 cases
  • Englezos v Secretary, Department of Social Services
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • 30 January 2023
    ...Act 1991 (Cth) Federal Court Rules 2011 (Cth)) Cases cited: AZAFF v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCAFC 176 BJT19 v Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs [2022] FCA 870 BLD16 v Minister for Immigration and ......