Azimitabar v Commonwealth of Australia

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Judgment Date06 July 2023
Neutral Citation[2023] FCA 760
Date06 July 2023
CourtFederal Court
Azimitabar v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 760


Federal Court of Australia


Azimitabar v Commonwealth of Australia [2023] FCA 760

File number:

VID 177 of 2021



Judgment of:

MURPHY J



Date of judgment:

6 July 2023



Catchwords:

MIGRATION – applicant transferred to Australia for psychiatric assessment and treatment and detained in a hotel – whether subpara (b)(v) of the definition of “immigration detention” in s 5(1) of the Migration Act 1958 (Cth) empowered Minister to approve ‘another place’ of immigration detention – whether power in subpara (b)(v) of the definition of “immigration detention” to approve ‘another place’ of immigration detention was impliedly limited such that it did not include power to approve a de facto detention centre – whether hotels were lawfully approved as places of immigration detention – whether the applicant’s detention in the hotels was unlawful.


CONSTITUTIONAL LAW – whether lawfulness of immigration detention depends upon whether expenditure on the place of detention is properly authorised – whether the Commonwealth’s contracting and expenditure on the hotels as places of immigration detention was lawfully authorised by executive power under s 61 of the Constitution – whether the Commonwealth’s contracting and expenditure on the hotels as places of immigration detention was lawfully authorised by s 32B of the Financial Framework (Supplementary Powers) Act 1997 (Cth) and regulations



Legislation:

Constitution s 61

Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth) ss 37AF, 37AG

Financial Framework (Supplementary Powers) Act 1997 (Cth) s 32B

Financial Framework Legislation Amendment Act (No 3) 2012 (Cth)

Financial Management and Accountability Act 1997 (Cth)

Migration Act 1958 (Cth) ss 5, 14, 46A, 46B, 48B, 92, 93, 189, 196, 197AB, 198AD, 198AH, 198B, 198C, 253, 273, 496

Migration Amendment (Unauthorised Maritime Arrivals and Other Measures) Act 2013 (Cth) s 5AA

Migration Legislation Amendment Act 1989 (Cth) ss 5G, 59, 92, 93

Migration Amendment Act 1992 (Cth) ss 3A, 11, 38, 54L, 54K, 54W, 54ZD, 54Z

Migration Reform Act 1992 (Cth)

Migration Legislation Amendment Act 1994 (Cth) ss 4, 189, 196, 198

Financial Management and Accountability Regulations 1997 (Cth)

Financial Framework (Supplementary Powers) Regulations 1997 (Cth) reg 16

Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth) reg 2.43



Cases cited:

Alcan (NT) Alumina Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Territory Revenue (NT) [2009] HCA 41; 239 CLR 27

Anthony Hordern & Sons Ltd v Amalgamated Clothing & Allied Trades Union of Australia [1932] HCA 9; 47 CLR 1

Attorney-General (Cth) v Oates [1999] HCA 35; 198 CLR 162

Attorney-General (SA) v Corporation of the City of Adelaide [2013] HCA 3; 249 CLR 1

Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Valve Corporation (No 5) [2016] FCA 741

Aye v Minister for Immigration [2010] FCAFC 69; 187 FCR 449

AZC20 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCA 1234

B v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] FCA 699

Behrooz v Secretary of the Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2004] HCA 36; 219 CLR 486

Bianca Hope Rinehart v Georgina Hope Rinehart [2014] FCA 1241

Burns Philp & Co Ltd v Murphy (1993) 29 NSWLR 723

BXT17 v Minister for Home Affairs [2021] FCAFC 9; 283 FCR 248

Byrne v Garrison [1965] VR 523

Chiropractors Association v WorkCover Corporation [1999] SASC 470; 75 SASR 374

Chu Kheng Lim v Minister for Immigration, Local Government and Ethnic Affairs and Anor [1992] HCA 64; 176 CLR 1

Commonwealth of Australia v AJL20 [2021] HCA 21; 273 CLR 43

Computer Interchange Pty Ltd v Microsoft Corporation (1999) 88 FCR 438; [1999] FCA 198

Department of Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Mastipour [2004] FCAFC 93; 259 FCR 576

Fairfax Digital Australia and New Zealand Pty Ltd v Ibrahim and Ors [2012] NSWCCA 125; 83 NSWLR 52

Farah Constructions Pty Ltd v Say-Dee Pty Ltd [2007] HCA 22; 230 CLR 89

Federal Commissioner of Taxation v Consolidated Media Holdings Ltd [2012] HCA 55; 250 CLR 503

Gibb v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [1966] HCA 74; 118 CLR 628

Graham v Minister for Immigration [2018] FCA 1012; 265 FCR 634

Highstoke Pty Ltd v Hays Knight GTO Pty Ltd [2007] FCA 13; 156 FCR 501

Hill v Zuda Pty Ltd [2022] HCA 21; 401 ALR 624

Hogan v Australian Crime Commission (2010) 240 CLR 651; [2010] HCA 21

HongKong Bank of Australia Ltd v Australian Securities Commission [1992] FCA 376; 40 FCR 402

Kelly v The Queen [2004] HCA 12; 218 CLR 216

McCulloch v State of Maryland 17 US 316 (1819)

Mercantile Mutual Life Insurance Co v Australian Securities Commission [1993] FCA 77; 40 FCR 409

Minister for Immigration and Ethnic Affairs v Mayer [1985] HCA 70; 157 CLR 290

Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs v Nystrom [2006] HCA 50; 228 CLR 566

Minister for Immigration, Citizenship, Migrant Services and Multicultural Affairs v AZC20 [2022] FCAFC 52; 290 FCR 149 (AZC20 FC)

Moreton Bay Regional Council v Mekpine Pty Ltd [2016] HCA 7; 256 CLR 437

NEAT Domestic Trading Pty Ltd v AWB Ltd [2003] HCA 35; 216 CLR 277

New South Wales v TD [2013] NSWCA 32; 83 NSWLR 566

Pape v Federal Commissioner of Taxation [2009] HCA 23; 238 CLR 1

Penola & District Ratepayers’ & Residents’ Association Inc v Wattle Range Council [2011] SASFC 62; 110 SASR 110

Plaintiff M76/2013 v Minister for Immigration, Multicultural Affairs and Citizenship [2013] HCA 53; 251 CLR 322

Plaintiff S4/2014 v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2014] HCA 34; 253 CLR 219

Project Blue Sky Inc v Australian Broadcasting Authority [1998] HCA 28; 194 CLR 355

Re-Excel Finance Corporation Ltd; Worthley v England [1994] FCA 551; 52 FCR 69

Saeed v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2010] HCA 23; 241 CLR 252

San v Rumble (No 2) [2007] NSWCA 259

SBEG v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] FCAFC 189; 208 FCR 235 (SBEG FC)

SBEG v Secretary, Department of Immigration and Citizenship (No 2) [2012] FCA 569 (SBEG (No 2)); 292 ALR 29

Smethurst v Commissioner of Police [2020] HCA 14; 272 CLR 177

Thomas v Mowbray [2007] HCA 33; 233 CLR 307

VLAH v Minister for Immigration and Multicultural and Indigenous Affairs [2002] FCA 1554

Wilkie v The Commonwealth [2017] HCA 40; 263 CLR 487

Williams v Commonwealth of Australia [2012] HCA 23; 248 CLR 156

Williams v Commonwealth of Australia [2014] HCA 23; 252 CLR 416

X7 v Australian Crime Commission [2013] HCA 29; 248 CLR 92



Division:

General Division



Registry:

Victoria



National Practice Area:

Administrative and Constitutional Law and Human Rights



Number of paragraphs:

306



Date of hearing:

19-20 July 2022



Counsel for the Applicant:

Ms L De Ferrari SC and Mr J Hartley



Solicitor for the Applicant:

Marque Lawyers



Counsel for the Respondent:

Mr G Hill SC, Mr A Yuile and Ms K McInnes



Solicitor for the Respondent:

Australian Government Solicitor

...

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex