Bacchus Marsh Concentrated Milk Company Ltd ((in Liquidation)) v Joseph Nathan & Company Ltd

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1919-0512 HCA B,[1919] HCA 18
Year1919
Date1919

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
26 cases
  • Royal Botanic Gardens and Domain Trust v South Sydney City Council
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 14 February 2002
    ...Law, (1997) 433. 85 (1909) 8 CLR 316 at 323–324. See also Bacchus Marsh Concentrated Milk Co Ltd (In Liq) v Joseph Nathan & Co Ltd (1919) 26 CLR 410 at 86Petelin v Cullen (1975) 132 CLR 355 at 359; see also Prenn v Simmonds [1971] 1 WLR 1381 at 1384; [1971] 3 All ER 237 at 240. 87 cf Greig......
  • Hepples v Federal Commissioner of Taxation
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Commissioner of State Revenue v Placer Dome Inc.
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 5 December 2018
    ...(1998) 193 CLR 605 at 620 [36] citing Muller [1901] AC 217, Bacchus Marsh Concentrated Milk Co Ltd (In liq) v Joseph Nathan & Co Ltd (1919) 26 CLR 410; [1919] HCA 18, Box (1952) 86 CLR 387, Geraghty v Minter (1979) 142 CLR 177 at 193; [1979] HCA 42 and Hepples (1992) 173 CLR 492. 83 Murry (......
  • Maggbury Pty Ltd v Hafele Australiapty Ltd
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 13 December 2001
    ...potential for the appellants' version was to retail at $150. 44Bacchus Marsh Concentrated Milk Co Ltd (in Liq) v Joseph Nathan & Co Ltd (1919) 26 CLR 410 at 440 per Isaacs J; Peters (WA) Ltd v Petersville Ltd (2001) 75 ALJR 1385 at 1394 [37]; 181 ALR 337 at 348. 45Peters American Delicacy ......
  • Get Started for Free