Bahr v Nicolay (No.2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation[1988] HCA 16
Date1988
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
158 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Inside track: Property & Real Estate - In the media, in practice and courts and cases
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 26 May 2020
    ...- knowledge by applicants of terms of settlement insufficient - leave granted - appeal allowed - Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) [1988] HCA 16; (1988) 164 CLR 604, Body Corporate No 12870 v Aldal Pty Ltd (2010) 29 VR 81 considered; Transfer of Land Act 1958 ss 42 and 43, Property Law Act 1958 s Harve......
  • Purchaser versus tenant's unregistered lease
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 February 2019
    ...that could only be achieved by the Purchaser agreeing to be bound by them; by applying the High Court's analysis in Bahr v Nicolay ((No2) [1988] HCA 16; [1988] 164 CLR 604) to the facts in the present case, it follows that clause 49.1 should be construed as obliging the Purchaser to honour ......
4 books & journal articles
  • The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review Nbr. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...explain why the no-invalidity _____________________________________________________________________________________ 335 Wainohu (2011) 2 78 ALR 1, 14 (French CJ and Kiefel J). Such flexible standards form the staple diet of the modern constitutional lawyer. Notable examples of such flexible......
  • CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND DISCRETION IN AUSTRALIA: TAKING STOCK.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 Nbr. 3, April 2021
    • 1 April 2021
    ...Stock Exchange Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 371 (Daly'); Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 (Baumgartner'); Bahr v Nicolay [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 604 (Bahr'); Bathurst City Council v PWC Properties Pty Ltd (1998) 195 CLR 566 (Bathurst'); Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101 (Giumelli'); Fa......
  • Equity, Trust and Restitution
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review Nbr. 2001, December 2001
    • 1 December 2001
    ...(Frazer v Walker[1967] 1 AC 569, Binions v Evans[1972] Ch 359, Lyus v Prowsa Developments[1982] 1 WLR 1044; Bahr v Nicolay (No 2)(1988) 164 CLR 604; United Overseas Finance Ltd v Victor Sakayamary[1997] 3 SLR 211). 12.7 Apart from the inference of an express trust, it is submitted that on t......
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review Nbr. 2001, December 2001
    • 1 December 2001
    ...Assets Co v Mere Roihi[1905] AC 176 at 210, and Waimiha Sawmilling Co v Waione Timber Co[1926] AC 101 at 106. In Bahr v Nicolay (No 2)(1988) 164 CLR 604, the statutory concept of fraud was also taken to mean personal dishonesty or moral turpitude. However, Thean JA referred (at 362) to Mill......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT