Bahr v Nicolay (No.2)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1988] HCA 16
Date1988
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
201 cases
2 firm's commentaries
  • Inside track: Property & Real Estate - In the media, in practice and courts and cases
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 26 May 2020
    ...- knowledge by applicants of terms of settlement insufficient - leave granted - appeal allowed - Bahr v Nicolay (No 2) [1988] HCA 16; (1988) 164 CLR 604, Body Corporate No 12870 v Aldal Pty Ltd (2010) 29 VR 81 considered; Transfer of Land Act 1958 ss 42 and 43, Property Law Act 1958 s Harve......
  • Purchaser versus tenant's unregistered lease
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 1 February 2019
    ...that could only be achieved by the Purchaser agreeing to be bound by them; by applying the High Court's analysis in Bahr v Nicolay ((No2) [1988] HCA 16; [1988] 164 CLR 604) to the facts in the present case, it follows that clause 49.1 should be construed as obliging the Purchaser to honour ......
6 books & journal articles
  • The Constitution and the Substantive Principles of Judicial Review: The Full Scope of the Entrenched Minimum Provision of Judicial Review
    • United Kingdom
    • Federal Law Review No. 39-3, September 2011
    • 1 September 2011
    ...explain why the no-invalidity _____________________________________________________________________________________ 335 Wainohu (2011) 2 78 ALR 1, 14 (French CJ and Kiefel J). Such flexible standards form the staple diet of the modern constitutional lawyer. Notable examples of such flexible......
  • CONSTRUCTIVE TRUSTS AND DISCRETION IN AUSTRALIA: TAKING STOCK.
    • Australia
    • Melbourne University Law Review Vol. 44 No. 3, April 2021
    • 1 April 2021
    ...Stock Exchange Ltd (1986) 160 CLR 371 (Daly'); Baumgartner v Baumgartner (1987) 164 CLR 137 (Baumgartner'); Bahr v Nicolay [No 2] (1988) 164 CLR 604 (Bahr'); Bathurst City Council v PWC Properties Pty Ltd (1998) 195 CLR 566 (Bathurst'); Giumelli v Giumelli (1999) 196 CLR 101 (Giumelli'); Fa......
  • Equity, Trust and Restitution
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2001, December 2001
    • 1 December 2001
    ...(Frazer v Walker[1967] 1 AC 569, Binions v Evans[1972] Ch 359, Lyus v Prowsa Developments[1982] 1 WLR 1044; Bahr v Nicolay (No 2)(1988) 164 CLR 604; United Overseas Finance Ltd v Victor Sakayamary[1997] 3 SLR 211). 12.7 Apart from the inference of an express trust, it is submitted that on t......
  • Land Law
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Annual Review No. 2006, December 2006
    • 1 December 2006
    ...para 18.3) at 210, Waimiha Sawmilling Company, Limited v Waione Timber Company, Limited[1926] AC 101 at 106, Bahr v Nicolay (No 2)(1988) 164 CLR 604 at 614 and Grgic v Australian and New Zealand Banking Group Ltd(1994) 33 NSWLR 202 at 221. 18.10 The court also took the opportunity to commen......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT