Bailey v Bailey

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1924-0610 HCA A,[1924] HCA 21
Date1924
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
2 firm's commentaries
  • Challenging the essential validity of a will
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 10 November 2021
    ...and Soulos [2019] NSWSC 671 (28 June 2019) [63]. 30 Re Hodges; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698, 704-7. 31 Bailey v Bailey (1924) 34 CLR 558, 570 (Isaacs J); Re Hodges; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698, 704; Tobin v Ezekiel [2012] NSWCA 285 (13 September 2012) [44] (Meagher 32 Gerov......
  • Challenging the essential validity of a will
    • Australia
    • Mondaq Australia
    • 10 November 2021
    ...and Soulos [2019] NSWSC 671 (28 June 2019) [63]. 30 Re Hodges; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698, 704-7. 31 Bailey v Bailey (1924) 34 CLR 558, 570 (Isaacs J); Re Hodges; Shorter v Hodges (1988) 14 NSWLR 698, 704; Tobin v Ezekiel [2012] NSWCA 285 (13 September 2012) [44] (Meagher 32 Gerov......
1 books & journal articles
  • A TALE OF TWO CAPACITIES
    • Singapore
    • Singapore Academy of Law Journal No. 2022, March 2022
    • 1 March 2022
    ...(1870): Time to Update the Test for Testamentary Capacity” (2017) 95(1) Canadian Bar Review 252 at 258; see also Bailey v Bailey (1924) 34 CLR 558 at 571. 54 See Lewison LJ's decision in Simon v Byford [2014] EWCA Civ 280 at [41] and Goss-Custard v Templeman [2020] EWHC 632 (Ch) at [136]. 5......

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT