Bailey v Marinoff

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
CourtHigh Court
Neutral Citation1971-1103 HCA A,[1971] HCA 49
Year1971
Date1971

Get this document and AI-powered insights with a free trial of vLex and Vincent AI

Get Started for Free

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
184 cases
  • Fai General Insurance Company Ltd v Southern Cross Exploration Nl
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • Invalid date
  • Sarah Brown v Alfred Chambers
    • Jamaica
    • Court of Appeal (Jamaica)
    • 29 July 2011
    ...of this case it is incidental to the enforcement of the judgment. The cases of Gamser v The Nominal Defendant 136 C.L.R 145 at 147and Bailey v Marinoff 125 C.L.R. were cited by Mr Haynes in support of his submissions. 4 Miss Reynolds argued that the power to amend, enforce and execute as st......
  • Maritime Union of Australia v Geraldton Port Authority
    • Australia
    • Federal Court
    • Invalid date
  • Djl v Central Authority
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 13 April 2000
    ...McDonald v McDonald (1965) 113 CLR 529 55. 38 These qualifications apart, the rule was that restated by Barwick CJ inBailey v Marinoff (1971) 125 CLR 529 with respect to the New South Wales Court of Appeal56: ‘Once an order disposing of a proceeding has been perfected by being drawn up as ......
  • Get Started for Free