Balcombe v De Simoni

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation1972-0224 HCA A,[1972] HCA 9
Date1972
Year1972
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex

Unlock full access with a free 7-day trial

Transform your legal research with vLex

  • Complete access to the largest collection of common law case law on one platform

  • Generate AI case summaries that instantly highlight key legal issues

  • Advanced search capabilities with precise filtering and sorting options

  • Comprehensive legal content with documents across 100+ jurisdictions

  • Trusted by 2 million professionals including top global firms

  • Access AI-Powered Research with Vincent AI: Natural language queries with verified citations

vLex
3 cases
  • Spies v R
    • Australia
    • High Court
    • 3 août 2000
    ...of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales, 7 October 1993. 92 Unreported, Court of Criminal Appeal of New South Wales, 19 December 1989. 93 (1972) 126 CLR 576 at 593. 94 [1903] 1 Ch 728 at 732–733. 95 [1961] AC 103 at 127. 96 (1915) 20 CLR 425 at 447. 97 R v Scott [1975] AC 819 at 838; Peters......
  • Albert Alexander Age v The State
    • Papua New Guinea
    • Supreme Court
    • 26 novembre 1979
    ...essential in establishing the offence to show that economic loss to the representee (bank) would have resulted. Balcombe v De Simoni (1972) 126 CLR 576 at 583–584; and Prosecutor's Request No 4 of 1974 [1975] PNGLR 365, referred to. (6) The conviction should be confirmed. Appeal. This was a......
  • The State v Richard Budu
    • Papua New Guinea
    • National Court
    • 14 septembre 2018
    ...it is not essential to have established that necessarily, economic loss to the representee would have resulted (Balcombe v. De Simoni (1972) 126 CLR. 576 at pp. 583-584; Prosecutor’s Request No. 4 of 1974 [1975] PNGLR 365).” 36. In this case there was a clear intention to induce the complai......