Banks v Transport Regulation Board (Victoria)

JurisdictionAustralia Federal only
Neutral Citation[1968] HCA 23,1968-0510 HCA B
Year1968
Date1968
CourtHigh Court
    • This document is available in original version only for vLex customers

      View this document and try vLex for 7 days
    • TRY VLEX
37 cases
6 books & journal articles
  • Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 31-3, September 2003
    • September 1, 2003
    ...Indigenous Affairs; Ex parte Applicants S134/2002 (2003) 195 ALR 1, 12 [48], 22–3 [100]. 93 See, eg, Banks v Transport Regulation Board (1968) 119 CLR 222, 241; R v Toohey (1981) 151 CLR 170, 186 (Gibbs CJ). 2003 Judicial Review of Non-Statutory Executive Powers 569 ________________________......
  • In A Fix: Fixed-Term Parliaments in the Australian States
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 41-2, June 2013
    • June 1, 2013
    ...37 Michael Stokes, 'The Constitution of Tasmania' (1992) 3 Public Law Review 99, 107. 38 Banks v Transport Regulation Board (Victoria) (1968) 119 CLR 222, 240–1 (Barwick CJ); Watson v South Australia (2010) 278 ALR 168, 173. 39 James Thomson, 'State Constitutional Law: Gathering the Frag me......
  • The Unfolding Purpose of Fairness
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 45-4, December 2017
    • December 1, 2017
    ...Australian Administrative Law’ (2010) 17 Australian Journal of Administrative Law 92, 95. 15 Banks v Transport Regulation Board (Vic) (1968) 119 CLR 222, which aligned with the finding to this effect of the Privy Council in Ridge v Baldwin [1964] AC 40. This shift overcame an influential ea......
  • Retreating to the History of Judicial Review?
    • United Kingdom
    • Sage Federal Law Review No. 47-2, June 2019
    • June 1, 2019
    ...London Electricity Joint Committee Co (1920) Ltd [1924] 1 KB 171, 204–5. 40. [1964] AC 40.41. Banks v Transport Regulation Board (Vic) (1968) 119 CLR 222.42. It is easier with hindsight to see Anisminic Ltd v Foreign Compensation Commission [1969] 2 AC 171 (‘Anisminic’) as the principal mar......
  • Request a trial to view additional results

VLEX uses login cookies to provide you with a better browsing experience. If you click on 'Accept' or continue browsing this site we consider that you accept our cookie policy. ACCEPT